TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒   Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
 ☐
Preliminary Proxy Statement
 ☐
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
 ☐
Definitive Additional Materials
 ☐
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
National Instruments Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):
No fee required.
 ☐
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)
Total fee paid:
required
 ☐
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials
 ☐
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)
Filing Party:
(4)
Date Filed:
0-11

TABLE OF CONTENTS


graphic
NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
Notice of 2020Proxy Statement
National Instruments Corporation | 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Date and Time:
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
9:00 AM, Central Daylight Time
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic
Letter to our Stockholders from
our Board Chair and our Chief Executive Officer and President
March 27, 2023
Dear Fellow Stockholders,
On behalf of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and management team of National Instruments Corporation (the “Company” or “NI”), we are pleased to invite you to attend our virtual 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) on May 9, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time. A notice of the meeting and our 2023 Proxy Statement containing important information about the matters to be voted upon and instructions on how you can vote your shares follow this letter.
This year we are offering a virtual stockholder meeting through which you can view the Annual Meeting, submit questions and vote online. We will also provide a live webcast of the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/‌NATI2023. A webcast, slides, and audio of the entire Annual Meeting will be available on the Investor Relations page of our Company website within a few days of the meeting and will remain available for one year from the date of the meeting. We hope this will enable those who cannot attend the virtual meeting in real-time to hear NI’s executives discuss our plans. In addition, we make available at our Investor Relations website a variety of information for investors. Our goal is to maintain the Company Investor Relations page as a portal through which investors can easily find or navigate to pertinent information about us.
Your vote is important to us. Whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Therefore, we urge you to promptly vote and submit your proxy via the internet, by phone, or by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you can vote at the meeting (electronically), even if you have previously submitted your proxy.
On behalf of the Board, we would like to express our appreciation for your continued investment in NI. We look forward to greeting as many of you as possible.
Sincerely,
Place:graphic
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the National Instruments Corporation (“NI”) 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”) via live webcast by visiting the following website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NATI2020. You will be able to participate in the Annual Meeting, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the live webcast by entering your 16-digit control number found on the voting form provided. Voting at www.proxyvote.com will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you participate in our live webcast.graphic
Michael E. McGrath
Board Chair
Eric H. Starkloff
CEO and President
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

graphic
Notice of 2023 Annual

Meeting of Stockholders
Business:Meeting Information

Date & Time
Tuesday, May 9, 2023
9:00 a.m., CDT

Location
Via live webcast by visiting the following website:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NATI2023

Record Date
March 13, 2023
How to Vote
Your vote is important! Please vote your shares at the meeting (electronically) or in one of the following ways:
By Internet
1.By Phone
To elect eachBy Mail
By Mobile Device
Visit the website listed in your notice of Michael E. McGrathinternet availability of proxy materials or your proxy or voting instruction form
Call the toll-free voting number in your voting materials
Mail your completed and Alexander M. Davern tosigned proxy or voting instruction form
Scan the BoardQR Barcode on your voting materials
Items of DirectorsBusiness
1
Elect the director nominees named in our proxy statement for a term of three years.
2
2.Approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, National Instruments Corporation's executive compensation program.
3
To approveApprove, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the frequency of stockholder votes on National Instruments Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.Corporation’s executive compensation program.
4
3.
To ratifyRatify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the National Instruments Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.2023.
5
4.
To consider and approve an advisory (non-binding) proposal concerning our executive compensation program.
5.
To transact suchConsider any other business as may properly comebrought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
meeting.
By Order of our Board of Directors,
graphic
R. Eddie Dixon, Jr.
Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President & Secretary
March 27, 2023
Record Date:
Only stockholders of record atImportant Notice Regarding the close of business on March 6, 2020, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Voting By Proxy:
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting via live webcast, we hope that you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote on the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail. If you received a paper copy of a proxy card by mail in response to your request for a hard copy of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting you may also vote by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose by following the instructions on the proxy card. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. For more details on how to vote your shares, please review the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card you received in the mail. Stockholders attending the Annual Meeting may vote at the Annual Meeting even if they have submitted a proxy. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously submitted proxy to be revoked unless you vote in person atHeld on May 9, 2023: National Instruments Corporation’s 2023 Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders for the Annual Meeting. If your sharesyear ended December 31, 2023 are held in the name of a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee, please coordinate with your broker, trustee, bank or other nominee to determine the method of voting your shares.available at:
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NATI2023
Sincerely,
/s/ R. Eddie Dixon, Jr.
Vice President, General CounselThis Notice and Secretary
the accompanying Proxy Statement, 2022 Annual Report, and Proxy Card or voting instruction form were first made available to stockholders beginning on March 24, 202027, 2023. You may vote if you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on March 13, 2023, the record date for notice of and voting at our Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION
This Proxy Statement contains the information that a stockholder should know before voting on the proposals described in the Notice. This introduction highlights certain information contained in this Proxy Statement as well as other relevant information. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Our Business
In 1976 we started a business to connect instruments with software and personal computers that transformed how engineers test and measure technological innovations. Decades later that vision continues to drive our call for companies to Engineer Ambitiously. NI’s enterprise approach to test combines our deep expertise with software that connects systems and data. This approach is revolutionizing how enterprises use test insights to drive their product and business performance. We are always pushing to create new technology that empowers our customers to solve the world’s toughest challenges.
We continue to experience strong demand from our customers across all geographic regions and end markets that we serve, with the value of total orders during 2022 increasing by approximately 10% compared to the same period in 2021. We remain focused on key areas our customers are investing in, such as wireless semiconductors and electronics, vehicle electrification and active safety systems. While we expect to continue experiencing some challenges related to supply chain constraints, we are optimistic about our ability to maintain competitive lead times while continuing to maintain higher backlog levels, and we remain committed to our target of delivering at least 300 bps of non-GAAP operating margin improvement in 2023.
Our Strategy
Our overarching goal is to be the leader in software-connected automated test and automated measurement systems. This core strategic vision provides a framework to help us achieve our financial goals of accelerated growth and enhanced profitability by:
Delivering value that gives our customers a competitive advantage;
Providing differentiated adaptable software-connected test systems based on open software and modular hardware, including cloud-enabled capabilities;
Focusing on industry-specific applications that benefit most from our differentiation;
Enhancing our software, systems and data offerings to more fully meet customers' enterprise-wide challenges; and
Aligning resources to the critical needs of our growth strategy to drive efficiency in our cost structure.
We are deliberate about the market opportunities we pursue to accelerate growth by targeting applications where we believe our systems can provide significant value to our customers. We believe our long-term track record for innovation and our differentiation in the market helps support the success of our customers, employees, community, and stockholders.
We utilize our expertise to partner with engineers and enterprises around the world to push the limits of innovation. We help our customers solve current and future test challenges, and reach speed, scale and efficiency across their product development cycle.
Business Evolution
Our business has undergone a transformation to improve performance, enhance customers engagements, and align investments to high growth opportunities. We remain focused on accelerating our strategy for sustainable long-term growth, executing on our business goals, winning in our markets, and delivering increased value to all stakeholders.
Company Culture: Core Values and Corporate Identity
We believe our financial performance in 2022 is a direct result of strategic changes made over the last several years. We believe the transparency of our strategy has enabled our employees to better understand how their role can make an impact toward achievement of our short- and long-term financial targets.
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We place a high degree of emphasis on employee engagement globally and believe that job satisfaction, clear career paths, and the difference our employees can make to our customers and society through engineering ambitiously will lead to a high performing global workforce. Our employees are a diverse community of problem-solvers who share a passion for positive impact and personal growth. Everyone brings something unique and is a vital member of an inclusive high performing team. When asked, NIers around the world say that our people are why they work here.
Our employee engagement scores have increased over the last three years when organizational change was at its highest. Successful retention of our talent is a key measure of our sustainability as an organization and thus a strategic focus for our executive leadership team.
Our Core Values are the principles that guide the way we behave, the work we do, and the decisions we make. They are the foundation of our culture and determine how we engage with our customers, communities, and each other.
Be Bold: As creative problem solvers, we challenge the status quo and think big to shape the future for ourselves, our customers, our communities, and our planet.
Be Kind: We value different perspectives and seek to help one another be more effective through candid feedback and a supportive community where everyone belongs.
Be Connectors: We are in this together. By sharing viewpoints and collaborating as one, we can sharpen, hone, and propel our best ideas forward.
We believe these values represent the strong culture of NI and how we want to be seen both internally at NI and externally with all our stakeholders. These are the values that we assess in both recruiting and retention.
Value for all our Stakeholders
We are focused on creating long-term value for all our stakeholders. Our ability to accelerate growth and generate profit delivers value to our customers, employees, stockholders, and community. Customers benefit from our continued investment in our technology and the expertise to support their success and technology needs. Employees benefit through the creation of opportunities for personal career growth and development. Stockholders benefit from receiving a solid return on the investment they make in us. Our success benefits our community of developers that build on our technology as well as the communities where we live, work, and give back.
graphic

Corporate Impact
We believe businesses of all kinds should be a leading force for good. This is the right thing to do and is vital to our long-term stability as part of a diverse and interconnected system — our company, our communities, and our planet — that must work together to survive and thrive. Our corporate impact work is critical to fulfilling the promise of NI’s 100-year plan: to deliver consistent, lasting value for all our stakeholders across time.
ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our corporate impact strategy outlines how we will put our people, partners, and products to work to benefit society and the planet. The strategy is based on a materiality analysis and interviews conducted with stakeholders, including NI stockholders, leaders, employees, suppliers, partners, and customers to identify the areas where our potential for impact meets our unique role as test and measurement engineering leaders. It sets out a vision for a more just and sustainable world that is focused on three core ideas: changing the faces of engineering; building an equitable and thriving society; and engineering a healthy planet. We measure our success through 15 ambitious goals for 2030. Progress to these goals and greater details on our corporate impact strategy can be found on our website at www.ni.com/en-us/about-ni/corporate-impact.html.
Proper governance of Environment, Social and Governance (“ESG”) programs and initiatives like these are structured to ensure efforts are truly cross-functional and collaborative while delivering on their goals.
The Board oversees ESG matters through its governance, audit, and compensation committees. Key members of the executive leadership team (“ELT”) provides management guidance through the Corporate Impact Council that meets regularly.
INVESTOR ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM
In recent years we have actively solicited the perspectives of many of our stockholders to help identify focus areas and priorities for the coming year. For example, outreach efforts in the fourth quarter of 2022 included requesting calls with our top 20 institutional stockholders. The discussions held with those who accepted our invitation were directed primarily toward the resiliency of our business and the importance of our culture. Topics of discussion included, among others: (i) elevation and progress of diversity initiatives since 2020; (ii) launch of our first Corporate Impact metrics report; (iii) our continued focus on environmental initiatives; and (iv) our executive compensation program.
Each year the constructive and candid feedback we receive during these investor meetings helps inform our priorities, assess our progress, and enhance our corporate governance practices and disclosures.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In prior years, we have taken action to enhance our governance practices in response to stockholder feedback. The following are some of the steps that we have taken in order to address issues our stockholders and other members of the investment community have identified as priorities.
graphic
We will continue to consider other actions we should take in response to our stockholder feedback and will continue to enhance our stockholder engagement program in order to consistently engage with, listen to, and learn from our stockholders.
Qualifications and Experience of Directors
In considering each of our directors, the Board and the Nomination & Governance Committee has evaluated a potential director’s background, qualifications, attributes and relevant skills. The Board and the Nomination & Governance Committee have considered those nomination criteria described below, as well as the value of the relationships directors have formed while working together on the Board and the deep knowledge of NI they have developed as a result of such service. The Board and the Nomination & Governance Committee also evaluated each of the director’s contributions to the Board and role in the operation of the Board as a whole.
We believe our director nominees bring a well-rounded variety of experiences, qualifications, attributes and relevant skills, and represent a balance of experience with NI and a fresh perspective. The table below summarizes some of the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of our directors. This high-level summary is not intended to
iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

be an exhaustive list of our directors’ skills or contributions to the Board, but an identification of special expertise or prominence that a particular director may bring to the Board as a whole. Further information on each director, including his or her specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, is set forth in the biographies of this Proxy Statement.
iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Directors’ Skills and Diverse Qualifications
graphic
v

TABLE OF CONTENTS


In addition, the Nomination & Governance Committee and the Board consider diversity in the characteristics of director candidates, including each candidate’s unique background, with the goal of enhancing the Board’s ability to effectively perform its oversight function.
Board Diversity Matrix (as of March 13, 2023)
graphic
Our Board is divided into three classes, with the terms of the Class II directors expiring this year. Upon recommendation from the Nomination & Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated Mr. Michael E. McGrath and Mr. Alexander M. Davern for election at the Annual Meeting to serve for a term of three years.
Michael McGrath
Independent
Alexander M. Davern
Director
Age: 73
Director Since: 2014
Committees: Audit, Nomination & Governance
Other Public Boards: 0
Age: 56
Director Since: 2017
Committees: None
Other Public Boards: 3
vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
General
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of National Instruments Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“NI” or the “Company”), has made proxy materials available to you on the Internetinternet or, upon your request, has delivered printed versions of proxy materials to you by mail, in connection with the Board’s solicitation of proxies for use at NI’s 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on May 5, 2020,9, 2023, at 9:00 AM, Central Daylight Time, or at any adjournments or postponements thereof, for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Due to the public health impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) and to support the well-being of our employees and stockholders, please note that theThe Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NATI2020.‌NATI2023.
Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), NI is furnishing proxy materials to NI’s stockholders on the Internet,internet, rather than mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials on the Internet.internet. If you received a noticeNotice of internet availabilityInternet Availability of proxy materialsProxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. We anticipate that the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be mailed to stockholders on or about March 24, 2020.27, 2023.
NI's corporate offices are located at 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Austin, Texas 78759. NI’s general corporate telephone number is (512) 683-0100.
Householding of Annual Meeting Materials
Some brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” Noticesnotices of Internet Availabilityinternet availability of Proxy Materials,proxy materials, proxy statements and annual reports. This means that, unless NI has received instructions to the contrary, only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials may have been sent to multiple stockholders living in the same household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials to any stockholder who contacts our investor relations department at 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Austin, Texas 78759-3504,78759, (512) 683-5215, requesting such copies. If stockholders living in the same household are receiving multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or the printed versions of such other proxy materials and would like to receive a single copy of these documents in the future, the stockholders should contact their broker, other nominee record holder, or our investor relations department to request mailing of a single copy of any of these documents.
Record Date; Outstanding Shares
Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 202013, 2023 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, 130,758,784131,496,338 shares of NI’s common stock, $0.01 par value, were issued and outstanding.
Voting and Solicitation
Every stockholder of record on the Record Date is entitled, for each share held, to one vote on each proposal that comes before the Annual Meeting. In the election of directors in Proposal One, each stockholder will be entitled to vote for two nominees and the two nominees with the greatest number of votes will be elected. However, pursuant to the terms of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, any nominee for director in an uncontested election who receives a greater number of “withhold” votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote. See “Proposal One: Election of Directors—Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of Directors” for additional information on these guidelines.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of NI common stock that are present at the meeting (electronically) or by proxy, and entitled to vote, will be required to approve Proposals Two, Three, and Four.
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of NI common stock that are present, in person (electronically) or by proxy, and entitled to vote, will be required to approve Proposals Two, Three and Four.
Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may vote on the Internet,internet, by telephone or, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, by completing, signing and mailing the proxy card enclosed therewith in the postage-prepaid envelope provided for that purpose. Voting over the Internet,internet, by telephone or by written proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, if you do not attend and vote via live webcast. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please review the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials you received in the mail or the proxy card if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials.
The cost of this solicitation will be borne by NI. NI may reimburse expenses incurred by brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners. Proxies may be solicited by certain of NI’s directors, officers and other employees, without additional compensation, personally, by telephone or by email.
In addition, NI has retained McKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist with proxy solicitation for an estimated fee of $15,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Treatment of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Abstentions
Abstentions will be counted for purposes of determining (i) the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, and (ii) for purposes of determining the number of outstanding shares entitled to vote and voted, in personat the meeting (electronically) or by proxy.proxy, and (iii) for purposes of determining the number of shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against Proposals Two, Three, and Four. There is no voting option to abstain with respect to Proposal One.
Broker Non-Votes
A broker will vote your shares only if the proposal is a matter on which your broker has discretion to vote (such as the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal Three)Four), or if you provide instructions on how to vote by following the instructions provided to you by your broker.
So long as a broker has discretion to vote on at least one item presented at the meeting, broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business. On other proposals for which the broker has expressly not voted, broker non-votes will not be counted: (i) as votes cast with respect to Proposal One, or (ii) for purposes of determining the number of outstanding shares entitled to vote, that are present in personat the meeting (electronically) or by proxy, with respect to proposalsProposals Two and Four, and (ii) as votes cast with respect to Proposal One.Three. Accordingly, broker nonvotesnon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the voting on ProposalsProposal One, Two and Four.or Three. There shouldwill be no broker non-votes with respect to Proposal Three.Four.
Tabulation and Reporting of Voting Results
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be tallied by the inspector of election after the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting. NI will publish the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
Revocability of Proxies
Proxies given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time before they have been used. You may change or revoke your proxy by entering a new vote by Internetinternet or by telephone or by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Secretary of NI or by completing a new proxy card bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy instructions). Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Stockholders of NI may submit proper proposals for inclusion in NI’s Proxy Statementour proxy statement and for consideration at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 20212024 by submitting their proposals in writing to the Secretary of NI in a timely manner. In order to be considered for inclusion in NI’s proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021,2023, stockholder proposals must be received by the Secretary of NI no later than November 24, 2020,27, 2023 and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Under NI’s amended and restated bylaws (the “Bylaws”), a stockholder (or a group of not more than 20 stockholders) that has held at least 3% of NI’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate and include in our proxy materials for our 20212024 annual meeting, director nominees constituting up to the greater of (i) 20% of the number of personsdirectors serving on the Board oras of November 27, 2023 and (ii) two directors, provided that such nominees do not exceed half of the directors to be elected at an annual meeting and that the requirements set forth in the Bylaws are satisfied. To utilize such “proxy access” nomination process, among other things, the electing stockholder(s) and proposed nominee(s) must comply with the detailed requirements set forth in the Bylaws, including the provision of the proposing stockholder information, various other required information, representations, undertakings, agreements and other requirements as set forth in the Bylaws and as required by law. One such requirement is that the nomination(s) must be received in a timely manner between 120 days and 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date our proxy statement was first sent to stockholders in connection with the last annual meeting, which for our proxy materials for the 20212024 annual meeting would be no earlier than October 25, 202028, 2023 and no later than November 24, 2020.27, 2023.
The Bylaws establish an advance notice procedure with regard to business to be brought before an annual meeting, including stockholder proposals not included in NI’s Proxy Statement.proxy statement. Except as provided above, for director nominations or other business to be properly brought before NI’s 20212024 annual meeting by a stockholder, such stockholder must deliver written notice to the Secretary of NI at NI’s principal executive office no later than January 23, 202126, 2024 and no earlier than December 24, 2020.27, 2023. If the date of NI’s 20212024 annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 calendar days from the first anniversary date of the 2020this Annual Meeting, a stockholder’s notice of a proposal will be timely if it is received by NI by the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to the 20212024 annual meeting and (ii) the 10th day following the day NI first publicly announces the date of the 20212024 annual meeting.
The proxy grants the proxy holders discretionary authority to vote on any matter raised at the Annual Meeting.an annual meeting of stockholders. If a stockholder fails to comply with the foregoing notice provisions, proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary voting authority on such matter should the stockholder proposal come before the 20212024 annual meeting.
The description of certain provisions of the Bylaws above is intended as a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates. A copy of the full text of the Bylaw provisions governing the notice requirements set forth above may be obtained by writing to the Secretary of NI. All notices of proposals and director nominations by stockholders should be sent to National Instruments Corporation, 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Building C, Austin, Texas 78759, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
General
NI’s Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the term of the office of one class expiring each year. The authorized number of directors which constitutes the entire Board of Directors is currently ten,eight, with three directors in Class I, threetwo directors in Class II, and fourthree directors in Class III.
The terms of office of our Class II directors will expire at the Annual Meeting and include Mr. Michael E. McGrath and Mr. Alexander M. Davern, and Mr. Jeffrey L. Kodosky will expire at the 2020 annual meeting. On January 29, 2020, Mr. Kodosky informed theDavern. Our Board that he would not stand for re-election as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting. There was no disagreement or dispute between Mr. Kodosky and NI that led to his decision not to stand for re-election. Mr. Kodosky continues to hold the position within NI of Business and Technology Fellow and provides NI with direction and development for LabVIEW and other software technologies.
NI’s Board of Directors has nominated Mr. Michael E. McGrath and Mr. Alexander M. Davern for election at the Annual Meeting as Class II directors to serve for a term of three years.
The terms of office of Class III directors Ms. Gayla J. Delly, Dr. Gerhard P. Fettweis, and Ms. Duy-Loan T. Le and Mr. Charles J. Roesslein will expire at the 20212024 annual meeting. The terms of office of our Class I directors Mr. James E. Cashman, III, Mr. Liam K. Griffin, and Mr. Eric H. Starkloff will expire at the 20222025 annual meeting.
Under the listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), a majority of the Board of Directors must be comprised of independent directors. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Cashman, Ms. Delly, Dr. Fettweis, Mr. Griffin, Ms. Le, Mr. McGrath, and Mr. RoessleinMcGrath is independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.standards.
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of Directors
Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes. Each stockholder will be entitled to vote for two nominees and the two nominees receiving the greatest number of affirmative votes of the shares present in personat the meeting (electronically) or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, and entitled to vote in the election of directors, shall be elected to the Board of Directors.Board. Votes withheld from any director are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Cumulative voting is not permitted by NI’s Certificate of Incorporation.
UnderPursuant to NI’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, any nominee for director in an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the only nominees are those recommended by the Board) who receives a greater number of “withhold” votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election, shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the stockholder vote. In such event, the Nomination and& Governance Committee will promptly consider the tendered resignation and will recommend to the Board whether to accept the tendered resignation or to take some other action, such as rejecting the tendered resignation and addressing the apparent underlying causes of the “withheld”“withhold” votes. In making this recommendation, the Nomination and& Governance Committee will consider all factors deemed relevant by its members including, without limitation, the underlying reasons why stockholders “withheld”withheld votes for election from such director (if ascertainable), the length of service and qualifications of the director whose resignation has been tendered, the director’s contributions to NI, whether by accepting such resignation NI will no longer be in compliance with any applicable law, rule, regulation or governing document, and whether or not accepting the resignation is in the best interests of NI and its stockholders.
The Board will promptly act on the Nomination and& Governance Committee’s recommendation no later than 90 days following its receipt of such recommendation. In considering the Nomination and& Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Board will consider the factors considered by the Nomination and& Governance Committee and such additional information and factors the Board believes to be relevant.
Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for NI’s nominees named below. If any nominee of NI is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who is designated by the present Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. It is not currently expected that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the nominees listed below.
4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting
The Nomination and& Governance Committee, consisting solely of independent directors as determined under applicable Nasdaq listing standards, recommended the two individuals set forth in the table below for nomination by our full Board of Directors.Board. Based on such recommendation, our Board of Directors nominated such directors for election at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Michael E. McGrath is independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act. The following sets forth information concerning the nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, including information as to each nominee’s age as of the Record Date, current principal occupation and business experience.


graphic
Michael E. McGrath, 7073 - Director since May 2014; Former Chief Executive Officer of i2 Technologies and Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath, Business Strategy Consultant.
Business Experience: Mr. McGrath is an experienced executive, director, entrepreneur and author. His areas of expertise include strategy, product development, decision-making techniques, supply chain, and autonomous vehicles. He served as a director of i2 Technologies, a public company and supply chain management and software services company,vendor, from September 2004 to May 2008, and as its CEO and President from February 2005 to July 2007. He served on the board of directors of Entrust, Inc., a public company, from February 2007, and as Chairman of the Board starting in November 2008, until the company was sold in July 2009. He served as executive chairman of the board of The Thomas Group, a public company, from February 2008 to March 2012, and as acting CEO for a period of time. The Thomas Group filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2012. He also served on the board of Sensable Technologies from 2000 until 2009 and served on the board of Revolution Analytics from 2014 until 2015. He was a founder and the Chief Executive Officer of Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath, a global management consulting firm, for 28 years, retiring from the firm in July 2004. Mr. McGrath is the author of Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Strategies, and Disruptions; Product Strategy for High-Technology Companies; Business Decisions!; and other books. Mr. McGrath received his bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from Boston College, and his master’s degree in Business Administration from Harvard Business School.
The Board concluded that Mr. McGrath should serve as a director because he has an extensive background in product development strategy, strategic product marketing, and software services. Having served as CEO of i2 Technologies, a vendor of supply chain management software, he has knowledge of software systems, experience selling into corporate opportunities, and experience developing large accounts. In particular, he has experience with management functions including software marketing and sales force management activities, and software development. He is an experienced consultant and author with knowledge of cloud computing and smartmobile applications, which are relevant for NI’s business. Mr. McGrath currently serves as theour Chair of the Board of Directors. He servesas well as a member of theour Audit Committee and Chaira member of theour Nomination and& Governance Committee.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS


graphic
Alexander M. Davern, 5356 - Director since January 2017; Former Chief Executive Officer of NI.
Business Experience: Mr. Davern joined NI in February 1994 and served as Chief Executive Officer from January 2017 to FebruaryJanuary 2020 and as Strategic Advisor from January 2020 to May 2020. He previously served as President from January 2017 to October 2018. He served as Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from October 2010 to December 2016. Mr. Davern also served as NI’s Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, IT and Manufacturing Operations and Treasurer from December 2002 to October 2010; as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from December 1997 to December 2002; as Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from July 1997 to December 1997; and previously as Corporate Controller and International Controller. Prior to joining NI, Mr. Davern worked both in Europe and in the United States for the international accounting firm of Price Waterhouse, LLP. Mr. Davern received his bachelor’s degree in Commerce and a diploma in professional accounting from University College in Dublin, Ireland. Mr. Davern is a director of Cirrus Logic, Inc., a US publicly traded company.company, and is chair of its Audit Committee. Mr. Davern is also a director of FARO Technologies, Inc., a US publicly traded company, and is chair of its Audit Committee, and is Chairman of the Board of ESI-Group, a French public company, and is a member of its Strategic Committee.
The Board concluded that Mr. Davern should serve as a director because of his former role as NI’s Chief Executive Officer and because he has held other executive officer positions with NI for over 1920 years. In these roles, Mr. Davern has gained extensive knowledge of NI’s business, financial and operations matters, and the Board believes that Mr. Davern is well suited to help define and execute NI’s corporate strategy. Mr. Davern also serves as a director for Cirrus Logic, Inc., another publicly traded company, and has strong expertise in governance matters.
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INCUMBENT DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS OF OFFICE

CONTINUE AFTER THE ANNUAL MEETING
The following sets forth information concerning the other directors whose terms of office continue after the Annual Meeting, including information as to each director’s age as of the Record Date, current principal occupation and business experience.


graphic
James E. Cashman, III, 6669 - Director since March 2019; Former Board Chairman of ANSYS, Inc; Former President and Chief Executive Officer of ANSYS, Inc.
Business Experience: Mr. Cashman was Chairman from January 2017 through April 2019 of the board of directors ANSYS Inc., an engineering simulation software company, from January 2017 through April 2019.company. Prior to becoming Chairman of ANSYS, Mr. Cashman was the Chief Executive Officer and a director of ANSYS from February 2000 through December 2016. Prior to his general management role with ANSYS, Mr. Cashman served as Senior Vice President of Operations of ANSYS from September 1997 to April 1999. He also served from 1995 to 1997, as Vice President of Marketing and International Operations at PAR Technology Corporation, a computer software and hardware company, and from 1992 to 1994, he was Vice President of Product Development and Marketing at Metaphase Technology, Inc., a product data management company, which was a joint venture of Structural Dynamics Research Corporation and Control Data Systems. From 1976 to 1992, he worked in various sales and technical positions at Structural Dynamics Research Corporation, a computer-aided design company. Mr. Cashman holds a bachelor’s degreeand master’s degrees in Mechanical Engineering and a master’s degree in Business Administration, bothall from the University of Cincinnati. Mr. Cashman is the Chairman of the board of directors of Certara, Inc., a publicly traded company, and is a member of its Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees.
The Board concluded that Mr. Cashman should be nominated and serve as a director because he brings a wealth of experience in the areas of technical, financial, operations and sales management and has been key to the success of numerous computer-aided design, product data management, transaction processing, and computer-aided engineering companies. In each role, Mr. Cashman has focused on developing clarity-of-vision and giving appropriate guidance to provide strong leadership. He serves as a member of theour Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and a memberChair of the Compensationour Nomination & Governance Committee.
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS



graphic
Gayla J. Delly, 6063 - Director since March 2020; Former Chief Executive Officer of Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
Business Experience: Ms. Delly served as Chief Executive Officer of Benchmark Electronics Inc. (“Benchmark”), a company that provides contract manufacturing, design, engineering, test and distribution services to manufacturers of computers, medical devices, telecommunications equipment and industrial control and test instruments from January 2012 to September 2016 and served on the board of directors of Benchmark from 2011 to September 2016. At Benchmark, she previously served as President from 2006 to December 2011, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2006, and as Corporate Controller and Treasurer from 1995 to 2001. Ms. Delly is a certified public accountant and was a senior audit manager at KPMG before joining Benchmark. Ms. Delly serves as an independent directoris currently a member of the board of directors of Broadcom Inc., a public company, listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and is a member of its Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since January 2008, Ms. Delly has served as an independent directora member of the board of directors of Flowserve Corporation, a public company, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and serves as a member of its Organization and Compensation Committee and thechair of its Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. Ms. Delly previously served as chair of Flowserve’s audit committeeAudit Committee from 2015 to May 2019. Ms. Delly received her bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Samford University.
The Board concluded that Ms. Delly’s qualifications toDelly should serve on our Board includeas a director because of her leadership experience in senior executive and financial management positions, her international manufacturing experience, her education and experience as an accounting professional, as well as her public company board and committee experience. The Board has not appointed Ms. Delly to serve on any committeesShe currently serves as the Chair of the Board at this time.our Audit Committee, a member of our Compensation Committee and a member of our Nomination & Governance Committee.


graphic
Gerhard P. Fettweis, PhD, 5761 - Director since March 2016; Vodafone Chair Professor at the Technical University of Dresden.
Business Experience:Since September 1994, Dr. Fettweis has served as the Vodafone Chair Professor of Electrical Engineering at the Technical University of Dresden, where his research focuses on next generation wireless systems. In connection with that role, he has spun-out twelve startup companies from the university. From August 2015 to February 2016, he served as a visiting professor at the University of California at Berkeley and as a senior researcher at the International Computer Science Institute. Dr. Fettweis is a member of the German National Academy of Science “Leopoldina” and German National Academy of Engineering “acatech” and a fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”). He has received numerous awards recognizing his contributions in the field of electrical engineering. Dr. Fettweis has authored or co-authored two books and is listed as an inventor on over thirty issued patents. Dr. Fettweis received his Dipl.-Ing. in Electrical Engineering in 1986 and his PhD in Electrical Engineering in 1990, each from Aachen University of Technology. Mr. Fettweis is currently a member of the technical advisory board of Sequans Communications S.A., a publicly traded French company.
The Board concluded that Dr. Fettweis should serve as a director because of his strong technical background and extensive knowledge in electrical engineering, as well as his experience in science, technology and business. Additionally, he is very involved in the scientific community and has leadership and management experience through his role as the Vodafone Chair Professor at the Technical University of Dresden. He currently serves as a member of theour Audit Committee and a member of theour Compensation Committee.
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS


graphic
Liam K. Griffin, 5356 - Director since March 2019; President, Chief Executive Officer, and DirectorChairman of Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Business Experience:Mr. Griffin is the President, and Chief Executive Officer and a directorChairman of the board of directors of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (“Skyworks”). Prior to his appointment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the board of directors of Skyworks in May 2021 and May 2016, respectively, he had served as director and President of Skyworks since May 2014.2016 and May 2014, respectively. Mr. Griffin also served in the following positions at Skyworks: from November 2012 to May 2014, as Executive Vice President and Corporate General Manager,Manager; from May 2011 to November 2012, as Executive Vice President, High Performance Analog,Analog; and from August 2001 to May 2011, as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing. He also served from 1995 to 2001 as Vice President of North American Sales and then Vice President of Worldwide Sales at Vectron International, a division of Dover Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Griffin was a Marketing Manager at AT&T Microelectronics, Inc. and a Product and Process Engineer at AT&T Network Systems. Mr. Griffin holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts-Amherst and a master’s degree in Business Administration from Boston University. He is currentlypreviously served as a director of Vicor Corporation, a publicly traded company.company, from 2009 to 2019.
The Board concluded that Mr. Griffin should serve as a director because of his breadth of leadership experience and in-depth understanding of the semiconductor industry and its competitive landscape gained through serving in several different executive positions at Skyworks over the past 1516 years. His service as a director for Vicor Corporation gives Mr. Griffin added perspective as to the challenges confronting public technology companies. In considering the independence of Mr. Griffin, it was noted that Mr. Griffin is Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Skyworks and that NI has a commercial relationship with Skyworks and, received revenue of approximately $963,235 ($960,002 net of credits) from sales to Skyworks in the ordinary course of business for the year ended December 31, 2019.2022, had transactions with Skyworks totaling $1,000,298 in the ordinary course of business. Given the relative size of the businesses of NI and Skyworks, it was determined that such relationship was not a “material interest” under applicable SEC and Nasdaq regulations. He serves as a member of the Compensation Committee and a member of theour Nomination and& Governance Committee.
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS


graphic
Duy-Loan T. Le, 5760 - Director since September 2002; Former Senior Fellow of Texas Instruments, Inc.
Business Experience: Ms. Le retired in July 2017 from Texas Instruments Inc. (“TI”), one of the leading semiconductor companies in the world. Ms. Le was elected Senior Fellow in 2002 and is the only woman in TI’s history elected to this highest Fellow rank. She held various leadership positions at TI, including Advanced Technology Ramp Manager for the Embedded Processing Division and worldwide project manager for the Memory Division. While at TI, Ms. Le led all aspects of execution for advanced technology nodes, including silica technology development, design, assembly and test, productization, qualification, release to market, high volume ramp, and quality and reliability assurance. She has experience opening international offices and developing engineering talent for the TI business. Ms. Le has been awarded 24 patents. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin and a master’s degree in Business Administration from the Bauer College of Business at the University of Houston. Ms. Le is currently a directormember of Ballard Power Systems, a publicly traded company; CREE,the board of directors of Wolfspeed, Inc., a publicly traded company;company, and a member of its Compensation and Governance and Nominations Committees; a member of the board of directors of Atomera, Inc., a publicly traded company.company, Chair of its Compensation Committee and a member of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and a member of the board of directors of BrainChip Holdings Ltd., a publicly traded company, and a member of its Audit & Risk and Remuneration & Nominations Committees.
The Board concluded that Ms. Le should serve as a director because she has extensive experience managing platform-based product development and is a results-oriented and highly accomplished technology executive with extensive experience in various aspects of semiconductor design and manufacture, including operations, research and development, product launch, customer interfacing, foundry partnership, and supply chain management while at TI. She also managed global R&D centers for TI, and these centers span multiple countries, disciplines, businesses, and organizations across TI. She has over 20 years of process manufacturing experience. These skills and knowledge are relevant for NI’s business. She serves as Chair of theour Compensation Committee and a member of theour Nomination and& Governance Committee.

Charles J. Roesslein, 71 - Director since July 2000; Former Chief Executive Officer of Austin Tele-Services, LLC.
Business Experience: Mr. Roesslein was the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Austin Tele-Services, LLC, which is in the secondary market for telecom and IT assets, from 2004 until 2016, when his interests were sold. During 2000, Mr. Roesslein served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President of Prodigy Communications Corporation, an internet service provider. He served as President of SBC-CATV, a cable television service provider, from 1999 until 2000, and as President of SBC Technology Resources, the applied research division of SBC Communications Inc., from 1997 until 1999. Prior to 1997, Mr. Roesslein served in executive officer positions with SBC Communications, Inc. and Southwestern Bell. Mr. Roesslein holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia and a master’s degree in Finance from the University of Missouri-Kansas City. Mr. Roesslein is currently a director of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc., a publicly traded company, since May 2002.
The Board concluded that Mr. Roesslein should serve as a director because he brings a wealth of financial and executive experience to the Board including extensive experience in the development of large accounts while serving Southwestern Bell Corporation’s customers. He also has a strong financial background, having served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southwestern Bell Publications and as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company. Mr. Roesslein has an extensive high level background in the telecom industry and in telecom technologies. He serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee.
graphic
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Eric H. Starkloff, 4548 - Director since February 2020; President and Chief Executive Officer of NI.
Business Experience: Mr. Starkloff joined NI in July 1997 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2020. Previously, Mr. Starkloff served as President and Chief Operating Officer sincefrom October 2018.2018 to February 2020. He has also served as Executive Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing from February 2014 to October 2018; Senior Vice President of Marketing from April 2013 to January 2014; Vice President of Marketing from November 2010 to March 2013; and Vice President of Product Marketing from October 2008 to October 2010. During his tenure at NI, Mr. Starkloff has also held the positions of Director of Product Marketing; Product Marketing Manager; and Applications Engineer. Mr. Starkloff received his bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia.
The Board concluded that Mr. Starkloff should serve as a director because he is NI’s President and Chief Executive Officer and has held other positions with NI for over 2325 years. In these roles, Mr. Starkloff has gained extensive knowledge of NI’s business, financial and operations matters, and the Board believes that Mr. Starkloff is well suited to help define and execute NI’s corporate strategy.
There is no family relationship between any of our directors, director director nomineenominees or executive officer of NI.officers (which we define as those persons designated by the Board from time to time as officers as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act, and which we refer to herein as “Executive Officers”).
1110

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of NI’s common stock as of the Record DateMarch 13, 2023 (the “Table Date”), unless otherwise indicated, by (i) by all personseach person known to NI, based solely on statements filed by such persons pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Exchange Act, to be the beneficial ownersowner of more than 5% of NI’s common stock, (ii) by each of the named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as defined and set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation,” (iii) by each director and director nominee, and (iv) by all current directors and executive officersExecutive Officers as a group:
Name of Person or Entity
Number of
Shares (1)
Approximate
Percentage
Owned (2)
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
17,704,097(3)
13.54%
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
13,786,517(4)
10.54%
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
11,970,552(5)
9.15%
Janus Henderson Group PLC
201 Bishopsgate
United Kingdom EC2M 3AE
9,711,469(6)
7.43%
Jeffrey L. Kodosky
1,680,905(7)
1.29%
Alexander M. Davern
315,017(8)
*%
Eric H. Starkloff
87,876(9)
*%
Karen M. Rapp
28,728(10)
*%
Scott A. Rust
30,917(11)
*%
John C. Roiko
22,909(12)
*%
Charles J. Roesslein
108,714(13)
*%
Duy-Loan T. Le
106,485(14)
*%
Michael E. McGrath
29,802(15)
*%
Gerhard P. Fettweis
17,684(16)
*%
James E. Cashman, III
4,932(17)
*%
Liam K. Griffin
4,932(18)
*%
Gayla J. Delly
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)
2,447,731(19)
1.87%
Name of Person or Entity
Number of
Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially
Owned (1)
Percent of
Common Stock
Owned (2)
The Vanguard Group (3)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
13,210,667
​10.05%
BlackRock, Inc. (4)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
12,045,874
9.16%
Janus Henderson Group PLC (5)
201 Bishopsgate
United Kingdom EC2M 3AE
8,885,010
6.76%
T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. (6)
101 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
8,097,540
6.16%
Eric H. Starkloff (7)
269,266
*%
Karen M. Rapp (8)
103,074
*%
Scott A. Rust (9)
50,596
*%
Jason E. Green
27,065
*%
Ritu Favre (10)
28,206
*%
Alexander M. Davern (11)
279,850
*%
Duy-Loan T. Le (12)
121,775
*%
Michael E. McGrath (13)
47,092
*%
Gerhard P. Fettweis (14)
33,685
*%
James E. Cashman, III (15)
21,501
*%
Liam K. Griffin (16)
21,501
*%
Gayla J. Delly (17)
18,560
*%
All current Executive Officers and directors as a group (12 persons)(18)
912,674
*%
*

Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.stock as of the Table Date.
(1)

Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.
The number in the “Number of shares of common stock beneficial owned” column represents shares of NI’s common stock held, and the time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) held that will vest within 60 days of the Table Date. The number does not include the RSUs that vest more than 60 days of the Table Date. RSUs are awards granted by NI and payable, subject to vesting requirements, in shares of NI’s common stock.
(2)

For each individual and group included in the table, percentage owned is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group as described above by the sum of (i) the 130,758,784131,496,338 shares of common stock outstanding on March 6, 2020,the Table Date, and (ii) the number of shares of common stockRSUs held that such person or group had the right to acquire on orwill vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020, including time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”).after the Table Date.
(3)

The informationRepresents shares of NI’s common stock beneficially owned as to beneficial ownership isof December 31, 2022, based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020, reflecting beneficial ownership9, 2023 by The Vanguard Group. The Vanguard Group has shared voting power
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with respect to 46,911 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 13,033,948 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 176,719 shares of common stock.
(4)
Represents shares of NI’s common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2019.2022, based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 24, 2023 by Blackrock, Inc. The Schedule 13G/A states that T. Rowe Price Associates,BlackRock, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries havehas sole voting power with respect to 5,797,88911,722,039 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 17,704,09712,045,874 shares of common stock.
(4)
(5)
The informationRepresents shares of NI’s common stock beneficially owned as to beneficial ownership isof December 31, 2022, based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 4, 2020, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2019.10, 2023 by Janus Henderson Group PLC. The Schedule 13G/A states that BlackRock,Janus Henderson Group PLC has shared voting power with respect to 8,885,010 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 8,885,010 shares of common stock.
(6)
Represents shares of NI's common stock beneficial owned as of December 31, 2022, based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023 by T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. and/orThe Schedule 13G states that T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 3,296,600 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 8,097,540 shares of common stock.
(7)
Includes 51,744 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Mr. Starkloff.
(8)
Includes 16,930 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Ms. Rapp.
(9)
Includes 14,527 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Mr. Rust.
(10)
Includes 15,259 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Ms. Favre and 6,383 shares held by the Ritu Favre Survivor's Trust.
(11)
Includes 5,037 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Mr. Davern and 90,000 shares held by the Davern 2021 Irrevocable Trust.
(12)
Includes 5,037 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Ms. Le.
(13)
Includes 5,037 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Mr. McGrath.
(14)
Includes 5,037 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Dr. Fettweis.
(15)
Includes 5,037 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Mr. Cashman.
(16)
Includes 5,037 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Mr. Griffin.
(17)
Includes 6,522 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date for Ms. Delly.
(18)
Includes 124,458 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of the Table Date.
12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

its subsidiaries have sole voting power with respect to 12,355,577 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 13,786,517 shares of common stock.
(5)
The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2019. The Schedule 13G/A states that The Vanguard Group and/or its subsidiaries have sole voting power with respect to 65,938 shares of common stock, shared voting power with respect to 20,168 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 11,901,650 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 68,902 shares of common stock.
(6)
The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020, reflecting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2019. The Schedule 13G/A states that Janus Henderson Group PLC and/or its subsidiaries have shared voting power with respect to 9,711,469 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 9,711,469 shares of common stock.
(7)
Includes an aggregate of 816,600 shares held in two trusts for the benefit of Mr. Kodosky’s daughters for which Mr. Kodosky is the trustee; includes 74,529 shares held by a non-profit corporation of which Mr. Kodosky is president and his wife, Gail T. Kodosky, is secretary; includes 80,000 shares held by a charitable remainder trust for the benefit of Mr. Kodosky and his wife; includes 6,000 shares held in a charitable remainder trust for the benefit of Mr. Kodosky’s brother of which Mr. Kodosky is the sole trustee with investment power over the securities held therein; includes an aggregate of 55,620 shares held in three trusts for non-immediate family members of Mr. Kodosky of which Mr. Kodosky is the sole trustee with investment power over the securities held therein; and includes 323,373 shares owned by his wife. Mr. Kodosky disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by his wife. Includes 1,054 shares subject to RSUs of Mr. Kodosky which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020. Cumulatively, Jeffrey and Gail Kodosky control and/or beneficially own a total of 1,680,905 shares.
(8)
Includes 54,417 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020, plus an additional 52,108 shares that may accelerate on or about May 5, 2020, pursuant to Mr. Davern's Transition Agreement (defined below).
(9)
Includes 50,977 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(10)
Includes 14,336 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(11)
Includes 17,304 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(12)
Includes 4,567 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(13)
Includes 6,139 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(14)
Includes 6,139 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(15)
Includes 6,139 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(16)
Includes 6,139 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(17)
Includes 4,932 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(18)
Includes 4,932 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
(19)
Includes 244,086 shares subject to RSUs which vest within 60 days of March 6, 2020.
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Responsiveness to Investors
In recent years we have actively solicited the perspectives of many of our stockholders to help identify focus areas and priorities for the coming year. For example, outreach efforts in the third quarter of 2019 included requesting calls with our top 20 institutional stockholders. The discussions that were held with those who accepted our invitation were directed primarily toward our recent Chief Executive Officer change, our focus on increasing Board diversity, and the elevation of our environmental and social focus and corporate social responsibility initiatives.
The constructive and candid feedback we receive during these meetings is important and helps us inform our priorities, assess our progress, and enhance our corporate governance practices and disclosures each year.
In our stockholder engagement calls that took place from November 2019 through January 2020 stockholders expressed:
positive feedback about our appointment of Mr. Starkloff as Chief Executive Officer, with our stockholders generally appreciating that Mr. Starkloff has been involved from the outset in the development of our core strategic vision, operating model, and plans toward achieving our goals;
appreciation of our continued focus on revenue growth, operating margin and employee retention, with our stockholders acknowledging a desire to see sustainable revenue growth going forward in addition to the success we have had in maintaining our operating margin throughout the economic cycle;
recognition of our achievement of our non-GAAP operating margin target through operational efficiency;
appreciation of our efforts to identify and attract diverse candidates to serve on our Board;
appreciation of our efforts to align on our corporate social responsibility activities, with the hiring of a Director of CSR and monetary funding of the program viewed as positive;
views as to what information about our environmental, social and corporate social responsibility efforts would be helpful to them; and
positive reaction to the overall reduction in the average age and tenure of the Board.
Our Board and our company value and consider the feedback we receive from our stockholders and have taken action to enhance our governance practices in response to those perspectives.
The following are some of the steps that we have taken, either on our own initiative or in response to feedback from our stockholders, that address issues our stockholders and members of the investment community in general have identified as important.

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We continue to consider other actions we can take in response to our stockholder feedback and plan to continue to enhance our program to drive consistent engagement and to listen and learn from our stockholders while forming strong relationships in the process.
Board Meetings and Committees
The Board of Directors of NI held a total of seventwelve meetings during 2019.2022. The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nomination and& Governance Committee.
During 2019,2022, all directors attended 100% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served.they served, except for Mr. Griffin and Ms. Le, who each missed one meeting. NI encourages, but does not require, its boardBoard members to attend NI’s annual meeting of stockholders. In 2019, five2022, all of our directors attended NI’sour virtual annual stockholder meeting.meeting, other than Mr. Griffin and Ms. Delly.
Board Leadership Structure and Risk Management
In September 2018, the Board appointed Mr. McGrath, an independent member of the Board, as Chair of the Board of Directors.Board. In such role, Mr. McGrath is responsible for coordinating the activities of the Board, chairing all meetings of the Board, developing agendas for such meetings, building a productive relationship between the Board and theour President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in NI’sof our strategy, risk oversight and succession planning. The Board believes its current leadership structure best serves the objectives of the Board’s oversight of management, the Board’s ability to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of NI’sour stockholders, and NI’sour overall corporate governance. The Board also believes that the separation of the Chair and our President and CEO roles allows the President and CEO to focus his time and energy on operating and managing NI, while leveraging the Chair’s experience and perspectives. The Board periodically reviews its leadership structure to determine whether it continues to best serve NI and its stockholders.
The NIOur Board oversees risk management in a number of ways.ways, and cybersecurity incidents on enterprise risk and crises response. The full Board receives an annual report with respect to our enterprise risk management process, as well as reports on various risk related items at least twice per year and otherwise as relevant, including risks related to our manufacturing operations, cybersecurity, trade compliance, intellectual property, taxes, products, and employees. The full Board also receives periodic reports on our efforts to manage such risks through safety measures and insurance. The Audit Committee oversees the management of financial and accounting related risks as an integral part of its duties. The Audit Committee also receives reports on ethics and compliance matters quarterly and otherwise as relevant. Similarly, the Compensation Committee considers risk management when setting the compensation policies and programs for NI’sour executive officers and other employees. The full
Cybersecurity is a risk area with oversight at the highest levels of the organization, including the Executive level and Board. Other than risk oversight from the Board, of Directors receives anwe also require all employees to take annual report with respect to NI's enterprise risk management process. In addition, the full Board of Directors receives reportssecurity awareness training which includes training on various risk related items at each of its regular meetings including risks related to NI manufacturing operations, cybersecurity, trade compliance, intellectual property, taxes, products and employees. The Board also receives periodic reports on NI’s efforts to manage such risks through safety measures, insurance or self-insurance.information security.
Communications to the Board of Directors
Stockholders may communicate with any member or members of the Board of Directors by mail addressed to the Chair, any other individual member or members of the Board, to the full Board, or to a particular committee of the Board. In each case, such correspondence should be sent to the following address: 11500 North Mopac Expressway, Building C, Austin, Texas 78759, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Correspondence received that is addressed to the members of the Board of Directors will be reviewed by NI’s General Counselour Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and Secretary or his designee, who will forward such correspondence to the appropriate member or members of the Board of Directors.Board.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which currently consists of directors CharlesGayla J. RoessleinDelly (Chair), James E. Cashman, III, Gerhard P. Fettweis, and Michael E. McGrath, met five times during 2019.2022. The Audit Committee appoints, compensates, retains, and oversees the engagement of NI’sour independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with such independent registered public accounting firm the plan, scope, and results of their examination of NI’sour consolidated financial statements and reviews the independence of such independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee maintains free and open communication with NI’sour independent registered public accounting firm and the internal audit department, overseeing the internal audit function and NI’sour management team. The Audit Committee inquires about any significant financial risks or exposures and assesses the steps management has taken to minimize such risksexposures to NI, including the adequacy of insurance coverage and the strategy for management of foreign
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

currency risk. The Audit Committee also reviews NI’sour compliance with matters relating to environmental, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission export and SEC regulations. The Audit Committee has established procedures to promote and protect employee reporting of (i) suspected fraud or wrongdoing relating to accounting, auditing or financial reporting matters and (ii) complaints and concerns regarding a violation of the federal securities laws,
15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

including (A) receiving, retaining and addressing complaints received by NI relating to such matters, (B) enabling employees to submit on a confidential and anonymous basis any concerns regarding such matters;matters, and (C) protecting reporting employees from retaliation. The Board of Directors believeshas determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” as that term is defined by the Nasdaq listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. RoessleinCashman, Ms. Delly, Dr. Fettweis, and Mr. McGrath is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC rules. The charter of the Audit Committee is available on NI’s website at http:https://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/us/audit_committee_charter.pdf.investor.ni.com/corporate-governance.
Nomination and& Governance Committee
The Nomination and& Governance Committee, which currently consists of directors Michael E. McGrath (Chair), James E. Cashman, III (Chair), Liam K. Griffin, and Duy-Loan T. Le and Michael E. McGrath, met five times during 2022. The Board has determined that each member of whom was deemed to bethe Nomination & Governance Committee is an “independent director” as that term is defined by the Nasdaq listing standards, met four times during 2019.standards. The Nomination and& Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directorsdetermines the selection criteria for board members, recommends to the Board compensation of outside directors (with advice from Compensia, Inc., a national independent compensation consulting firm (“Compensia”), also engaged by the Compensation Committee) and appointment of board committee members and committee chairpersons, and develops board governance principles.
The Nomination and& Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders provided such recommendations are made in accordance with procedures described in this Proxy Statement under “Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals.” When considering a potential director candidate, the Nomination and& Governance Committee looks for demonstrated character, judgment, relevant business, functional and industry experience, and a high degree of acumen. The Nomination and& Governance Committee also considers issues of diversity, such as age, education, gender, professional experience, membership in a minority or underrepresented community, and differences in viewpoints and skills. The Nomination and& Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, the Board of Directors and the Nomination and& Governance Committee believe that it is important that the members of the Board of Directors represent diverse viewpoints. The Nomination and& Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees typically involves a series of internal discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. There are no differences in the manner in which the Nomination and& Governance Committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder. The Nomination and Governance Committee engaged Trewstar Corporate Board Services (“Trewstar”), an executive search firm, to assist the committee in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. As part of its engagement, Trewstar identified Gayla J. Delly as a nominee for director.
The charter of the Nomination and& Governance Committee is available on NI’s website at http:https://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/us/n_and_g_charter_final.pdf.investor.ni.com/corporate-governance.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, which currently consists of directors Duy-Loan T. Le (Chair), James E. Cashman, III, Gayla J. Delly, and Gerhard P. Fettweis, Liam K. Griffin, and Charles J. Roesslein,met six times during 2022. The Board has determined that each member of whom was deemed to bethe Compensation Committee is an “independent director” as that term is defined by applicable SEC rules and the Nasdaq listing standards and other requirements, met six times during 2019.standards. The charter of the Compensation Committee is available on NI’sour website at http:https://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/us/comp_charter.pdf.investor.ni.com/corporate-governance.
Under the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of our Executive Officers, recommends the compensation of NI’s Chief Executive Officerour CEO to the independent members of the Board for approval, evaluates the performance of NI’s executive officers, and establishes the salaries, equity awards, and cash bonus compensation of the executive officers. When establishing the salaries and cash bonus compensation for the executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer.Officers. The Compensation Committee also periodically examines NI’sour compensation structure to evaluate whether NI iswe are rewarding its officersour Executive Officers and other personnel in a manner consistent with sound industry practices and makes recommendations on such matters to NI’s management and Board of Directors.our Board. The Compensation Committee also has oversight responsibility for NI’sour 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2022 Incentive Plan”), 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Incentive Plan”), 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Incentive Plan”), NI’s 2010 Incentive Plan (the “2010 Incentive Plan”), NI’s2005 Incentive Plan (the “2005 Incentive Plan”), and 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and, if the National Instruments Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Incentive Plan”) is approved at the Annual Meeting, the 2020 Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors may by resolution prescribe additional authority and duties to the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee obtains input from NI’s Chief Executive Officer when discussing the performance of, and compensation levels for, executives other than himself. The Compensation Committee also works closely with the Chief Executive Officer, the Vice President of Global Human Resources and others as required in evaluating the financial, accounting, tax and retention implications of NI’s various compensation programs. The Vice President of
1614

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Global Human Resources regularly attendsThe Compensation Committee has engaged Compensia, an independent national consulting firm, to provide guidance to the meetings ofcommittee on compensation matters. When establishing the salaries, equity awards, and cash bonus compensation for the Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee also considers the recommendations of our President and at such meetings, provides advice on compensation matters to the Compensation Committee. TheCEO, other than for himself. Our Senior Vice President of Global Human Resourcesand Chief People Officer also provides guidance to the Compensation Committee concerning compensation matters as they relate to NI’s executive officers. Neitherall Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee works closely with management, as required, in evaluating the Chief Executive Officer, thefinancial, accounting, tax, and retention implications of our various compensation programs. Our Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer regularly attends the meetings of Global Human Resources,the Compensation Committee and provides advice on compensation matters to the Compensation Committee. Neither our President and CEO nor any of NI’sthe other executives participatesExecutive Officers participate in deliberations relating to his or her own compensation. Our Compensation Committee recommends to our Board who approves the compensation of our President and CEO.
The Compensation Committee’s charter contains provisions providing for the delegation of its duties to the Committee Chaircommittee chair or any subcommittees when appropriate. The Compensation Committee’s charter also permits the delegation of authority to executive officersone or more Executive Officers to make equity grants to employees or consultants who are not directors or executive officers. The Compensation Committee did not delegate any of its authority in 2019.Executive Officers.
For a discussion of NI’sthe Compensation Committee’s utilization of compensation consultants, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
1715

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The members of the Compensation Committee are set forth in the “Corporate Governance—Governance — Compensation Committee” section of this Proxy Statement and do not include any NI executive officers.current or former Executive Officers. During 2019,2022, no NI executive officerExecutive Officer served on the compensation committee (or equivalent), or the board of directors, of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on NI’sour Compensation Committee. During 2019,2022, no NI executive officerExecutive Officer served on the compensation committee (or equivalent) of another entity whose executive officer(s) served as a member of the NI Board of Directors.our Board.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with Related Persons
NI had no related party transactions requiring disclosure under applicable SEC rules for the year ended December 31, 20192022 and has no such related party transaction currently proposed.
Policy and Procedures for Review, Approval, or Ratification of Related Party Transactions
Pursuant to its written charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing NI’sour policies relating to the avoidance of conflicts of interests and past or proposed transactions between NI, members of theour Board, of Directors of NI, and management. NI considersWe consider “related person transactions” to mean all transactions involving a “related person,” which under SEC rules means an executive officer,Executive Officer, director or a holder of more than five percent of NI’sour common stock, including any of their immediate family members and any entity owned or controlled by such persons. The Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may approve, ratify, rescind or take other action with respect to the transaction in its discretion.
In any transaction involving a related person, NI’sour Audit Committee would consider the available material facts and circumstances of the transaction, including: the direct and indirect interests of the related person; the risks, costs and benefits of the transaction to NI; whether any alternative transactions or sources for comparable services or products are available; and, in the event the related person is a director (or immediate family member of a director or an entity with which a director is affiliated), the impact that the transaction will have on such director’s independence.
After considering such facts and circumstances, NI’sour Audit Committee determines whether approval, ratification or rescission of the related person transaction is in NI’sour best interests. NI’sOur Audit Committee believes that all employees and directors should be free from conflicting interests and influences of such nature and importance as would make it difficult to meet their applicable fiduciary duties and loyalty to NI and reviews all related party transactions against the foregoing standard.
NI’sOur written policies and procedures for review, approval or ratification of transactions that pose a conflict of interest, including related person transactions, are set forth in itsour Code of Ethics, which contains, among other policies, a conflicts of interest policy for all employees, including NI’s executives,our Executive Officers, and a conflicts of interest policy for non-employee directors.
Under NI’sour written conflicts of interest policy applicable to all employees, including NI’s executives, every employee isour Executive Officers, our employees are required to reportdisclose to NI’s CEOour legal department any information regarding the existencerelationship, association, activity, or likely developmentother circumstance or situation that could create a conflict of conflictsinterest. In addition, employees, including our Executive Officers, are required to disclose to our legal department enumerated facts related to certain (1) financial interests held in entities that do business with or compete against NI; (2) outside services provided to persons or entities that do business with or compete against NI; (3) participation in a decision on behalf of interest involving themselvesNI that relates to business with a family member or others withinclose personal relation; and (4) loans offered by or accepted from persons or entities that do business with or compete against NI. While NI provideswe provide examples of potential conflicts of interest, such as investments in enterprises that do business with NI, compensation for services to any person or firm which does business with NI, or gifts and loans and entertainment from any person or firm having current or prospective dealings with NI, the policy applicable to employees expressly states that the examples provided are illustrative only and that each employee should report any other circumstance which could be construed to interfere actually or potentially with loyalty to NI. Transactions involving potentialPotential conflicts of interests disclosed pursuant to the conflicts of interest policy for employees are reviewed first by NI’s CEO, who makesthe legal department and then resolved with the assistance of legal counsel, as appropriate. Resolutions of these disclosures by our Executive Officers require the approval of the Audit Committee, except that our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Legal Officer can (x) approve a determination as“no conflict” resolution when the situation is not mandatory to whether there exists any conflict of interest or relationship which violates NI’s policiesdisclose and the appropriate actions to take with respect to such relationship. NI’s General Counsel(y) reject a disclosure. Our Chief Legal Officer reports to the Audit Committee the conflict of interest reports receivedany disclosures by our Executive Officers that are resolved by our President and acted upon by the CEO. In the event a report was received concerning a potential conflict of the CEO or a member of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee would review such matter.Chief Executive Officer and Chief Legal Officer.
1816

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The written conflicts of interest policy applicable to all non-employee directors is substantially similar to the conflicts of interest policy applicable to NI employees, with the exceptionprovides that every non-employee director is required to report potential conflict of interest situations to the Audit Committee, which is responsible for makinglegal department. The legal department will recommend a resolution. Resolutions require the determination as to whether there exists any conflictapproval of interest or relationship which violates such policy. If the Audit Committee determines(except in the case of situations that a conflictare not mandatory to disclose for which the legal department found no conflict). The policy does not require reporting of interest exists,financial interests in an entity that does business with or competes against NI if the entity is publicly traded, and the non-employee director involved will be required to disposeowns less than 5% of the conflicting interest to the satisfactionsecurities of the Audit Committee.entity and is not an executive officer or member of the board of directors of such entity. It also does not require reporting of compensation for services to an entity that does significant business with or competes against NI if the compensation (a) relates only to services rendered by the non-employee director in his or her capacity as an employee, consultant, director, or trustee; (b) totaled less than $100,000 for the preceding year; and (c) is anticipated to total less than $100,000 for the current year.
1917

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD COMPENSATION
Determining Compensation for Non-Employee Directors in 20192022
The Board, of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nomination and& Governance Committee, sets non-employee director compensation with the goal of retaining NI’s directorsmembers of our Board and attracting qualified persons to serve as directors.members of our Board. In developing its recommendations, the Nomination and& Governance Committee consults with Compensia, an independent national compensation consulting firm engaged by our Nomination & Governance Committee, to advise on compensation matters. The Nomination & Governance Committee considers director compensation at comparable publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies and aims to structure director compensation in a manner that is transparent and easy for stockholders to understand.
The compensation of non-employee directorsmembers of the Board for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022 is set forth in the table below.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192022
Name
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
Stock
Awards
(1)
Total
Name
Fees
Earned or
Paid In
Cash
Stock
Awards
(1)
Total
Alexander M. Davern (2)
$
$
$
James E. Cashman, III
$109,821
$199,516
$309,337
Jeffrey L. Kodosky (3)
Alexander M. Davern
70,000
199,516
269,516
Charles J. Roesslein
91,574
175,037
266,611
Gayla J. Delly
117,500
199,516
317,016
Duy-Loan T. Le
88,709
175,037
263,746
Gerhard P. Fettweis
87,500
199,516
287,016
John M. Berra (4)
34,308
34,308
Liam K. Griffin
77,715
199,516
277,231
Michael E. McGrath
184,074
175,037
359,111
Duy-Loan T. Le
95,000
199,516
294,516
Gerhard P. Fettweis
75,647
175,037
250,684
Michael E. McGrath
195,000
199,516
394,516
James E. Cashman, III
59,605
350,073
409,678
Liam K. Griffin
58,032
350,073
408,105
(1)

AmountsThe amounts included in the table for stock awards represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for 2019 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). These dollar amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for these stockof awards and may not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the directors. The grant date fair value of each award is expensed monthly based on the estimated vesting period of the corresponding grant.made during 2022, as computed in accordance with ASC 718. Grant date fair value is calculated using the closing price of the day immediately preceding the date of grant multiplied by the number of RSUs granted. On April 24, 2019,20, 2022, Mr. Roesslein,Cashman, Mr. Davern, Ms. Le, Mr. McGrath,Delly, Dr. Fettweis, Mr. Cashman,Griffin, Ms. Le, and Mr. GriffinMcGrath were each granted 3,6995,037 RSUs (the “2019“2022 Director Grants”). The grant date fair value of each RSU grant2022 Director Grant was based on the April 23, 201919, 2022 closing price of $47.32$39.61 per share, and all 2022 Director Grants vest on May 1, 2020,2023, which is the one-year anniversary of the vesting commencement date. In connection with their initial appointments to the Board, Mr. Cashman and Mr. Griffin were each granted an additional 3,699 RSUs on April 24, 2019, which vest over a three-year period with 1/3rd of the RSUs vesting on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date, which is May 1, 2019. Such grants had the same grant date fair value as the 2019 Director Grants. As of December 31, 2019,2022, Mr. Roesslein,Cashman, Mr. Davern, Dr. Fettweis, Mr. Griffin, Ms. Le, and Mr. McGrath, and Dr. Fettweis each had 7,3265,037 outstanding and unvested RSUs. As of December 31, 2019, Mr. Cashman and Mr. Griffin each2022, Ms. Delly had 7,3986,522 outstanding and unvested RSUs.
(2)
As an employee director in 2019, Mr. Davern did not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. His compensation as an NI Named Executive Officer in 2019 is included below in the “Summary Compensation Table”.
(3)
As an employee director, Mr. Kodosky did not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. Mr. Kodosky is a Business and Technology Fellow, but not a named executive officer, as such term is defined under Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K. Pursuant to SEC rules, the compensation that a director receives for services as a Business and Technology Fellow does not need to be reported in the table for Director Compensation.
(4)
Mr. Berra informed the Board in September 2018 that he would not stand for re-election as a director at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 14, 2019.
20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Discussion of Director Compensation
The 20192022 annual compensation for NI’sour non-employee directors was comprised of cash compensation in the form of an annual retainer, committee chair retainer, committee membership retainer, independent board chair retainer and equity compensation in the form of RSUs. Each of these components is described below. An NI employee director doesEmployee members of our Board do not receive any additional compensation for his service as a director. Thus, neithermember of the Board. Accordingly, Mr. Starkloff, Mr. Davern nor Mr. Kodosky receivedour President and CEO, did not receive any compensation for his service as a director.
In 2019, we adjustedon the equityBoard in 2022. Mr. Starkloff’s total compensation for our non-employee directors after consideration of data and advice provided by Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), an independent compensation consultant. Based on data provided by Compensia,is shown in the compensation for our non-employee directors was at the lower end of the range of the comparable companies. Accordingly, in April 2019, the vesting schedule for the $175,000 in annual RSUs (based upon the prior day’s closing stock price) to non-employee directors was modified to a one-year vesting period from a three-year vesting periodtable entitled “Summary Compensation Table” and the modification was effective forrelated tables in the April 2019 RSU awards. New non-employee directors joining the Board are eligible for the annual RSU award of $175,000 at the first Board meeting following the date in which the new director joins the Board. New non-employee directors joining the Board are also eligible for a one-time RSU grant of the number of shares valued at $175,000 (based upon the prior day’s closing stock price), which is awarded simultaneously on the date of the first annual RSU award received by the non-employee director. The one-time grants to new non-employee directors will vest in equal installments over a three-year period. In October, the Nomination and Governance Committee reviewed cash compensation data prepared by Compensia and determined that the current non-employee director cash compensation structure is appropriate.section entitled “Executive Compensation.”
Annual Board/Committee Retainer Fees
For 2019,2022, our non-employee directors received cash compensation for membership on the board of directorsBoard and committees, committee chair positions, and the independent boardBoard chair position. Specifically, during 2022 non-employee directors receivereceived an annual cash retainer of $60,000 per year,$70,000, plus annual retainers for committee memberships in the following amounts: $10,000 per year for membership on the Audit Committee, $7,500 per year for membership on the Compensation Committee, and $5,000 per year for membership on the Nomination and& Governance Committee. During 2022, non-employee directors who served on the Transaction Evaluation Committee each received a cash retainer of
18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

$10,000 applicable to service on the Transaction Evaluation Committee. The Transaction Evaluation Committee of the Board was formed in 2022 with the purpose of supporting and furthering the Board and the Company’s review and evaluation of strategic transactions. In addition, the chairpersons of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nomination and& Governance Committee receive anreceived additional $25,000,annual retainers of $30,000, $20,000 and $15,000 per year,annual fee, respectively. The independent Board Chairchair receives an additional $100,000 per year for his service. All cash compensation is paid in quarterly installments.
The Board, in its discretion, may pay an overnight meeting fee or special meeting fee for extended meetings, not to exceed $2,000 per day. An NI employee director doesEmployee members of our Board do not receive any additional compensation for service as a director.member of our Board.
Non-Employee Director Reimbursement Practice
Non-employee directorsmembers of our Board are reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses connected to Board service.service as a member of our Board.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
Under NI’s applicable equity incentive plan, non-employee directorsNon-employee members of our Board are eligible to receive RSU grants. Specifically, beginningsingle annual grants of RSUs under our equity incentive plans in 2019,amounts determined by the Nomination & Governance Committee. On April 20, 2022, each non-employee director receivesmember of our Board received an annual grant of RSUs equal to $175,000 divided by$199,516 (based on the 30-trading day average of the closing price of NI’sour common stock ending on the day immediately preceding the date of grant,grant) with a one-year vesting schedule, and new non-employee directors are eligible for a one-time grant of RSUs equal to $175,000 divided by the closing price of NI’s common stock on the day immediately preceding the date of grant, with a three-year vesting schedule in equal annual installments to be granted at the same time as the new non-employee director's first annual RSU grant. Under the 2015 Incentive Plan, in 2019,vesting. Mr. Roesslein,Cashman, Mr. Davern, Ms. Le, Mr. McGrath,Delly, Dr. Fettweis, Mr. Cashman,Griffin, Ms. Le, and Mr. GriffinMcGrath were each granted 3,699 RSUs.5,037 RSUs as part of the 2022 Director Grants under our 2020 Incentive Plan. The grant date fair value of each RSU grant2022 Director Grant was based on the April 23, 2019 closing price of $47.32our common stock on April 19, 2022 of $39.61 per share andshare. The 2022 Director Grants vest on May 1, 2020. In connection with their initial appointments to the Board, on April 24, 2019, Mr. Cashman and Mr. Griffin were each granted an additional 3,699 RSUs based on NI’s closing stock price of $47.32 per share on April 23, 2019. The RSUs granted to Mr. Cashman and Mr. Griffin vest over a three-year period with 1/3rd of the RSUs vesting on May 1 of each year. Such grants had the same grant date fair value as the 2019 Director Grants.2023.
2119

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information concerning the persons currently serving as executive officersExecutive Officers of NI, including information as to each executive officer’sExecutive Officer’s current age, position with NI, and business experience. Executive officersOfficers of NI serve at the discretion of the Board.
Name of Executive Officer
Age
Position
Eric H. Starkloff
4548
President and Chief Executive Officer
Karen M. RappDaniel A. Berenbaum
5253
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Thomas Benjamin
50
Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer and Head of Platform R&D
Scott A. Rust
5356
SeniorExecutive Vice President, Global Product Research & Development
Jason E. Green
47
Senior Vice President, Global Sales, Support, Services, and Operations
Carla Pineyro SublettRitu Favre
4754
SeniorExecutive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer& GM, Business Units
See “Proposal One: Election“Incumbent Directors Whose Terms of Directors”Office Continue After the Meeting” for additional information with respect to Mr. Starkloff.
Karen M. RappDaniel A. Berenbaum joined NI in May 2017January 2023 and has servedcurrently serves as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since that time.Treasurer. Prior to joining NI, Ms. RappMr. Berenbaum served as Vice President, Finance - Global Operations Controller at Micron Technology, Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor manufacturing company, from April 2021 to January 2023. Prior to joining Micron, Mr. Berenbaum served as the Chief Financial Officer at Everspin Technologies Inc., a publicly traded semiconductor company, from July 2020 to April 2021. Prior to joining Everspin, Mr. Berenbaum held various executive roles at GlobalFoundries, the world’s leading specialty semiconductor foundry, from May 2013 to June 2020. He served as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Asia/Pacific from May 2018 to June 2020, Chief of Staff, Office of the CEO from September 2017 to May 2018, Head, Global Capital Procurement from August 2016 to September 2017, and Senior Director, Finance from May 2013 to August 2016. Prior to GlobalFoundries, Mr. Berenbaum spent a decade at various institutional equity and trading firms on Wall Street in analyst and leadership roles, where he accumulated extensive investment experience across the semiconductor space. His earlier experience includes seven years in various technical and management roles at Applied Materials, as well as five years as a nuclear power trained surface line officer in the United States Navy. Mr. Berenbaum has a B.S. in History from the United States Naval Academy.
Thomas Benjamin joined NI in September 2021 and currently serves as Chief Technology Officer, Executive Vice President and Head of Platform R&D. Prior to joining NI, he served as the Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President of Corporate Development of NXP Semiconductors N.V. (“NXP”),technology at SAP Ariba, a Dutch global semiconductor manufacturer, after NXP acquired Freescale Semiconductor in December 2015.software company, from January 2018 to July 2021. Prior to NXP's acquisition, Ms. Rapp workedjoining SAP Ariba, he served as Chief Technology Officer at Freescale beginning in April 2010 and held several leadership positions at Freescale with increasing responsibility, includingGeneral Electric Aviation, a subsidiary of General Electric, from August 2016 to December 2017. Prior to joining General Electric Aviation, he served as Vice President – Technology and Chief Information Officer, Director of OperationsArchitecture at the Emirates Group from January 2014 to July 2016. Prior to Emirates Group, he served at various technology leadership roles at Visa, Walmart, and Finance, Global Sales and Marketing, Director of Finance, Supply Chain and Director of Finance, Continuous Development. Ms. RappOracle. He holds a bachelor’s degreeMaster of Science in FinanceIndustrial Engineering from Northern IllinoisUniversity of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s in Engineering from The College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, India, as well as executive certifications from Stanford University, Singularity University, and a master’s degree inHarvard Business Administration from the University of Texas at Austin. Ms. Rapp currently serves as a director of Plexus Corp., a publicly traded company.School Online.
Scott A. Rust joined NI in June 1990 and has servedcurrently serves as SeniorExecutive Vice President, Global Product Research and Development since January 2019.Operations. He previously served asheld various roles at NI, including Executive Vice President, Platform & Technology from January 2022 to December 2022, Executive Vice President, Platform & Product from October 2021 to January 2022, Senior Vice President, Global Research and& Development from JanuaryFebruary 2014 to January 2019; as NI’sOctober 2021, Vice President of Research and Development Test Systems from July 2013 to January 2014; as NI’s2014, Vice President of Research and Development in Penang, Malaysia from January 2011 to July 2013; as2013, Vice President of Research and Development of Modular Instruments from October 2008 to December 2010; as2010, Director of Modular Instruments from March 2003 to September 2008; as2008, Software Section Manager from October 2000 to March 2003; as2003, Group Manager from October 1996 to October 2000; as2000, Marketing Manager of Test and Measurement Software from August 1991 to September 1996;1996, and as Applications Engineer from June 1990 to July 1991. Mr. Rust received his bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Texas A&M University.
Jason E. GreenRitu Favre joined NI in September 2015July 2019 and hascurrently serves as Executive Vice President & GM, Business Units. She previously served as NI’s Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Semiconductor and Electronics, Aerospace, Defense, and Government, and Transportation Business Units from January 2021 to January 2022; and Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Semiconductor Business Unit from July 2019 to January 2021. Prior to joining NI, Ms. Favre worked as Chief Executive Officer at NEXT Biometrics from February 2017 to July 2019. From May 2014 to October 2016, Ms. Favre served as Senior Vice President Global Sales, Support, Services, and Operations since January 2019. He previously served as Senior Vice President, Global Sales from May 2018 to December 2018 and as Vice President, Regional Sales, Americas from September 2015 to April 2018. Prior to joining NI, Mr. Green worked at Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. from 1995 to 2015 where he served as Vice President of Americas sales and applications and was responsible for manyGM of the company’s largest global customers. Mr. Green holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration with a minor in Economics from the University of Florida.
Carla Pineyro Sublett joined NI in February 2019 and has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer since that time. Prior to joining NI, Ms. Pineyro Sublett worked at Rackspace Hosting, Inc. from May 2015 to October 2017 as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, and was responsible for all facets of global marketing. Ms. Pineyro Sublett also held several positions with increasing responsibility at Dell Technologies Inc. from August 1999 to May 2015, including Regional Sales Director, Software and Peripherals; Executive Chief of Staff, Large Enterprise Americas; Executive Director, Inside Sales, Large Enterprise Americas; and Divisional Chief Marketing Officer, Latin America. Ms. Pineyro Sublett attended the University of Texas where she studied Latin American Studies and Architecture.Biometrics Products
2220

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Division at Synaptics, Inc. and served in various roles at Motorola and Freescale Semiconductor from June 1988 to May 2014, including Senior Vice President and General Manager for RF from September 2012 to May 2014. Ms. Favre has served on the board of directors of Valmont Industries since September 2020 and previously served on the board of directors of Cohu, Inc., from January 2019 to May 2019. Ms. Favre holds a BS in Electrical Engineering and a Masters in Electrical Engineering from Arizona State University.
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information regarding the 20192022 compensation program for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and the three executive officersExecutive Officers (other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) at fiscal year-endthe end of 2022, who were our most highly-compensated executive officers (ourhighly compensated Executive Officers (collectively, our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”). The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the compensation tables contained elsewhere inof this Proxy Statement. For 2019,2022, our Named Executive Officers were:
Alexander M. Davern, our Chief Executive Officer;were, with their current titles, as applicable:
Eric H. Starkloff, our President and Chief Operating Officer;Executive Officer (our “President and CEO”);
Karen M. Rapp, our now former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (resignation effective January 9, 2023);
Jason E. Green, our now former Chief Revenue Officer and Treasurer;Executive Vice President (departure effective December 31, 2022);
Scott A. Rust, our SeniorExecutive Vice President, Global Product Research and Development;Operations; and
John C. Roiko,Ritu Favre, our Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Accounting Officer.
Chief Executive Officer Change Announced During 2019
On October 29, 2019, we announced that Mr. Starkloff, who was serving as our President and Chief Operating Officer, was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer, effective February 1, 2020, and that he would continue to serve as our President. We also announced that Mr. Davern, who was serving as our Chief Executive Officer, would remain as our Chief Executive Officer until January 31, 2020, and then transition into a strategic advisory role to provide certain transition and advisory services until our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mr. Davern will continue to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.& GM, Business Units.
Executive Summary
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describesoutlines the material elements of our 2022 executive compensation program during 2019. It alsoprograms, provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, including our principal compensation policies and practices. Finally, it analyzes howpractices, and why the Compensation Committee arrived at thedescribes specific compensation decisions made during 2022 by our Compensation Committee for our Named Executive Officers, in 2019 and discussesincluding the key factors that the Compensation Committee considered in determining theirour Named Executive Officers’ compensation.
Who We AreChief Financial Officer Transition Announced in December 2022
NI was formed over 40 years ago onMs. Rapp resigned as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2023 and transitioned to a strategic advisor role to ensure an idea of connecting engineers through software. Our founders created technology to connect instruments to computersorderly transition. In connection with Ms. Rapp’s resignation, we entered into an Offer Letter for Continuing Employment with Ms. Rapp dated December 12, 2022 (the “Rapp Offer Letter”), which superseded and replaced Ms. Rapp’s existing Executive Employment Agreement with the Company. Ms. Rapp did not receive any severance payments or benefits in order to accelerate the testing and measurement of innovative technology, and this was the seed of a philosophy of accelerating innovation that continues to be a driving force of our culture, our business, and our operations today. We strive to enable customers around the world to do their most ambitious work while meeting fast-moving market demands. We provide the integration of modular hardware and open, flexible software systems, to consistently support organizations’ evolving test and measurement needs. Our hope is that in 100 years’ time, future generations will continue to benefit from the results of the innovation we make possible today.
Our overarching goal, which we call our core strategic vision, is to be the leader in software-defined automated test and automated measurement systems. In pursuing our vision, we have empowered our team to be deliberateconnection with her resignation. Information about the market opportunities we pursue to fuel growth by targeting the applications where we believe our systems can provide significant value to our customers. We believe our long-term track record for innovation and our differentiationRapp Offer Letter is described below in the market helps supportsection entitled “Employment Arrangements and Post-Employment Compensation.”
Daniel Berenbaum commenced serving as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer in January 2023, pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement with the success ofCompany dated December 14, 2022 (the “Berenbaum Executive Employment Agreement”).
2022 Business Highlights
We experienced strong demand for our customers, employees, community,products throughout 2022 and stockholders.continued to focus on driving efficiencies across our business. Despite some disruptions from global supply chain constraints, we were able to achieve record revenue and the highest non-GAAP operating income in more than 20 years.
Revenue: We reported net sales of $1.7 billion, an all-time record and a 13% percent increase from 2021.
Cash Generation: We generated annual cash flow from operations of $43 million. As of December 31, 2022, we held $140 million in cash and cash equivalents.
Capital Deployment: In 2022, we returned $300 million to our stockholders through dividends and stock repurchases. We also completed the acquisition of several companies for total consideration of $72 million, net of cash received. These acquisitions are intended to accelerate our investments in key focus areas, including vehicle electrification.
22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Product Portfolio: We continued to sharpen our focus on system-level automated test and automated measurement offerings in key growth areas, including semiconductor, transportation, and aerospace, defense, and government.
graphic
Say-on-Pay Vote
At our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 91% of the votes present and Introduction of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards
We viewentitled to vote on the stockholder advisory vote onfor Named Executive Officer compensation (also known as the “Say-on-Pay” vote) voted in favor of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. We view the Say-on-Pay vote as an opportunity to receive feedback from our stockholders about our executive compensation program. PriorAs set forth in more detail in the Introduction to our annual meetingsthis Proxy Statement, in the fourth quarter of stockholders,2021 and 2022, we reachreached out to our major stockholders and engageengaged with them on their views and concerns about our policies and practices, including our executive compensation. PriorOverall, the feedback we have received from our stockholders supported our existing executive compensation program.
During 2022, the Compensation Committee made no material changes to the structure of the total direct compensation paid to our 2018Named Executive Officers. See the Introduction to this Proxy Statement for additional information about our stockholder engagement efforts.
2022 Executive Compensation Highlights
In 2022, the Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers:
Established Named Executive Officer Base Salaries – Approved annual base salary increases for three of our Named Executive Officers ranging from 3.5% to 5.9%. The base salary for two of our Named Executive Officers, including our President and CEO, remained unchanged for 2022.
Established Named Executive Officer Executive Incentive Program (“EIP”) Targets – For our Named Executive Officers, other than our President and CEO, approved the key company financial and operational performance objectives, pre-established performance levels for each objective, and related payout levels (expressed as a percentage that increased or decreased with company performance) for cash incentive bonus opportunities pursuant to the EIP, and approved target cash incentive bonus opportunities of 100% of our Named Executive Officer’s 2022 annual base salary. Our Board, based on the recommendations of the Compensation Committee, approved the same EIP key company financial and operational performance objectives for our President and CEO. Our Board approved, at the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, a target cash incentive bonus opportunity equal to 135% of our President and CEO’s 2022 annual base salary, which, if paid at target, would result in an EIP payout of $992,250. For 2022, the EIP Bonus paid to Mr. Starkloff, Ms. Rapp, Mr. Rust and Ms. Favre was $385,191, $194,100, $164,985 and $174,690, respectively. See “Executive Incentive Program” below for more information regarding the EIP, including actual payouts for 2022.
Granted Named Executive Officer Equity Awards – Granted equity awards in the form of 40% time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and 60% performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to be settled in shares of our common stock, in amounts ranging from target levels of $1,100,000 to $1,700,000, to our Named Executive Officers, other than our President and CEO, and a target level of $6,000,000 (40% RSUs and 60% PRSUs) to our President and CEO.
23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we engaged with several of our stockholders and specifically requested feedback on our executive compensation program. The executive compensation feedback received was focused on three areas: (i) our CEO pay relative to total shareholder return, (ii) that our long-term incentive (“LTI”) program for our Named Executive Officers was limited to time-based-restricted stock units (referred to herein as “RSUs”) and did not include performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), and (iii) a lack of transparency about our Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”) bonus goals.
In response to this stockholder feedback, the Compensation Committee determined that we should add performance-based equity awards to our LTI compensation program. In 2019, PRSUs represented 50% of the equity award value awarded to our Named Executive Officers, while the other 50% consisted of RSUs. We have subsequently received favorable stockholder feedback with respect to implementing PRSUs with relative metrics such as total shareholder return (“TSR”). We believe that our use of performance-based LTI compensation is important to strengthening the alignment between our executive officers’ compensation and creation of stockholder value, while also driving the achievement of NI’s financial and operational goals.
At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 97% of the votes present and entitled to vote on the Say-on-Pay proposal were voted in favor of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. See “Corporate Governance—Our Stockholder Engagement Program” for additional information about our stockholder engagement.
2019 Business Highlights
During 2019, we achieved record net income, which increased over the past three years, as illustrated in the chart below. We also achieved several other important financial and operational results which are described in more detail in this section. We believe these achievements reflect the value that our platform-based approach provides to our customers and our execution on our commitment to financial and operational excellence.

In 2019, we achieved the following important financial and operational results:
Revenue: We reported net sales of $1.35 billion, relatively flat compared to 2018 despite headwinds from the overall weakness in the industrial economy during most of the year.
Financial Discipline: We reported record operating income of $175 million in 2019, up 46% over three years. We also reported record net income of $162 million, up 96% over three years.
Cash Generation: We generated annual cash flow from operations of $224 million. As of December 31, 2019, we held $433 million in cash and short-term investments.
Capital Deployment: In 2019, we returned over $300 million to our stockholders through dividends and share repurchases. Our strategies for capital deployment remain the same: payment of our quarterly dividend, opportunistic stock repurchases, and acquisitions of strategic accelerators.
24
Former CFO Transition – We entered into the Rapp Offer Letter with Ms. Rapp, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, which sets forth the following compensation terms for her role as a strategic advisor, effective January 9, 2023:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Product Portfolio: We continued to sharpen our focus on system-level automated test and automated measurement offerings in key growth areas, including semiconductor, transportation, and aerospace, defense, and government.
2019 Executive Compensation Highlights
As noted in the “Executive Summary”, the CEO position transitioned from Mr. Davern to Mr. Starkloff on February 1, 2020. The 2019 CEO compensation discussion below refers to Mr. Davern's compensation. We also discuss Mr. Starkloff's 2020 CEO compensation, where relevant, as the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement (defined below) that establishes Mr. Starkloff's compensation was entered into in October 2019 and became effective on February 1, 2020.
In 2019, the Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers:
Base Salary — Approved annual base salary increases ranging from 3.9% to 26.0%, including a base salary increase of 7.0% for our CEO. The 26% base salary increase from 2018 for Mr. Starkloff is predominately due to Mr. Starkloff’s appointment as our President and Chief Operating Officer on October 25, 2018.
Annual Cash Incentive Bonus Programs:
Approved target incentive bonus opportunities for our Named Executive Officers under our Annual Incentive Program (“AIP”) ranging from 30% to 100% of their 2019 annual base salary, for payout amounts ranging from $32,625 to $213,332. This resulted in the payment of an annual cash bonus for our CEO in the amount of $213,332, equal to 28% of his target annual cash bonus opportunity.
Determined no cash bonus payments were to be made pursuant to our Annual Company Performance Bonus Program (“CPB”).
Established an Executive Incentive Program (“EIP”) for executive officers. In January 2020, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the independent members of the Board approved the implementation of the EIP, which combined the AIP and the CPB into one bonus program for our executive officers. While the EIP bonus targets will replace the combined bonus targets of the AIP and the CPB for our executive officers, the core financial objectives of revenue growth and operating income will remain. The EIP will also maintain the AIP objective related to employee retention. Under the EIP, the Compensation Committee, or the independent members of the Board with respect to the CEO, will not have discretion to modify the attainment of an executive officer goal.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation — Based on feedback from our stockholders, granted LTI compensation opportunities in the form of 50% RSU awards and 50% PRSU awards that will be settled for whole shares of our common stock (with any fraction of a share to be settled in cash), in amounts ranging from target levels of approximately $177,288 for our Named Executive Officers (other than our CEO) to approximately $5,340,969 for our CEO, for the RSUs and PRSUs, at grant date fair value. See below in Note 1 in “Elements of Executive Compensation—Long Term Incentive Compensation” for discussion of value for PRSUs using a Monte Carlo simulation.
Promotion of Mr. Starkloff — Established the following compensation arrangements for Mr. Starkloff in connection with his appointment as our Chief Executive Officer, effective February 1, 2020:
an annual base salary of $700,000;$300,000;
a target incentive bonus opportunity under our EIP for 2020 equal to 135% of his annual base salary1;
a one-time promotional RSU award for 75,000 sharestarget cash incentive bonus opportunity under our Annual Incentive Program (the “AIP”) of NI common stock, scheduled40% of her annual base salary assuming continued employment through the applicable AIP payout date; and
unvested RSUs and PRSUs that were outstanding as of January 9, 2023 will continue to vest based on her continued employment in equal installments annually over a three-year period that commenced February 1, 2020,strategic advisor role pursuant to the Rapp Offer Letter through the applicable vesting dates, subject to his continued service on each such vesting date;
1
The executive employment agreement executed by Mr. Starkloff on October 28, 2019 entitled Mr. Starkloff to participate in the AIP and the CPB with an AIP target of 110% of his base salary and an CPB target of 25% of his base salary, respectively. On February 3, 2020, the executive employment agreement was amended (as amended, the "Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement"), to reflect the implementation of the EIP. Pursuant to the amendment, in lieu of Mr. Starkloff’s participation in the AIP and CPB, Mr. Starkloff will have an annual EIP target of 135% of his base salary.
25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a one-time promotional PRSU award for 75,000 shares (at target)the terms of NI common stock based on NI’s total shareholder return performance in relation to the performance of the Russell 2000 index (“Index”) over a three-year performance period that commenced January 1, 2020, subject to his continued service on the vesting date of December 31, 2022;
a restricted stock unit award equal to the result (rounded to the nearest whole share) of $2,000,000 divided by the closing price of NI’s common stock on the day immediately preceding the grant date at the nextour equity award approval cycle (expected in April 2020), of which half will be RSUs, scheduled to vest in equal installments annually over a three-year period and with the remainder to be PRSUs to be earned over a three-year performance period that commenced January 1, 2020, based on NI's total shareholder return performance in relation to the performance of the index over the same three-year performance period, commencing January 1, 2020, subject to his continued service on the vesting date of December 31, 2022; and
Mr. Starkloff's post-employment compensation arrangements were revised in connection with his appointment as CEO (for further discussion please see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below).
In establishing these compensation arrangements, the Compensation Committee took into consideration Mr. Starkloff’s experience and skillsincentive plan(s) as well as the competitive market for similar positions at other comparable companiesapplicable RSU and PRSU award agreements.
Ms. Rapp has informed us of her intent to continue in her strategic advisor role only through May 2023 and, based on a review of the compensation survey data from our independent compensation consultant, Compensia.
CEO Transition — Established the following compensation arrangements for Mr. Davern in connection with his transition from our Chief Executive Officer to a strategic advisory role, effective January 31, 2020 and until May 5, 2020. During this transition period, Mr. Davern will receive his current base salary and benefits; however, Mr. Davern willproposed resignation date, Ms. Rapp would not be eligible for any bonus or other incentive payto participate in 2020. Nor will Mr. Davern be eligible to receive any additional consulting fees outside of his continued base salarythe AIP which is typically paid out after year end. More information about the Rapp Offer Letter is described below in the section entitled “Employment Arrangements and benefits. If Mr. Davern signs a separation agreement, his RSUs that are subject to service-based vesting, and scheduled to vest prior to May 5, 2021, will vest upon signing. Mr. Davern's unvested PRSUs will terminate upon his separation.Post-Employment Compensation.”
2020 Equity Incentive Plan — Subject to stockholder approval of Proposal Two, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the 2020 Incentive Plan to replace the expiring 2015 Incentive Plan.
Pay-for-Performance Discussion
Our 20192022 executive compensation program which consisted of base salary, an annual cash incentive bonus opportunity under our AIP, an annual cash bonus opportunity under our CPB, LTIEIP, and long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of RSUs and PRSUs,PRSUs. The EIP metrics and other benefits, waspayouts are closely linked to stockholder value creation through the achievement of our short-term and long-term financial, operational, and strategic objectives.objectives, and PRSUs are earned and eligible for vesting based on our TSR compared to the TSR of the specified index over a three-year performance period.
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The 20192022 pay mix for our CEO and our other Named Executive Officers was predominantly variable or “at risk.” As the following charts illustrate, the intended target value of histhe variable or her equity awards, assuming the value per unit is equal to“at risk” compensation for 2022 was 91% of our stock price on the grant date, for 2019, 88% of ourPresident and CEO’s target total direct compensation (defined as the sum of his 20192022 base salary, target annual cash incentive bonus opportunity under the AIP,and target annual cash bonus opportunity under the CPB, and the intended target value of his equity awards)award opportunities), and 74%80% of our other Named Executive Officers’ average target total direct compensation.
graphic
Further, 60% of our President and CEO’s target total direct compensation was tied to the achievement of pre-established, rigorous financial goals through the EIP bonus and PRSUs, as was 56% of the average target total direct compensation of our other Named Executive Officers, was delivered in the formOfficers. We believe this distribution of variable or “at risk” compensation.compensation, which depends on our performance, aligns our Named Executive Officer’s interests with those of our stockholders.

Further, LTIIn addition, long-term incentive compensation in the form of either RSUs or PRSUs represented 73%78% of our President and CEO’s target total direct compensation and 55%60% of the average target total direct compensation of our other Named Executive Officers.
Based on feedback we received from our stockholders in prior years and through our own due diligence and a competitive positioning analysis of compensation provided by our peers, in 2022, PRSU awards represent 60% of the target
24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

equity award opportunity awarded to our Named Executive Officers, while the other 40% consisted of RSU awards. We have received favorable stockholder feedback with respect to granting PRSUs with relative performance metrics such as total shareholder return (“TSR”). We believe that our use of performance-based long term incentive compensation is important to strengthening the alignment between our Named Executive Officers’ compensation and creation of stockholder value, while also driving the achievement of our financial and operational goals.
Executive Compensation Policies and Practices
We endeavor to maintain sound governance standards consistent with our executive compensation policies and practices. The Compensation Committee evaluates our executive compensation program on a regular basis to ensure that it is consistent with our short-term and long-term goals of driving revenue and profitable growth for the Company, given the dynamic nature of our business and the market in which we compete for executive talent. The following summarizes our executive compensation and related policies and practices:
What We Do
Maintain an Independent Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee consists solely of independent directors who establish our compensation practices.
Retain an Independent Compensation Advisor. The Compensation Committee has engaged its own compensation consultant to provide information, analysis, and other advice on executive compensation independent of management.
Annual Executive Officer Compensation Review. At least once a year, the Compensation Committee conducts a review of our Executive Officer compensation strategy.
Pay for Performance. Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of our Named Executive Officers’ target total direct compensation is variable or “at risk” based on achievement of pre-established corporate performance objectives.
Annual Compensation-Related Risk Assessment. We consider our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation-related risks do not create inappropriate or excessive risk and are not likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
Stock Ownership Policy. We have adopted stock ownership guidelines for our Executive Officers and the non-employee members of our Board under which they must accumulate and hold, consistent with the terms of the guidelines, a number of shares of common stock equivalent to a multiple of their annual base salary or retainer, as applicable.
“Double-Trigger” Compensation Arrangements in Connection with a Change in Control for Our Named Executive Officers. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in their respective employment agreements) of the Company, our Named Executive Officers would not receive severance payments or benefits pursuant to their employment agreement unless there is both (i) a Change in Control of the Company and (ii) an involuntary termination of employment without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (also as defined in their respective employment agreements) within the period beginning three months prior to a Change in Control and ending 12 months following a Change in Control. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for more information on our Named Executive Officer’s Change in Control payments and benefits.
“Clawback” Policy. We have adopted a “clawback” policy (the “Clawback Policy”) applicable to any current and former Executive Officers, which enables the Compensation Committee to recoup excess incentive compensation awarded after January 1, 2022 in the event of a restatement of our financial statements caused by an Executive Officer’s fraud, intentional misconduct, or gross negligence. See “Other Compensation Policies – Compensation Clawback Policy” below for further information on the Clawback Policy.
Maintain an Independent Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee consists solely of independent directors who establish our compensation practices.
Retain an Independent Compensation Advisor. The Compensation Committee has engaged its own compensation consultant to provide information, analysis and other advice on executive compensation independent of management.
Annual Executive Compensation Review. At least once a year, the Compensation Committee conducts a review of our executive compensation strategy.
Compensation At-Risk. Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of our executive officer’s compensation is “at risk” based on corporate performance, because it is equity-based, to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers and stockholders.
Annual Compensation-Related Risk Assessment.What We consider our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation-related risks do not create inappropriate or excessive risk and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on NI.Do Not Do
Stock Ownership Policy. We have adopted stock ownership guidelines for our Named Executive Officers and the non-employee members of our Board of Directors under which they must accumulate and hold, consistent with the terms of the guidelines, a specific amount of shares of NI common stock.
“Double Trigger” Compensation Arrangements in Connection with a Change in Control. In the event of a change in control, our CEO has a “double trigger” compensation arrangement with respect to his base salary and bonus.
No Guaranteed Bonuses. We do not provide guaranteed bonuses to our Named Executive Officers.
2725

TABLE OF CONTENTS

What We Do Not Do
No Guaranteed Bonuses. We do not provide guaranteed bonuses to our Named Executive Officers.
No Special Retirement Plans.
No Special Retirement Plans. We do not currently offer, nor do we have plans to offer, defined benefit pension plans or any non-qualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements to our Named Executive Officers other than the plans and arrangements that are available to all employees. Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our Section 401(k) retirement savings plan on the same basis as our other employees.
No Short Selling, Hedging or Derivatives Transactions. We have a policy which prohibits our executive officers from short selling or trading in derivatives of our securities, holding our securities in margin accounts, or engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities.
No Excise Tax Payments on Future Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements. We do not provide any excise tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on payments or benefits contingent upon certain terminations or a change in control of NI.
No Special Welfare or Health Benefits. We do not provide our Named Executive Officers with any welfare or health benefit programs, other than participation in our broad-based employee programs and an annual physical.
No Special Perquisites. We do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers.
No Short Selling, Hedging or Derivatives Transactions. We prohibit short selling or trading in derivatives of our securities. In addition, directors, executive officers and other employees identified by us as those subject to our quarterly blackout window are prohibited from holding our securities in margin accounts, pledging our securities as collateral for any loan or engaging in hedging or similar transactions with respect to our securities.
No Excise Tax Payments on Future Post-Employment Compensation Arrangements. We do not provide any excise tax reimbursement payments (including “gross-ups”) on payments or benefits contingent upon certain terminations of employment or a Change in Control of the Company.
No Special Welfare or Health Benefits. We do not provide our Named Executive Officers with any welfare or health benefit programs, other than an annual executive physical.
Limited Perquisites. We do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation philosophy is based on the concept of pay“pay for performanceperformance” and is aligned towith the following primary goals:
Our compensation practices are designed to support the interests of our stockholders.
Achieving financial goals and other operational targets arethat drive the profitable growth of the Company is the basis for measuring performance.
Sufficient upside, in the form of the potential to earn more than the target amount, and downside, in the form of risk of not earning the full target amount, isincluding zero, are built ininto our incentive compensation plans to deliver appropriate rewards based on Company results.
Based on this philosophy, our executive compensation program is guided by the following overarching principles:
Business Driven:
Business Driven: Compensation should be aligned to our performance by linking rewards directly to the achievement of specific and challenging financial, operational, and strategic objectives that are expected to lead to increased stockholder value and executive retention and engagement.
Performance Differentiated: Compensation should be structured to create an effective link between pay and performance at both the corporate and individual level so that the contributions of our executives are valued and rewarded.
Market Competitive: Compensation should be competitive to attract, retain, and motivate the senior leadership needed to achieve our core strategic vision.
Our overall amount of equity awards should be related to our revenue growth: We believe that our use of equity awards must be sensitive to the dilutive impact that such equity compensation will have on our stockholders. As a result, the overall amount of equity awards for 2019 was linked to our revenue growth.
Performance Differentiated: Compensation should be structured to create an effective link between pay and performance at both the corporate and individual level so that the contributions of our Executive Officers are valued and rewarded.
Market Competitive: Compensation should be competitive to attract, retain, and motivate Executive Officers needed to achieve our core strategic vision.
No Excessive Dilution: We believe that our overall reliance on equity awards should be related to our performance, and that the use of equity awards must be sensitive to the dilutive impact that such equity compensation will have on our stockholders.
We also maintain a strong focus on leadership development and retention, and as such, our executive compensation program is designed to ensure that we attract and retain the talent required to execute our business strategy. The compensation actions and decisions for our Named Executive Officers support our talent retention objectives by considering individual contributions to our performance, long-term potential and holding power, and organizational succession plans.
We regularly assess and adjust our executive compensation program, policies, and practices in light of these overarching principles and, in doing so, consider feedback obtained through our stockholder engagement efforts.
2826

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation-Setting Process
Role of Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, other than for our President and CEO. The independent members of our Board review and approve the recommendations of the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation for our President and CEO. The Compensation Committee’s decisions are subject to any approval of our Board of Directors that the Compensation Committee or legal counsel determines to be desirable or is required by applicable law or Nasdaq rules. Specifically, the Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation plans,program, administers our equity compensation plans, and reviews and approves the compensation of our executive officers. With respect to the compensation ofExecutive Officers (other than our CEO, the Compensation Committee recommends such compensation to the independent directors of the Board of Directors, who also separately approve it.President and CEO).
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our Board of Directors.Board. A copy of the charter is posted on the investor relations section of our website located at http:https://www.ni.com/pdf/nati/us/comp_charter.pdf.investor.ni.com/corporate-governance.
As described in greater detail in the next section, the Compensation Committee considers both NICompany performance and individual performance when determining the overall compensation levels for our Named Executive Officers, as well as the individual elements of compensation. For example, in determining increases in base salary and LTI compensation opportunities, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration, among other things, the prior individual performance of an executive officer, as well as NI’s performance. Similarly, NI’s previous and current cash incentive programs areour EIP is designed to incentincentivize our executive officersExecutive Officers to achieve our businesspre-established Company key objectives, set forth in our annual operating planwhich are financial and operational metrics, and ensure that NI’sour performance as a whole impacts the amounts payable to participants. The Compensation Committee believes that the various elements of executive compensation should work together to promote our objective that total compensation be related both to companyCompany and individual performance.
Setting Total Direct Compensation
The Compensation Committee (or, in the case of our President and CEO, the independent members of our Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) does not establish a specific target for the total direct compensation opportunity of our Named Executive Officers. In making decisions about the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee (or in the case of our President and CEO, the independent members of our Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee) relies primarily on the general business acumen and experience of its members and subjective consideration of various factors, including the following:
our executive compensation program objectives;
our performance against the financial, operational, and strategic objectives established by the Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors;Board;
each individual executive officer’sNamed Executive Officer’s knowledge, skills, experience, qualifications, and tenure relative to other similarly-situatedsimilarly situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group;group and/or selected broad-based compensation surveys;
the scope of each executive officer’sNamed Executive Officer’s role and responsibilities compared to other similarly-situatedsimilarly situated executives at the companies in our compensation peer group;group and/or selected broad-based compensation surveys;
the prior performance of each individual executive officer,Named Executive Officer, based on a subjective assessment of his or her contributions to our overall performance, ability to lead his or her business unit or function, and work as part of a team, all of which reflect our core values;
the potential of each individual executive officerNamed Executive Officer to contribute to our long-term financial, operational, and strategic objectives;
the business risk presented to us in the event the executive officerNamed Executive Officer were to leave our employ;
our President and CEO’s compensation relative to that of our executive officers,Named Executive Officers, and compensation parity among our executive officers;Named Executive Officers;
general compensation trends and practices in the technology industry;industry and broader U.S. market;
27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the compensation practices of comparable companies, including our compensation peer group and the positioning of each executive officer’sNamed Executive Officer’s compensation in a ranking of peer company compensation levels based on an analysis of competitive market data conducted by our independentthe Compensation Committee’s compensation advisorsconsultant as well as our in-house compensation experts; and
29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the recommendations of our President and CEO with respect to the compensation of our executive officersNamed Executive Officers (other than his own compensation).
These factors provide the framework for compensation decision-making and final decisions regarding the compensation opportunity for each executive officer.Named Executive Officer. No single factor is determinative in setting compensation levels, nor is the impact of any individualsingle factor on the determination of pay levels objectively quantifiable.
The Compensation Committee does not weigh these factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply any formulas in developing its compensation decisions. The members of the Compensation Committee consider all of this informationfactors in light of their individual experience, knowledge of NI,the Company, knowledge of the competitive market, knowledge of each executive officer,Named Executive Officer, and business judgment in making these decisions.
Role of Management
In establishing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee worksworked closely with our senior management, including our President and CEO and our Senior Vice President of Global Human Resources.and Chief People Officer. In 2019,2022, the Compensation Committee obtained input from our President and CEO when discussing the performance of, and compensation levels for, our executive officersNamed Executive Officers (other than himself). The Compensation Committee also worked closely with our President and CEO and our Senior Vice President of Global Human Resourcesand Chief People Officer and others, as required, in evaluating the financial, accounting, tax, talent management/succession planning, and retention implications of our executive compensation program and its various elements. Neither our President and CEO nor any of our other Named Executive Officers arewas present when theirhis or her own compensation iswas being discussed by the Compensation Committee.
Role of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has engaged Compensia, a national compensation consulting firm, as its independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters. In 2019,2022, at the direction of the Compensation Committee, Compensia conducted various projects, including performing a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program, performing a comprehensive review of the compensation program for our Board on behalf of Directors, conducting an analysis of chief executive officer compensation (which the CompensationNomination and Governance Committee, considered in connection with the promotion of Mr. Starkloff), assisting the Compensation Committee in updating our compensation peer group and preparing an analysis of the compensation of our Executive Officers, and assisting in the preparation of the executive compensation disclosure for our 20192022 proxy statement. Compensia did not provide any other services to NIfor us in 2019.2022.
The Compensation Committee has evaluated its relationshipannually reviews Compensia’s performance. As part of the review process, the Compensation Committee considers the independence of Compensia in accordance with Compensia to ensure that it believes that such firm is independent from management.SEC and Nasdaq listing rules. This review process included a review of the services that such compensation consultant provided, the quality of those services, and the fees associated with the services provided during 2019. 2022.
Based on this review, as well as consideration of the factors affecting independence set forth in the listing standards ofSEC and Nasdaq and the relevant SEClisting rules, the Compensation Committee has determined that no conflict of interest was raised by Compensia'sCompensia’s work and that Compensia met the independence requirements of such rules.
Competitive Positioning
In making its compensation decisions for 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed a competitive market analysis based on a compensation peer group, including (1) compensation data collected from publicly available information contained in the SEC filings from 19 selected peer group companies, and (2) data from a customized cut of the Radford Global Technology Survey, which included 15 of the 19 peer companies. Where insufficient data was available for a specific position for our peer group, the Compensation Committee looked at data from the general Radford Global Technology survey focusing on publicly traded technology companies with annual revenues ranging from $1 billion to $3 billion.
3028

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Competitive Positioning
In makingBased on the recommendation of its compensation decisions for 2019,consultant, the Compensation Committee reviewed a competitive market analysis based on industry specific compensation data drawn from various analyses of a Radford Global Technology Survey and from its compensation peer group. The survey data was based on executive compensation information from a custom survey analysis of our compensationmade the following changes to the peer group for 2022 (as compared to the peer group for 2021): (1) removed Nuance Communications due to its pending acquisition and Synopsys due to its large market capitalization, (2) added Advanced Energy Industries and FormFactor as well as executive compensation information from publicly-traded companies in the technology sector with annual revenues ranging from $1 billionthey fit our traditional business model, and (3) added Altair Engineering and Alteryx to $3 billion.reflect our transition to a software-oriented business model. The compensation peer group approved by the Compensation Committee for 2022 consisted of the following companies:
Company Name
Annual
Revenue
(in millions)
(last four quarters)
Market
Capitalization (1)
(in millions)
Advanced Energy Industries
$1,452
$3,846
Altair Engineering
489
4,902
Alteryx
505
5,314
ANSYS
1,740
28,929
Cadence Design Systems
2,801
35,182
Cirrus Logic
1,369
4,434
Cognex
883
13,721
Citrix Systems
3,152
14,505
FormFactor
719
2,659
Keysight Technologies
4,632
26,507
MKS Instruments
2,488
9,944
Novanta
598
4,783
OSI Systems
1,092
1,740
PTC
1,634
15,442
Silicon Laboratories
927
5,988
Teledyne Technologies
3,107
19,237
Teradyne
3,199
21,022
Trimble
3,242
19,471
Viavi Solutions
1,155
3,913
Financial data was based on executive compensation information for a select groupper S&P Capital IQ as of 15 peer companies. These peer companies are as follows:June 22, 2021.
Company Name
Annual
Revenue
(in millions)
Last Four Quarters
Market
Capitalization
(in millions)
ANSYS
$1,176
$15,501
Cadence Design Systems
2,028
13,021
Cirrus Logic
1,466
2,533
Cognex
821
9,426
Cypress Semiconductor
2,406
5,725
Keysight Technologies
3,709
12,163
MKS Instruments
2,125
4,723
MTS Systems
782
963
OSI Systems
1,089
1,384
PTC
1,236
11,684
Silicon Laboratories
822
4,121
Synopsys
3,023
14,906
Teledyne Technologies
2,795
8,677
Teradyne
1,997
7,329
Trimble
2,906
10,637
Financial data per S&P Research Insight as of 10/01/18
(1)
30-day average.
The Compensation Committee used the specific compensation data described above to assess the reasonableness and competitiveness of the compensation packages as a whole for our executive officers,Named Executive Officers but exercised its judgment in allocating compensation among our executive officersNamed Executive Officers and among the various elements of each individual executive officer’sNamed Executive Officer’s total compensation package.
The Compensation Committee believes that total compensation and each element of compensation at or around the 50th50th percentile of the competitive market (based on the compensation data evaluated), in each case, is the appropriate reference when determining the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Though the Compensation Committee uses such 50ththe 50th percentile as a reference point, it does not target a specific percentile in the range of comparative information for each individual executive officerNamed Executive Officer or for each element of compensation. Instead, the Compensation Committee structures the total compensation package for each executive officerNamed Executive Officer after consideration of the comparative market data and the other factors described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation—Setting Process-Settingabove under “Setting Total Direct Compensation” above.Compensation.”
Elements of Executive Compensation
The principal elements of our executive compensation program for 20192022 were as follows:
Base salary;
the AIP;
the CPB;EIP for cash incentive bonus opportunities; and
LTILong-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards.
3129

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Base Salary
Base salary represents the fixed portion of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and is an important element of compensation intended to attract and retain highly-talentedhighly talented individuals. We use base salary to provide each executive officerNamed Executive Officer with a competitive level of cash compensation during the year with the expectation that he or she will perform his or her responsibilities to the best of his or her ability and in our best interests.
Generally, we establish the initial base salaries of our Named Executive Officers through arm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire or promote the individual Named Executive Officer, taking into account his or her position, qualifications, experience, prior salary level,expectations, external market data, and the base salaries of our other executive officers.Executive Officers. Thereafter, the Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our executive officersExecutive Officers annually, with input from our President and CEO (except with respect to his own base salary) and makes adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary to reflect the scope of an executive officer’sExecutive Officer’s performance, individual contributions and responsibilities, position in the case of a promotion, and market conditions. The Compensation Committee does not use a specific formula, but instead the committee members exercise their judgment in view of our compensation philosophy and objectives.
In January 2019,2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia and the recommendations of our President and CEO (other than with respect to his own salary), as well as the other factors set forth above and described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation–Setting Process—Setting TargetAnalysis – “Compensation-Setting Process” – “Setting Total Direct Compensation” above. Following this review, the base salary increase for our CEO was recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the independent directors of the Board of Directors, and the Compensation Committee approved baseCompensation.” Base salary increases that took effect as of January 1, 2022 for eachcertain of our other Named Executive Officers are as follows:
Named Executive Officer
2018 Base
Salary
2019 Base
Salary (1)
Percentage
Adjustment
Named Executive Officer
2021
Annual Base
Salary
2022
Annual Base
Salary
Percentage
Adjustment
Alexander M. Davern
$725,004
$775,754
7.0%
Eric H. Starkloff
$735,000
$735,000
—%
Eric H. Starkloff
437,500
551,250(2)
26.0%
Karen M. Rapp
480,000
500,000
4.2%
Karen M. Rapp
393,750
413,438
5.0%
Scott A. Rust
425,000(1)
425,000
—%
Scott A. Rust
370,620
385,000
3.9%
Jason E. Green
575,000
595,000
3.5%
John C. Roiko
277,380
290,000
4.6%
Ritu Favre
425,000
450,000
5.9%
(1)

Reflects the annual salary approved by our Board of Directors. Annual base salary adjustments, if any, are generally effective January 1, 2019.
(2)
The increase reflected in Mr. Starkloff's 2019 Base Salary is largely due to his appointment as President and Chief Operating Officer, effective October 25, 2018. On October 29, 2019, Mr. Starkloff was appointed as our CEO, effective as of February 1, 2020, and continues to serve as our President. Mr. Starkloff'sRust’s base salary was increased from $412,500 to $700,000,$425,000 in connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Platform & Product, pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company, effective as of FebruaryOctober 1, 2020.2021.
The Compensation Committee increased the base salary for Ms. Favre to bring her base salary closer to the 50th percentile of the peer group. The actual base salaries paid to our Named Executive Officers in 20192022 are set forth in the “2019“2022 Summary Compensation Table” below.
AnnualExecutive Incentive PlanProgram
In 2019, NI operated the AIP to incentivize our executive officers. Under our AIP, incentive bonuses may be earned by our Named Executive Officers, based upon the achievement of corporate performance objectives and individual performance criteria. The AIPEIP is intended to promote Company performance (and, thereby, increase stockholder value and promote our successvalue) by providing incentiveour Executive Officers with the opportunity to earn cash payouts based on their level of attainment of three key pre-established corporate financial and reward foroperational objectives. Every calendar year, the accomplishment ofCompensation Committee sets key corporate financial and operational objectives bythat it considers critical to our executive officers.
Underperformance during such calendar year. For 2022, these key corporate financial and operational objectives, which were set during the AIP, each of our Named Executive Officers is eligible to receive a target incentive bonus opportunity (which is expressed as a percentagefirst quarter of the executive officer’s annual base salary as determinedyear, were:
non-GAAP organic revenue growth (excluding (i) any acquisitions by the Compensation Committee) and to earn a bonus payment based uponCompany other than N H Research, LLC or (ii) any dispositions by the attainment of corporate and individual performance objectives historically related to revenue growth, Company) (“Revenue Growth”);
non-GAAP operating margin key employee retentionlevels based on organic results (“Operating Margin”); and operating expenses, approved in accordance with the AIP. For purposes
recurring billed value of all termed software subscription license agreements and perpetual maintenance agreements normalized to a one-year period (“Software Annual Recurring Revenue”).
Refer to Annex I for a reconciliation of the AIP, the base salary amountnon-GAAP financial measures to be used to set the target incentive bonus opportunity is determined by the Compensation Committee at the time the performance goals for that year’s plan are approved.our results as reported under GAAP.
3230

TABLE OF CONTENTS

UnderAfter selecting these key corporate financial and operational objectives, the AIP,Compensation Committee, or, in the actual bonus payment that may be earned by a Named Executive Officer may be more or less thancase of our President and CEO, the target incentive bonus opportunityindependent members of our Board, based on the performance objective,recommendations of the actual performance measured against such objective,Compensation Committee, set: (1) the weighting of each performance objective for the individual Named Executive Officer, based on his or her role,key corporate financial and the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
Typically, three to five performanceoperational objectives are selected for each Named Executive Officer, that are intended to reward achievements in his or her functional area or which represent our corporate business goals(2) the target cash incentive bonus opportunity for the year. The performance objectives for our Named Executive Officers are determined by our CEO after consultation with each Named Executive Officer, expressed as a percentage of his or her base salary, and then presented(3) the different EIP payout levels based on our actual performance for each key corporate financial and operational objective, expressed as a percentage of payout which increased or decreased with Company performance.
The key corporate financial and operational objectives were weighted as follows: 50% of any payout was dependent on achieving the pre-established Revenue Growth target level, 30% of any payout was dependent on achieving the pre-established Operating Margin target level, and 20% of any payout was dependent on achieving the Software Annual Recurring Revenue target level.
After the end of the year, the payout amount for the actual level of achievement of each key corporate financial and operational objectives was determined by our CEO for approvalthe Compensation Committee. The Operating Margin payout was approved by the Compensation Committee except thatbased on our performance after adjusting the performance objectivesOperating Margin for our CEO are selected byactual annual cash incentive compensation expenses and associated payroll taxes versus related estimated expenses and taxes used when establishing the EIP payout slope. The Compensation Committee then approved the EIP payout for each Named Executive Officer, other than our President and approved byCEO, and provided a recommendation to the independent members of our Board with respect to the Board.EIP payout for our President and CEO for their consideration and approval.
The amount of the bonus for a Named Executive Officer which is allocated to each specific objective is approved each year by the Compensation Committee except thatset the performance objectives for our CEO are selected by the Compensation Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board.
The range of payouts under the AIP is 0% to 200%2022 EIP payout levels with a 50%linear payout ifslope. EIP payout levels are capped at the minimum threshold performance level for a specific objective is achieved. maximum of 200% and can be as low as zero.
The weighting and performance levelspayout level percentages for each of these performancekey corporate financial and operational objectives in 20192022, to be paid linearly between payout levels, were as follows:
Performance
Goal
Weighting
—%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
2019
Actual
2019
Goal
Payout
 
 
Payout Level
2022
Revenue Growth
50% for
Davern,
Starkloff and
Rust; 40% for
Rapp and
Roiko
<4%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
—%
—%
Objective
Weighting
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
2022
Actual
Objective
Result
2022
Objective
Payout
Percentage
Non-GAAP Operating Margin
40%
<18.3%
18.3%
18.8%
19.3%
19.5%
19.7%
20%
20.2%
18.6%
50%
Revenue Growth ($ in millions) (1)
50%
<0%
$1,619 10%
$1,766 20%
$1,913 30%
$2.060 40%
$1,633
54.8%
Key Employee Retention
10%
<94%
94%
94.5%
95%
95.5%
96%
96.5%
97%
94.5%
75%
Operating Margin (%) (1)
30%
<20.5%
20.5%
20.8%
23.3%
25.5%
19.9%
0 %
Operating Expense Budget
10% for Rapp
and Roiko
$842 million
$795 million
100%
Software Annual Recurring Revenue ($ in millions)
20%
<$208
$229
$250
$271
$292
$232
57.1%
(1)
Refer to Annex I for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results as reported under GAAP.
As indicated in theThe table above for Messrs. Davern, Starkloffsets forth the 2022 actual objective results and Rust, 50% of anythe related objective payout under the AIP is dependent on achieving revenue growth, 40% of any such payout is dependent on non-GAAP operating margin and 10% of any such payout is dependent on key employee retention. Based on achieving 50% of thepercentages. For 2022, Company performance goal for non-GAAP operating margin and 75% of key employee retention goals, these Named Executive Officers achievedcorresponded to a weighted average payout percentage of 27.5% of the total goal in 2019. The revenue growth goal was not met resulting in our Named Executive Officers receiving no payout54.8% for the revenue growth performance goal in 2019.
For Ms. Rapp and Mr. Roiko, 40% of any payout under the AIP is dependent on achieving revenue growth targets, 40% of any such payout is dependent on non-GAAP operating margin,10% of any such payout is dependent on achieving operating expense budget, and 10% of any such payout is dependent on key employee retention. Based on achieving 50% of the performance goal for non-GAAP operating margin, 75% of key employee retention and 100% of operating expense budget goals, these Named Executive Officers achieved a weighted average payout percentage of 37.5% of the total goal in 2019. The revenue growth goal was not met resulting in our Named Executive Officers receiving no payoutRevenue Growth objective, 0% for the revenue growth performance goal in 2019.
With respect to our Named Executive Officers, followingOperating Margin objective, and 57.1% for the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determined whether the AIP performance objectives of each Named Executive Officer had been attained and then approved the payment of the annual incentive bonus based upon the achievement level of such objectives, subject to its discretion. Under the AIP, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to pay all or only a portion of an annual incentive bonus to an executive officer even if he or she did not meet a particular objective, if the Compensation Committee believed that such payment was appropriate to achieve the objectives of the plan. However, for 2019, noSoftware Annual Recurring Revenue objective.
3331

TABLE OF CONTENTS

discretion was exercised by the Compensation Committee with respectThe actual EIP bonus paid to the paymenteach of annual incentive bonuses to our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Green) was calculated by multiplying (i) the aggregate weighted 2022 EIP attainment percentage (as noted in the table below) by (ii) the 2022 EIP target amount (which is equal to the Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary multiplied by the EIP target percentage). Company performance for achievementall key objectives resulted in a 2022 weighted EIP attainment percentages of their performance objectives and all payouts were based solely upon company results. 38.8% for each of our Named Executive Officers. For 2022, the EIP bonus paid to each of our Named Executive Officers was as follows:
Named Executive Officer
2022 EIP Target
Percentage
2022 EIP Target
Amount
2022 Weighted
Attainment
Percentage
2022
EIP Bonus Paid
Eric H. Starkloff
135%
$992,250
38.8%
$385,191
Karen M. Rapp
100%
500,000
38.8%
194,100
Jason E. Green (1)
100%
595,000
Scott A. Rust
100%
425,000
38.8%
164,985
Ritu Favre
100%
450,000
38.8%
174,690
(1)
Mr. Green departed from the Company effective December 31, 2022. Pursuant to the Transition Agreement and Release (the “Transition Agreement”) and the Separation Agreement and Release (the “Separation Agreement,” and together with the Transition Agreement, the “Green Transition and Separation Agreement”), Mr. Green received a lump sum payment in the amount of $595,000, which is the equivalent to 100% of his 2022 target cash incentive bonus opportunity (which was established at 100% of his annual base salary), paid at the same time the EIP bonus was paid to other Executive Officers of the Company.
The independent directors of the Board of Directors approved the annual incentive bonus for our CEO.
For 2019, the 2019 AIP bonus attainment and the amount of AIPactual bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers were as follows:
Named Executive Officer
2019
AIP Target %
2019
AIP Target $
2019 AIP Bonus
Target
Attainment %
Amount of
AIP Bonus Paid $
Alexander M. Davern
100%
$775,754
28%
$213,332
Eric H. Starkloff
70%
385,875
28%
106,116
Karen M. Rapp
50%
206,719
38%
77,520
Scott A. Rust
40%
154,000
28%
42,350
John C. Roiko
30%
87,000
38%
32,625
Annual Company Performance Bonus Program
In 2019, we maintainedfor 2022 are set forth in the CPB under which substantially all of our regular full-time and part-time employees, including our Named Executive Officers, participated. To receive a payment under the CPB and in order to incentivize employees to achieve metrics for the year that we believe are important to our stockholders, the company must achieve pre-established target levels for revenue growth and profitability that are determined at the beginning of the year. For 2019, these target levels were year-over-year organic revenue growth of 10% and non-GAAP operating income as a percentage of revenue of 18%.
Payments under the CPB are based on a bonus payment percentage multiplied by a participant’s eligible earnings. For 2019:
“Eligible earnings” included base salary, overtime pay and commissions, but excluded bonuses, equity awards, relocation payments and previous cash performance bonus payments; and
The “bonus payment percentage” for our Named Executive Officers was determined by multiplying 25% by: (i) our year-over-year organic revenue growth bonus percentage divided by the target revenue growth of 10% and (ii) our non-GAAP operating income as a percentage of revenue (limited by a cap) divided by the target non-GAAP operating income as a percentage of revenue of 18%. Expressed as a formula, the bonus payment percentage for our Named Executive Officers, was as follows:
Calendar Year Organic
Revenue Growth
X
Calendar Year Non-GAAP
Operating Income%
(not to exceed 20%
for payout purposes)
X
25%
=
Bonus Payment Percentage
10%
 
18%
 
 
 
 
For 2019, in accordance with the foregoing formula, our Named Executive Officers did not receive individual payments under the CPB.“2022 Summary Compensation Table” below.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We believe that LTIlong-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards is a critical element of our executive compensation program. The equity awards provide strong alignment between the interests of our Named Executive Officers and our stockholders. The realized value of these equity awards bears a direct relationship to our stock price, and, therefore, these awards are an incentive for our Named Executive Officers to create value for our stockholders. Equity awards also help us retain qualified executive officersNamed Executive Officers in a competitive market.
LTILong-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards are granted pursuant to the applicable equity incentive plan by the Compensation Committee, typically at a meeting of the Compensation Committee held during the first quarter of the year. In 2022, awards were granted from the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan. The amount and forms of such equity awards are determined by the Compensation Committee after considering discussions withan analysis prepared by its compensation consultant, the factors described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation-Setting Process” above and the retention power on each Named Executive Officer as determined by his or her current unvested equity holdings. The amounts of the equity awards are intended to provide competitive value that results in target total direct compensation opportunities within a competitive range of the market data relative to our compensation peer group for similar roles and positions for each of our Executive Officers. The values are also determined by other considerations such as business results, experience, and individual performance.
3432

TABLE OF CONTENTS

independentBased on our own due diligence through reviewing the competitive market and our increase in emphasis on granting performance-based long term incentive compensation, consultant,in 2022, the factors described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis— Compensation-Setting Process” above, the retention power on each Executive Officer as determined by his or her current unvested equity holdings, and the non-equity incentive plan compensation received by him or her. The amountsCompensation Committee granted PRSUs representing 60% of the equity awards are also intendedaward value under our long-term incentive program to provide competitively-sized awards and resulting target total direct compensation opportunities within a competitive range of the market median relative to our compensation peer group and Radford survey data for similar roles and positions for each of our Named Executive Officers, taking into consideration business results, compensation relativewhile the other 40% of the equity award value consisted of time-based RSUs. The mix is aligned with the practices of our peer group. From 2019 to other executives, experience and individual performance.
In 2019, in response to feedback received from our stockholders,2021, the Compensation Committee addedpreviously granted PRSUs representing 50% of the equity award value assuming the value per unit is equal to our stock price on the grant date, to our LTI program for our Named Executive Officers (other than our President and CEO), while the other 50% of theirthe equity award value consisted of RSUs.
We believe that our use of performance-based long term incentive compensation is important to strengthening the alignment between our Named Executive Officers’ compensation and creation of stockholder value, while also driving the achievement of our financial and operational goals. The following table shows the target number of shares for the PRSUsunits pursuant to PRSU awards granted to each of our Named Executive Officers in 2019:January 2022. Each unit granted pursuant to the PRSU awards represented a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock for each unit earned for the Performance Period
Named Executive Officer
Target PRSUs
Target Grant Date
Fair Value (1)
Named Executive Officer
Target PRSUs
Target Grant Date
Fair Value (1)
Alexander M. Davern (2)
53,000
$2,997,309
Eric H. Starkloff
84,526
$4,976,891
Eric H. Starkloff (3)
16,625
975,274
Karen M. Rapp
21,136
1,277,883
Karen M. Rapp (3)
13,006
762,972
Jason E. Green (2)
23,954
1,448,259
Scott A. Rust (3)
8,482
497,580
Scott A. Rust
15,500
937,130
John C. Roiko (3)
1,696
99,493
Ritu Favre
19,727
1,192,694
(1)

The fair valuesvalue of the PRSUs arewas estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation.simulation model. The determination of fair value of the PRSUs is affected by our stock price and a number of assumptions including the expected volatility, expected dividend yield, and the risk-free interest rate. Our expected volatility at the date of grant was based on the historical volatilities of our common stock and the companies included in the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”) over the three-year performance period.
(2)
Grant date fair value is basedperiod that commenced on the grant date of FebruaryJanuary 1, 2019. On October 29, 2019, we announced that Mr. Davern would remain as our CEO until January2022 and will end on December 31, 2020, and then transition from his service as our CEO into a strategic advisory role until May 5, 20202024 (the “Termination Date”“Performance Period”). Pursuant to Mr. Davern’s Transition Agreement, all of Mr. Davern's PRSUs will be forfeited as of the Termination Date.
(3)
Grant date fair value is based on the grant date of January 22, 2019.18, 2022 (for the awards granted to Ms. Rapp, Mr. Green, Mr. Rust and Ms. Favre) and January 19, 2022 (for the award granted to our President and CEO).
(2)
Mr. Green departed from the Company effective December 31, 2022. Pursuant to the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, any PRSUs that were to be earned and unvested after his date of termination would not vest and will be forfeited. Thus, Mr. Green’s 2022 PRSUs were forfeited in connection with his departure.
The 20192022 PRSUs may be earned and eligible for vesting based on our total shareholder return defined previouslyTSR compared to the TSR of the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”) over a three-year performance period that commenced on January 1, 2019, and will end on December 31, 2021the Performance Period of three years (using the average daily closing price of our common stock over a 30-day lookback period in each case). A linear calculation is performed between the stated percentiles to determine actual number of PRSUs earned at the end of the Performance Period.
The Compensation Committee set the target at the 55th percentile of the Index to incentivize above-median performance. The number of shares of NI common stockunits subject to the 2022 PRSU awards will be earned from 0% to 200% of the target number of sharesunits based on our TSR compared to the Index as follows:
Payout Level
TSR Percentile Rank Against

the Russell 2000 Index
Payout Percentage of Target

Number of Shares
Maximum
≥80th Percentile
200%
Stretch
65th Percentile
150%
Target
55th Percentile
100%
Threshold
25th Percentile
50%
None
<25th Percentile
0%
Each unit granted pursuant to the PRSU awards represented a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock for each unit earned for the performance period.
3533

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows the number of shares subjectunits pursuant to the RSUstime-based RSU awards granted to each of our Named Executive Officers in 2019:January 2022:
Named Executive Officer
RSUs
(number of shares)
Grant
Date Fair Value (1)
Named Executive Officer
RSUs
(Number of Shares)
Grant
Date Fair Value (1)
Alexander M. Davern (2)
53,000
$2,343,660
Eric H. Starkloff
56,351
$2,289,541
Eric H. Starkloff
16,625
762,589
Karen M. Rapp
14,091
587,877
Karen M. Rapp
13,006
596,585
Jason E. Green (2)
15,969
666,227
Scott A. Rust
8,482
389,069
Scott A. Rust
10,333
431,093
John C. Roiko
1,696
77,796
Ritu Favre
13,151
548,660
(1)
The fair values of RSUs are estimated using their market price on the date of grant.
(2)

The fair value of Mr. Davern’s 2019 RSU grant, excluding forfeitures pursuantRSUs was estimated using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately prior to arrangements under the Transition Agreement as of October 28, 2019, was $723,464, based on NI’s closing stock price on such date of $40.95 per share.grant. The 2022 RSUs were granted to each of Ms. Rapp, Mr. Davern is expectedGreen, Mr. Rust and Ms. Favre on January 18, 2022 and to receive upon signingour President and CEO on January 19, 2022.
(2)
Mr. Green departed from the Company effective December 31, 2022. Pursuant to the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, the portion of his Separation Agreement (as defined in the Transition Agreement) in May 2020, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards subject solely to service-based vesting2022 RSU award that would have vested from October 29, 2019had Mr. Green remained employed through May 5, 2021.December 31, 2023 (representing 5,323 units) were accelerated and vested upon his departure on December 31, 2022. Each unit that was accelerated pursuant to the RSU award represented a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock for each unit that vested. The fair valueremaining portion of Mr. Davern’s 2019his 2022 RSU grant,award with vesting dates after such acceleration under the Separation Agreement as of October 28, 2019, was $1,410,359, basedDecember 31, 2023 were forfeited upon his departure on our closing stock price on such date of $40.95 per share.December 31, 2022.
The 20192022 RSUs vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period, with the first installment vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grantMay 1, 2023, contingent upon the Named Executive Officer remaining continuously employed by us through each applicable vesting date.
The overall LTIvalue of the long-term incentive equity award value for our President and CEO and our other Named Executive Officers was determined after consideration of multiple factors as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Analysis — Compensation–Setting Process” section of this Proxy Statement.above. Such factors include a competitive market assessment,analysis prepared by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant as well as the current retention incentive for each Named Executive Officer as determined by his or her current unvested equity holdings, and the amount of non-equity incentive plan compensation received by him or her.holdings.
The equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers in 20192022 are set forth in the 2019 “Summary“2022 Summary Compensation Table” and the 2019 “Grants“2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below. With respect
The PRSU awards previously granted in 2020 and 2021 to equityour Named Executive Officers were also measured against the Index. The performance period for the PRSU awards granted in 2020 began on January 1, 2020 and ended on December 31, 2022 (the “2020 Performance Period”). The performance period for the PRSU awards granted in 2021 began on January 1, 2021 and will end on December 31, 2023 (the “2021 Performance Period”).
For the 2020 Performance Period, our TSR ranked in the 48.54 percentile as compared to the Index, such that 89% of the PRSUs granted in 2020 were earned and vested as of December 31, 2022. The following table shows the total number PRSUs granted to Mr. Starkloff pursuant toour Named Executive Officers in January or February 2020, the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement entered into on October 28, 2019vesting percentage and the treatmentnumber of Mr. Davern's equity pursuant to Mr. Davern's Transition Agreement, please refer to “2019 Executive Compensation Highlights” above.vested PRSUs as of December 31, 2022.
Named Executive Officer (1)
PRSUs Granted in
2020
Vesting
Percentage
Number of Vested
Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Units
Eric H. Starkloff (2)
100,471
89%
89,419
Karen M. Rapp
15,657
89%
13,934
Jason E. Green (3)
11,184
89%
9,953
Scott A. Rust
8,947
89%
7,962
(1)
Ms. Favre was not eligible for a PRSU award in 2020 because she was not an Executive Officer.
(2)
Mr. Starkloff’s PRSU awards were made pursuant to the Executive Employment Agreement, dated October 28, 2019, and include a one-time promotional award of 75,000 PRSUs granted on February 1, 2020 and a supplemental award of 25,471 PRSUs granted on April 29, 2020.
(3)
Pursuant to the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, the PRSUs granted to Mr. Green in 2020 vested at the end of the 2020 Performance Period. Each unit granted pursuant to the 2020 PRSU awards represented a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock for each unit earned for the 2020 Performance Period.
34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Health and Other Benefits
Our Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive an annual executive physical as well as the sameother employee benefits that are generally available to all our full-time employees, subject to the satisfaction of certain eligibility requirements. These benefits include flexible spending accounts, medical, dental and vision benefits, business travel insurance, employee assistance program, basic life insurance benefits, accidental death and dismemberment insurance policies, short-term and long-term disability insurance, and commuter benefits and reimbursement or payment for mobile phone coverage.benefits. In structuring these programs, we seek to provide an aggregate level of benefits that are comparable to those provided by similar companies, compliant with applicable laws and affordable to employees.
We maintain a tax-qualified Section 401(k) retirement savings plan (the “Section 401(k) Plan”) that provides eligible employees, including our Named Executive Officers, with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. In 2019,2022, we made matching contributions under the Section 401(k) Plan in an amount equal to 50% of the amount of the employee’sparticipant’s contribution up to 8% of the employee’sparticipant’s eligible compensation, after the employee's first year of service. All participants’ interests in the matching contributions vest immediately from the time of contribution. Pre-tax contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participants’ directions. The Section 401(k) Plan is intended to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the Section 401(k) Plan and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the Section 401(k) Plan, and all contributions are deductible by us when made. The Section 401(k) Plan does not provide for purchases of our stock.
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We also maintain an employee stock purchase planthe 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). The ESPP is generally intended to qualify as a tax-favored employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Code. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchaseacquire shares of NIour common stock at a 15% discount topurchase price of 85% of the lower of the market price.price at the beginning or the end of the purchase period. Under this plan, a participant can invest a maximum amount equal to 15% of eligible compensation, provided that such amount cannot exceed $25,000 in any year.
In structuring these benefit programs, we seek to provide an aggregate level of benefits that are comparable to those provided by similar companies.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
We do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a significant component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to our Named Executive Officers.
During 2019,2022, none of our Named Executive Officers received perquisites or other personal benefits that were, in the aggregate, valued at $10,000 or more for each individual.
In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits in limited circumstances. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be approved and subject to periodic review by the Compensation Committee.
Employment Arrangements and Post-Employment Compensation
On October 28, 2019, we entered into the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement, a written executive employment agreement, with our current President and CEO, Mr. Starkloff, in connection with his appointment as CEO, effective February 1, 2020, andWe have written employment offer lettersagreements with certaineach of our other Named Executive Officers. In filling each of our executive positions, we recognized the need to develop competitive compensation packages to attract qualified candidates in a dynamic labor market. At the same time, in formulating these compensation packages, we were sensitive to the need to integrate new executive officersExecutive Officers into the executive compensation structure that we were seeking to develop, balancing both competitive and internal equity considerations. These arrangements provide for “at will” employment.
The terms and conditions of employment of Mr. Starkloff as set forth in the Starkloffeach of our Named Executive Employment Agreement alsoOfficers contain post-employment compensation arrangements that provide Mr. Starkloffthese Named Executive Officers with certain protection in the event of histheir termination of employment in specified circumstances such as involuntarily termination without Cause (including death or Disability) or for resignation for Good Reason, including followingwithin a Change in Control (each as defined in the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement). In addition, the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement provides that in the event of a Change in Control, and if Mr. Starkloff is terminated other than for Cause or resigns for Good Reason within a limited period of time after the Change in Control, Mr. Starkloff would be entitled to certain severance payments. These agreements provide for “double-trigger” payments and benefits which means that payments and benefits will not become payable unless both events occur. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below for a further description.
The terms and conditions oftheir employment for Mr. Davern, our prior CEO, were superseded by his Transition Agreement, pursuant to which Mr. Davern transitioned from his service as CEO on January 31, 2020 into a strategic advisory role whereby he is providing certain transition and advisory services through May 5, 2020 (the “Transition Period”)agreements).
During the Transition Period, Mr. Davern will receive his 2019 base salary and benefits. He was eligible to participate in the AIP and annual cash bonus performance program for 2019, but not for any period thereafter. If either NI terminatesWe believe that the employment of Mr. Davern without Cause (as defined in the Transition Agreement) or the parties mutually agree to terminate prior to May 5, 2020, Mr. Davern will receive a lump sum reflecting any remaining base salary that would have been received under the Transition Agreement, and, provided Mr. Davern signs his Separation Agreement, the benefits offered under the Separation Agreement. If Mr. Davern signs his Separation Agreement, Mr. Davern’s equity awards that are subject only to time-based vesting, and scheduled to vest prior to May 5, 2021, will vest upon signing. Mr. Davern's unvested PRSUs are forfeited as of the Termination Date pursuant to the Transition Agreement. Mr. Davern’s health continuation coverage costs will be paid through May 5, 2021.
We do not have specific post-employment compensation arrangements in place with any of our other Named Executive Officers. However, the terms of Mr. Rust’s employment provide for acceleration of certain restricted stock units in the event of his termination under certain circumstances. Each of ourexisting Named Executive Officers have PRSUsincentivized these individuals to accept and retain their positions. We also believe that the employment arrangements help maintain their
3735

TABLE OF CONTENTS

under our 2015 Incentive Plan with special vesting terms upon a change in control as further described below. For detailed descriptions of the employment arrangements we maintained with our Named Executive Officers for 2019 as well as an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable under these arrangements, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” below.
We believe that these protections were necessary to induce these individuals to accept their positions. We also believe that these arrangements help maintain their continued focus and dedication to their assigned duties to maximize stockholder value. The Board considered the recommendation of the Compensation Committee (and, with respect to our President and CEO, the independent members of our Board) reviewed the proposed terms of these arrangements and deemed it to be in our best interests and the best interests of NI and itsour stockholders to approve the terms of such arrangements.
We do not use excise tax payments (or “gross-ups”) relating to a change in control of NIthe Company and have no such obligations in place with respect to any of our Named Executive Officers.
For (i) detailed descriptions of the employment arrangements we maintain with our Named Executive Officers, (ii) an estimate of the potential payments and benefits payable under these arrangements to the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Green) as of December 31, 2022 and (iii) a detailed description of the severance payments and benefits paid to Mr. Green in connection with his departure at the end of 2022, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
Equity Compensation Plans Terms
In addition, our equity compensation plans provide for the acceleration of vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards in certain circumstances. Specifically, the 2005 Incentive Plan and the 2010 Incentive Plan provide thatSee “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in the event ofControl” below for a change of control of NI, all outstanding and unvested restricted stock unit awards held by our employees, including our Named Executive Officers, will immediately vest in full. Further, under the 2015 Incentive Plan, in the event of a change in control of NI, all outstanding and unvested equity awards will be treated as determined by the plan administrator, including that each award be assumed or substituted by the successor corporation; provided, however, that, in the event the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for the awards, the restriction period of any award of restricted stock or restricted stock unit award will immediately be accelerated and the restrictions will expire.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the 2015 Incentive Plan, with respect to PRSUs, if a change of control occurs before the last day of the performance period, and such PRSUs are accelerated, rather than vesting based on our TSR relative to the Index during the performance period, the number of PRSUs eligible to vest will equal 100% of the target number of PRSUs. The number of PRSUs so determined will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments following the change of control over the remainder of the original performance period. Following any assumption or substitution of such awards, if the employment of an employee is terminated without Cause (as defined in the 2015 Incentive Plan) within 24 months following the change in control of NI, then the vesting of such employee’s award will immediately accelerate and the restricted stock, RSU and PRSU awards will immediately become fully vested. There are no significant modifications to the change of control provisions in the proposed 2020 Incentive Plan compared to the 2015 Incentive Plan.further description.
Other Compensation Policies
Equity Award Grant Policy
We do not have any program, plan or practice to time the grant of equity awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information. In addition, we do not time, nor do we plan to time, the release of material non-public information for the purposes of affecting the value of our executive compensation.
Stock Ownership Policy
We encourage our Named Executive Officers and members of our Board of Directors to hold a significant equity interest in NI. To that end, our Board initially adoptedhave a Stock Ownership Policy effective December 31, 2017 (the “2017 Policy”) to further align the interests offor our NamedPresident and CEO, other Executive Officers, and the non-employee members of our Board, which is intended to further align the interests of Directorssuch individuals with the interests of our stockholders and to promote our commitment to good corporate governance. On October 23, 2019, the Board determined to increase the stock ownership thresholds of our CEO and non-employee members of the Board from three to six times his or her annual salary or annual retainer and adopted a newOur Stock Ownership Policy, effective December 31, 2019 (the “2019 Policy”). The guidelines established under our stock ownership policies are intended to take into account an individual’s needs for portfolio diversification, while maintaining an ownership interest at levels sufficient to assure our stockholders of leadership’s commitment to long-term value creation.
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our 2017 Policy requires that:
our President and CEO hold shares of NIour common stock having a value equal to at least threesix times his annual base salary;
our other Named Executive Officers hold shares of NIour common stock having a value equal to at least two times his or her annual base salary; and
the non-employee members of our Board hold shares of NI common stock having a value equal to at least three times the amount of the annual retainer paid to such director for his or her service on our Board.
Our 2019 Policy requires that:
our CEO hold shares of NI common stock having a value equal to at least six times his annual base salary;
our other Named Executive Officers hold shares of NI common stock having a value equal to at least two times his or her annual base salary; and
the non-employee members of our Board hold shares of NI common stock having a value equal to at least six times the amount of the annual retainer paid to such director for his or her service on our Board.
EachUnder our Stock Ownership Policy, eligible stock ownership includes: (i) shares owned directly by the Executive Officer or non-employee member of our stock ownership policies requireBoard or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household, and (ii) shares held in trust for the benefit of the Executive Officer or non-employee member of our Board or his or her family. The value of each share is measured on the last day of the fiscal year as the greater of (i) the closing price on the date of calculation and (ii) the purchase price actually paid by the person for such share.
The Stock Ownership Policy requires that our President and CEO, our Namedother Executive Officers, and the non-employee members of our Board of Directors achieve the applicable levels of ownership within five years after the later of (i) the effective date of the applicable policy, or (ii) the date of his or her appointment. The 2017 Policy continues to apply for those Named Executive Officers and non-employee directors who were subject to the 2017 Policy as of December 31, 2019, and such Named Executive Officers and non-employee directors will continue to be required to achieve the applicable level of ownership set forth in the 2017 Policy in addition to the 2019 Policy. Stock ownership which qualifies under either the 2017 Policy or 2019 Policy will also qualify in determining stock ownership for the other policy.
Compensation Clawback Policy
Currently, weWe have not implemented a policy regarding retroactive adjustmentsClawback Policy applicable to any cashcurrent and former Executive Officers. Pursuant to the Clawback Policy, if an Executive Officer engages in fraud, intentional misconduct or gross negligence that causes or partially causes the restatement of our financial statements due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements, the Compensation Committee may require such Executive Officer to reimburse or forfeit all or a portion
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of any excess incentive compensation (cash or equity-based incentive compensationcompensation) that is paid to, our Namedawarded to, or received by such Executive Officers or other employees where the payments were predicated uponOfficer based on the achievement of financial resultsor stock performance metrics, and which was awarded on or after January 1, 2022 and paid in the preceding three-year period from the time we determine that were subsequently the subject of awe must restate our financial restatement. statements.
We intend to adopt a clawbackgeneral compensation recovery policy (or modify our existing Clawback Policy) covering our short-term and long-term incentive award plans and arrangements once the SEC adopts final rules implementing the requirement of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.Nasdaq has adopted an SEC-approved listing standard that complies with Exchange Act Rule 10D-1.
Derivative Trading, Short Sales, Margin Accounts and Hedging
Our Insider Trading Policy applies to all members of our Board, our officers, employees, consultants, contractors, agents or other service providers to us. Pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy, we do not permit our executive officers or the non-employee membersshort sales of our Boardsecurities, or trading in publicly-traded options, such as puts and calls, and other derivative securities with respect to our securities (other than stock options, restricted stock units and other compensatory awards issued by us) or purchasing financial instruments, or otherwise engaging in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of Directors to sell short our securities.equity securities either granted by us as part of compensation, or held, directly or indirectly by an individual.
In addition, we prohibit those persons subject to our executive officers and the non-employee members of our Board of Directorsquarterly blackout periods from holding our securities in a margin account. We further prohibitaccount or pledging our securities as collateral for any loan or as part of any other pledging transaction. Persons subject to our quarterly blackout periods include our executive officersleadership team and our non-employeetheir direct reports, certain members of our Board of Directors from purchasing or selling publicly-traded optionsthe accounting and other derivatives with respect to our securities, including for any hedging or similar transaction. Our Insider Trading Policy discourages, but does not prohibit, our other employees from engaging in anyfinance departments identified by their respective executive leadership team member as having specialized knowledge, certain members of the typessales department identified by their respective executive leadership team member as having specialized knowledge, all members of transactions described above.the legal department, persons who receive or have access to certain reports or systems, or otherwise have access to companywide monthly, quarterly, or annual financial results, and, if applicable, any additional employee otherwise notified in writing by the legal department.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
In designing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considers the anticipated tax and accounting implications to NIus and our executive officers.Executive Officers. While the Compensation Committee considers the applicable tax and accounting treatment of the elements of our executive compensation program, these factors are not dispositive in its decision making.
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Code imposes a limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of any remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to our CEO, Chief Financial Officer,CFO, and eachcertain of the next three most highly-compensatedour other executive officers of the company. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the exemption for the chief financial officer and for “performance-based compensation” beginning January 1, 2018. As a result, subject to certain limited exceptions, weofficers. We expect that compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million
39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

generally will not be deductible. While the Compensation Committee has taken steps in the past to preserve tax deductibility under Section 162(m), it has retained and will continue to retain authority to approve compensation arrangements that may not be fully tax deductible by reason of Section 162(m).
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officersExecutive Officers and other employees including Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718,718”), the standard which governs the accounting treatment of certain stock-based compensation. Among other things, FASB ASC Topic 718 requires NIus to record a compensation expense in itsour income statement for all equity awards granted to our executive officersExecutive Officers and other employees. This compensation expense is based on the grant date “fair value”fair value of the equity award and, in most cases, will be recognized ratably over the award’s requisite service period (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule). This compensation expense is also reported in the Summary Compensation Table, even though recipients may never realize any value from their equity awards.
Compensation Committee Report*
The Compensation Committee of NI has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Regulation S-K Item 402(b) with management and based upon such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Respectfully Submitted,
Duy-Loan T. Le, Chair
Dr. Gerhard P. Fettweis
Liam K. Griffin
Charles J. Roesslein
*
The foregoing Report of the Compensation Committee is not to be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or we specifically incorporate it by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
4037

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table
The following table shows the total compensation earned by NI’s Named Executive Officers during the years ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017:
Name and
Principal Position
Year
Salary
Bonus
(1)
Stock
Awards
(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
All Other
Compensation
(4)
Total
Alexander M. Davern*
Chief Executive Officer
2019
$775,754
$1,000
$7,474,792 (5)
$213,332
$23,096
$8,487,974
2018
725,004
2,213,100
599,584
11,208
3,548,896
2017
700,000
6,364,500
429,800
11,208
7,505,508
Eric H. Starkloff**
President and Chief Operating Officer
2019
551,250
1,737,863
106,116
50,645
2,445,874
2018
437,500
2,156,673
228,813
19,343
2,842,329
2017
400,000
1,000
855,750
171,804
36,195
1,464,749
Karen M. Rapp
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
2019
413,438
1,359,557
77,520
10,448
1,860,964
2018
393,750
983,600
176,006
5,002
1,558,358
2017
241,587
861,000
80,546
40,318
1,223,450
Scott A. Rust
Senior Vice President, Global Product
Research and Development
2019
385,000
886,650
42,350
11,160
1,325,160
2018
370,620
801,880
165,668
10,588
1,348,756
2017
355,000
684,600
125,670
32,799
1,198,069
John C. Roiko
Vice President, Finance and Chief
Accounting Officer
2019
290,000
177,288
32,625
9,543
509,457
2018
277,380
1,000
149,704
71,286
9,364
508,735
2017
268,000
136,920
50,652
59,226
514,798
*
On October 29, 2019, NI announced that Mr. Davern would remain as CEO of NI until January 31, 2020, and then transition into a strategic advisory role until May 5, 2020.
**
On October 29, 2019, NI announced that Mr. Starkloff was appointed as our CEO, effective February 1, 2020, and continues to serve as President. Mr. Starkloff's base salary increased to $700,000 effective as of February 1, 2020. Mr. Starkloff was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer in October 2018 and received a salary increase at that time. Mr. Starkloff’s salary shown for 2018 above is pro-rated based upon the number of days during the year the increased salary was in effect.
(1)
These amounts reflect cash payments under NI’s service award program under which all employees, including executives, are eligible to receive awards based on the number of years of continued employment with NI. Awards under this program have historically been in the range of $100 to $1,000 per award, with employees receiving $100 in cash at their 5th anniversary of service with NI and $1,000 in cash at their 10th, 15th, 20th and 25th anniversaries of service with NI.
41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2)
The amounts included in the table for stock awards is the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the applicable fiscal year in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. These dollar amounts reflect NI’s accounting expense for these stock awards and may not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers. The dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes is the aggregate grant date fair value, which is expensed monthly based on the estimated vesting period of the corresponding grant. The estimated vesting period of grants of RSUs to Named Executive Officers ranges from 36 months to 108 months. The fair values of target PRSUs at the grant date are estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The determination of fair value of PRSUs was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The determination of fair value of the PRSU is affected by our stock price and a number of assumptions including the expected volatility, expected dividend yield, and the risk-free interest rate. Our expected volatility at the date of grant was based on the historical volatilities of our common stock and the companies included in the Index over the performance period.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Based upon such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting.
Respectfully Submitted,
Duy-Loan T. Le, Chair
James E. Cashman, III
Gayla J. Delly
Dr. Gerhard P. Fettweis
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation Tables
2022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table shows the total compensation earned by our Named Executive Officers during the years ended December 31, 2022, December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020. Information is not included for Ms. Favre for the year ended December 31, 2020 as she was not a Named Executive Officer in such year:
Name
and Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total ($)
Eric H. Starkloff
President and CEO
2022
735,000
7,266,432
385,191
11,881
8,398,504
2021
735,000
6,659,514
785,763
10,108
8,190,385
2020
629,271
10,414,680
411,075
10,608
11,465,634
Karen M. Rapp*
Former Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
2022
500,000
100,000
1,865,759
194,100
7,860
2,667,719
2021
480,000
3,580,931
380,112
8,260
4,449,303
2020
439,795
1,677,021
159,703
8,093
2,284,612
Jason E. Green*
Former Chief Revenue Officer
and Executive Vice President
2022
595,000
2,114,486
1,476,812
4,186,298
2021
575,000
200,000
2,088,851
364,274
10,110
3,238,235
2020
551,042
100,284
1,197,918
193,200
10,110
2,052,554
Scott A. Rust
Executive Vice President,
Global Operations
2022
425,000
1,368,223
164,985
15,423
1,973,631
2021
415,625
979,152
243,386
13,485
1,651,648
2020
383,717
1,000
958,313
113,213
11,760
1,468,003
Ritu Favre
Executive Vice President & GM,
Business Units
2022
450,000
1,741,354
174,690
13,860
2,415,377
2021
425,000
1,566,666
336,558
11,760
2,339,984
*
Mr. Rapp resigned as our Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 9, 2023. Mr. Green departed from the Company as our Chief Revenue Officer and Executive Vice President, effective December 31, 2022.
(1)
In 2022, Ms. Rapp received a $100,000 retention cash bonus paid in four quarterly installments during 2022.
In 2021, Mr. Green received a $200,000 performance bonus based on the Portfolio BU’s performance during that year. In 2020, Mr. Green received a service award of $284 and a $100,000 transition payment as the Compensation Committee approved transferring Mr. Green from a sales-based incentive compensation plan to the EIP. The transition payment was intended to compensate Mr. Green for the short-term negative impact on his compensation caused by his being transferred to the EIP.
In 2020, Mr. Rust received a service award of $1,000. All employees, including executives, are eligible under our service award program pursuant to which employees may receive awards based on the number of years of continued employment with us. Awards under the service award program have historically been in the range of $100 to $1,000 per award, with employees receiving $100 in cash at their 5th anniversary of service with us and $1,000 in cash at their 10th, 15th, 20th and 25th anniversaries of service with us.
(2)
The amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in each fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The grant date fair value for time-based RSUs is measured in accordance with FASB ASC 718 and based on the closing price of our common stock on the date preceding the date of grant. The grant date fair value for PRSUs is calculated using a Monte-Carlo model for each award on the date of grant, as determined under FASB ASC 718, based on the probable outcome of the performance condition as of the grant date. The fair value for each award may differ based on the applicable data, assumptions, and estimates used in the model. Our expected volatility at the date of grant was based on the historical volatilities of our common stock and the companies included in the Index over the performance period. Although the assumed probable outcome as of the grant date was achievement at the target level, the terms of the awards for PRSUs also provide for achievement of up to 200% of the target amount (the “maximum”). See Note 5 below for additional information regarding Mr. Davern's equity awards. The table below presents the aggregate grant date fair value of stockthe PRSU awards for the periods presentedgranted in 2022, assuming achievement atof the maximum performance level for PRSUs:of 200%, would have been: Mr. Starkloff: $9,953,782; Ms. Rapp: $2,555,765; Mr. Green: $2,896,518; Mr. Rust: $1,874,260; and Ms. Favre: $2,385,389.
Name and
Principal Position
Year
RSU Award
PRSU Award at
Maximum Level
Total
Alexander M. Davern
Chief Executive Officer
2019
$2,343,660
$4,687,320
$7,030,980
2018
2,213,100
��
2,213,100
2017
6,364,500
6,364,500
Eric H. Starkloff
President and Chief Operating Officer
2019
762,589
1,525,178
2,287,767
2018
2,156,673
2,156,673
2017
855,750
855,750
Karen M. Rapp
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
2019
596,585
1,193,170
1,789,755
2018
983,600
983,600
2017
861,000
861,000
Scott A. Rust
Senior Vice President, Global Product Research and Development
2019
389,069
778,139
1,167,208
2018
801,880
801,880
2017
684,600
684,600
John C. Roiko
Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
2019
77,796
155,591
233,387
2018
149,704
149,704
2017
136,920
136,920
(3)
These amounts reflect the sum of the amounts earned by Named Executives Officers under the CPB and AIP for 2019, 2018 and 2017, as shown in the table below:
Named Executive Officer
Year
CPB
AIP
Total
Alexander M. Davern
2019
$
$  213,332
$  213,332
2018
48,581
551,003
599,584
2017
37,800
392,000
429,800
Eric H. Starkloff
2019
106,116
106,116
2018
29,313
199,500
228,813
2017
21,804
150,000
171,804
Karen M. Rapp
2019
77,520
77,520
2018
26,381
149,625
176,006
2017
13,046
67,500
80,546
Scott A. Rust
2019
42,350
42,350
2018
24,832
140,836
165,668
2017
19,170
106,500
125,670
John C. Roiko
2019
32,625
32,625
2018
18,584
52,702
71,286
2017
14,472
36,180
50,652
4239

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For Mr. Starkloff, the amount reflected in the “Stock Awards” column above for 2020 includes a one-time promotional grant of 75,000 PRSUs and 75,000 RSUs, granted pursuant to the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement, in connection with appointment of Mr. Starkloff as our President and CEO.
For Mr. Rapp, the amount reflected in the “Stock Awards” column above for 2021 includes a one-time retention award of 27,700 RSUs granted on April 20, 2021, with a grant date fair value of $1,230,988.
(3)
The amounts represent the cash bonus earned by Named Executive Officers pursuant to the EIP for 2022, 2021, and 2020.
(4)

TheseThe amounts represent NICompany contributions to the Section 401(k) Plan on behalf of the Named Executive Officers, the full dollar value of premiums paid by NIus for term life insurance on behalf of the Named Executive Officers for 2019, 2018 and 2017, and certain other payments in the amounts shown below:
Named Executive Officer
Year
NI
Contributions
to 401(k)
Plan
Term Life
Insurance
Premium Paid
by NI for
Benefit of the
Insured
Other *
Total
Named Executive Officer
Year
NI
Contributions
to 401(k)
Plan ($)
Term Life
Insurance
Premium Paid
by NI for
Benefit of the
Insured ($)
Other ($) *
Total ($)
Alexander M. Davern
2019
td0,800
$360
$11,936
td3,096
Eric H. Starkloff
2022
9,958
360
1,563
11,881
2018
10,800
408
11,208
2021
8,748
360
1,000
10,108
2017
10,800
408
11,208
2020
8,748
360
1,500
10,608
Eric H. Starkloff
2019
8,748
360
41,537
50,645
Karen M. Rapp
2022
7,500
360
7,860
2018
8,748
408
10,187
19,343
2021
7,900
360
8,260
2017
8,748
408
27,039
37,195
2020
7,733
360
8,093
Karen M. Rapp
2019
10,088
360
10,448
Jason E. Green
2022
13,500
360
1,462,952
1,476,812
2018
4,594
408
5,002
2021
9,750
360
10,110
2017
318
40,000
40,318
2020
9,750
360
10,110
Scott A. Rust
2019
10,800
360
11,160
Scott A. Rust
2022
13,500
360
1,563
15,423
2018
10,180
408
10,588
2021
11,625
360
1,500
13,485
2017
8,640
408
23,751
32,799
2020
11,400
360
11,760
John C. Roiko
2019
9,183
360
9,543
Ritu Favre
2022
13,500
360
13,860
2018
8,956
408
9,364
2021
11,400
360
11,760
2017
8,818
408
50,000
59,226
*
The dollar amounts listed in “Other” for Mr. Starkloff reflect fees and expenses paid related to contributions by us to Mr. Starkloff’s health spending account paid in 2022, 2021 and 2020.
The dollar amounts listed in “Other” for Mr. Green reflect: the payments and benefits provided to Mr. Green in connection with his departure from the Company effective December 31, 2022 as required by the terms of the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, consisting of: (i) the payment of $10,000 for executive transition services; (ii) a lump sum payment in the amount of $595,000, which is the equivalent to 100% of his 2022 target cash incentive bonus opportunity (which was established at 100% of his annual base salary), paid at the same time as the other executive officers, (iii) the reimbursement, or payment directly on his behalf, for the premiums for COBRA through December 31, 2023, or the date that he becomes eligible for coverage under a subsequent employer’s plan (estimated at $24,676) and (iv) $833,276, representing the value of the portion of Mr. Green’s outstanding time-based RSU awards that were accelerated as of his date of termination. For more information about Mr. Green’s severance payments and benefits, see “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.
The dollar amounts listed in “Other” for Mr. Rust reflect Mr. Rust’s health spending account for 2022 and 2021.
The dollar amounts listed in “Other” for Ms. Favre reflect amount paid by NI in connection with Ms. Favre’s participation in an incentive award trip.
Other than the foregoing, for 2019, 2018 and 2017, NI did not provide its Named Executive Officers with any form of compensation that would be reportable under Item 402(c)(2)(ix) of Regulation S-K.S-K for the years reported in the table. NI does not pay or accrue cash dividends on unvested RSUs.
*
For 2019, the dollar amounts listed in “Other” reflect fees and expenses paid by NI related to the negotiation of Mr. Davern's Transition Agreement and Mr. Starkloff's Executive Employment Agreement and amounts paid by NI in connection with Mr. Starkloff’s participation in an incentive award trip. For 2018, the dollar amounts listed in “Other” reflect amounts paid by NI in connection with Mr. Starkloff’s participation in an incentive award trip. For 2017, the dollar amounts listed in “Other” reflect amounts paid by NI in connection with Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Rust’s participation in an incentive award trip, a signing bonus paid to Ms. Rapp upon her employment as Chief Financial Officer and a bonus paid to Mr. Roiko as Interim Chief Financial Officer.
(5)
The disclosed number reflects a calculation made pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718 which requires disclosure of the combined value of Mr. Davern's Original Grant Value (defined below) and the incremental fair value of the unvested RSUs described below. Mr. Davern, our Chief Executive Officer during 2019, was granted 53,000 RSUs and 53,000 PRSUs in February 2019 with an aggregate grant date fair value of $5,340,969 (“Original Grant Value”). On October 29, 2019, we announced that Mr. Davern would remain as CEO of NI until January 31, 2020, and then transition from his service as CEO of NI into a strategic advisory role until May 5, 2020. Pursuant to Mr. Davern’s Transition Agreement, effective October 28, 2019, all of Mr. Davern’s PRSUs are forfeited and Mr. Davern is expected to receive upon signing of his Separation Agreement in May 2020, accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards subject solely to service-based vesting that would have vested from October 29, 2019 through May 5, 2021. All of Mr. Davern’s unvested RSUs subject to outstanding equity awards other than those subject to such accelerated vesting are forfeited as of the Termination Date pursuant to his Transition Agreement. The amount included in the table for Mr. Davern’s stock awards in 2019 reflects the incremental fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, associated with the acceleration of such RSUs of $2,133,823 plus the Original Grant Value. Such amount does not deduct a value for RSUs or PRSUs forfeited by Mr. Davern upon signing of the Separation Agreement. The total aggregate grant date fair value of the forfeited RSUs and PRSUs is $5,161,310. Had the total aggregate fair value of the forfeited RSUs and PRSUs been deducted, the amount included in the table for stock awards would have been $2,313,482.
4340

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
TABLE
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192022
Name
Grant
Date (1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or
Stock Units
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (5)
Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards
Named Executive Officer(1)
Grant
Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards (2)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number
of Shares of Stock or Stock Units
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units (#) (3)
Aggregate
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards (#)
Threshold
(2)
Target
(3)
Maximum
(4)
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Target ($)
Maximum ($)
Threshold (#)
Target (#)
Maximum (#)
Alexander M. Davern
Eric H. Starkloff
Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
$775,754
$1,551,508
Executive Incentive Program (EIP)
$992,250
$1,984,5000
Annual Company Performance Bonus Program (CPB)
2020 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/19/2022
56,351
$2,289,541
2015 Incentive Plan - 2019 RSU Grant
2/1/2019
53,000
$2,343,660
2020 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/19/2022
42,263
84,526
169,052
4,976,891
2015 Incentive Plan - 2019 PRSU Grant
2/1/2019
26,500
53,000
106,000
53,000
2,997,309
Karen M. Rapp
RSU Modification (6)
52,108
2,133,823
Executive Incentive Program (EIP)
$500,000
$1,000,000
Eric H. Starkloff
2020 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/18/2022
14,091
587,877
Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
385,875
771,750
2020 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/18/2022
10,568
21,136
42,272
1,277,883
Annual Company Performance Bonus Program (CPB)
Jason E. Green
2015 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/22/2019
16,625
762,589
Executive Incentive Program (EIP) (4)
$595,000
$1,190,000
2015 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/22/2019
8,312.5
16,625
33,250
16,625
975,274
2020 Incentive Plan – RSUs (5)
1/18/2022
15,969
666,227
Karen M. Rapp
2020 Incentive Plan – PRSUs (5)
1/18/2022
11,977
23,954
47,908
1,448,259
Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
206,719
392,766
Scott A. Rust
Annual Company Performance Bonus Program (CPB)
Executive Incentive Program (EIP)
$425,000
$850,000
2015 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/22/2019
13,006
596,585
2020 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/18/2022
10,333
431,093
2015 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/22/2019
6,503
13,006
26,012
13,006
762,972
2020 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/18/2022
7,750
15,500
31,000
937,130
Scott A. Rust
Ritu Favre
Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
154,000
308,000
Executive Incentive Program (EIP)
$450,000
$900,000
Annual Company Performance Bonus Program (CPB)
2020 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/18/2022
13,151
548,660
2015 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/22/2019
8,482
389,069
2020 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/18/2022
9,864
19,727
39,454
1,192,694
2015 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/22/2019
4,241
8,482
16,964
8,482
497,580
John C. Roiko
Annual Incentive Program (AIP)
87,000
165,300
Annual Company Performance Bonus Program (CPB)
2015 Incentive Plan - RSUs
1/22/2019
1,696
77,796
2015 Incentive Plan - PRSUs
1/22/2019
848
1,696
3,392
1,696
99,493
(1)

In accordance with Item 402(d)(2)(ii) of Regulation S-K, only grant datesThe table shows information regarding the incentive compensation awards granted to the Named Executive Officers for equity-based awards are reported in this table.2022
(2)

The AIPRepresents the range of possible cash payouts under the EIP. Cash payouts are on a linear slope. Cash payouts are capped at the maximum of 200% and the CPB did not set a threshold amount. Seecan be as low as zero. Actual cash payouts are based on attainment of pre-established corporate financial and operational objectives, as described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis – Executive Compensation Program” above. There is no threshold level of performance for a descriptionthe EIP. The amounts shown in the “maximum” column are payouts at 200%, which is the maximum possible payout. The actual amounts awarded to our NEOs under the EIP for 2022 are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of these programs.the Executive Compensation – Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2022.
(3)
The AIP and the CPB do not set target amounts. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a further description of these programs. In accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 402(d) of Regulation S-K, the amounts included under the “Target” column represent the amounts earned in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 by the named executive officer under the AIP and the CPB, as applicable.
(4)
The CPB does not set maximum amounts. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a further description of this program. The amounts set forth in the table above represent the maximum amounts that were achievable under the AIP for 2019.
(5)

For 2019,2022, the RSU awards granted to the Named Executive Officer RSU grants hadOfficers have three-year annual vesting with a vesting commencement date of May 1, 2019.2022.
(6)
(4)
We granted these RSUsMr. Green departed from the Company effective December 31, 2022. Pursuant to the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, Mr. Davern under our equity incentive plans between 2011 and 2019. Their vesting is expectedGreen received a lump sum payment in the amount of $595,000, representing his target EIP award, less applicable withholdings, paid at the same time the EIP bonus was paid to be accelerated upon signingother senior executives of the Company.
(5)
Pursuant to the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, in connectionthe portion of the 2022 RSU award that would have vested had Mr. Green remained employed through December 31, 2023 (representing 5,323 units) were accelerated and vested upon his departure on December 31, 2022. The remaining portions of the 2022 RSU with vesting dates after December 31, 2023 (representing 10,646 units) were forfeited upon his departure on December 31, 2022. Additionally, Mr. Davern’s Transition Agreement, as described in Note (5) to the Summary Compensation Table. The Transition AgreementGreen’s 2022 PRSU award (representing 23,954 units) was effective as of October 28, 2019. The amount shown in the “Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards” column represents the incremental change in the grant date fair value under FASB ASC Topic 718 that resulted from the acceleration of vesting.forfeited upon his departure on December 31, 2022.
Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table Discussion
The terms of each Named Executive Officer’s employment include severance payments and benefits and payments and benefits that may be triggered by a change in control of the Company. See the “Employment Arrangements and Post-Employment Compensation” above and “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below for more detailed discussion of such arrangements.
We have not repriced or made any material modifications to any equity-based awards to our Named Executive Officers.
4441

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table Discussion
The level of salary and bonus in proportion to total compensation ranged from approximately 12% to 57% for each of the Named Executive Officers in 2019.
The terms of Mr. Davern’s and Mr. Starkloff’s employment include severance payments and payments that may be triggered by a change in control of NI. None of NI’s other employees have employment agreements, severance payment arrangements or other payment arrangements that would be triggered by a merger or other change in control of NI. However, the terms of Mr. Rust’s employment provide for the acceleration of certain restricted stock units in the event of his termination under certain circumstances. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” for a more detailed discussion of such arrangements.
NI has not repriced or made any material modifications to any equity-based awards to its Named Executive Officers.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 20192022 YEAR-END TABLE*
 
Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer
Number of
shares or
units of
stock that
have not
vested (#) (1)
Market value
of shares or
units of stock
that
have not
vested ($) (2)
Equity
Incentive plan
awards;
number of
unearned
shares, units
or other rights
that have not
vested (#) (3)
Equity
Incentive plan
awards:
market or
payout value
of unearned
shares, units
or other rights
that have not
vested ($) (4)
Alexander M. Davern
163,624
$6,927,840
53,000
$1,862,228
Eric H. Starkloff
113,423
4,802,330
16,625
605,938
Karen M. Rapp
38,006
1,609,174
13,006
474,035
Scott A. Rust
55,589
2,353,638
8,482
309,147
John C. Roiko
13,875
587,468
1,696
61,815
The following table provides information regarding stock and equity incentive plan awards for each Named Executive Officer that, as of December 31, 2022, had not vested:
Named Executive Officer
Stock Awards
Type of
Award (1)
Grant
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested ($) (2)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#) (3)
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested ($) (2)
Eric H. Starkloff
RSU
1/19/22
56,351
2,079,352
RSU
2/17/21
29,982
1,106,336
RSU
4/29/2020
8,490
313,281
RSU
2/1/2020
25,000
922,500
RSU
4/26/2016
7,031
259,444
RSU
4/21/2015
6,015
221,954
RSU
4/22/2014
1,919
70,811
RSU
4/23/2013
192
7,085
PRSU
1/19/2022
84,526
3,119,009
PRSU
2/17/2021
67,461
2,489,311
Karen M. Rapp
RSU
1/18/2022
14,091
519,958
RSU
4/20/2021
13,850
511,065
RSU
1/19/2021
14,028
517,633
RSU
2/19/2020
5,219
192,581
PRSU
1/18/2022
21,136
779,918
PRSU
1/19/2021
21,043
776,487
Scott A. Rust
RSU
1/18/2022
10,333
381,288
RSU
1/19/2021
5,845
215,681
RSU
2/19/2020
2,982
110,036
RSU
4/26/2016
4,217
155,607
RSU
4/21/2015
3,610
133,209
RSU
4/22/2014
640
23,616
RSU
4/23/2013
116
4,280
PRSU
1/18/2022
15,500
571,950
PRSU
1/19/2021
8,768
323,539
Ritu Favre
RSU
1/18/2022
13,151
485,272
RSU
1/19/2021
9,352
345,089
RSU
4/28/2020
6,398
236,086
RSU
10/22/2019
3,000
110,700
PRSU
1/18/2022
19,727
727,926
PRSU
1/19/2021
14,029
517,670
*
Information regarding the PRSUs granted to Mr. Starkloff, Ms. Rapp, and Mr. Rust on January 1, 2020, which vested on December 31, 2022, is not included in the table.
Information regarding the RSUs and PRSUs previously granted to Mr. Green was not included in the table. As previously noted, pursuant to the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, the portion of the RSU awards that would have vested had Mr. Green remained employed through December 31, 2023, (representing 22,582 units), were accelerated and vested upon his departure on December 31, 2022. The remaining portion of the RSU awards granted to Mr. Green with vesting dates after December 31, 2023 (representing 20,941 units) were forfeited upon his departure on December 31, 2022. Additionally, the PRSUs granted to Mr. Green that were scheduled to vest after December 31, 2022 (such as the PRSUs granted in 2021 and 2022) (representing 42,659 units), were forfeited upon his departure.
(1)

Reflects RSUs granted. The RSUs were granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan, 2015 Incentive Plan, and 20152020 Incentive Plan. RSUs granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan and 2015 Incentive Plan prior to April 2016 vest as to 1/10th of the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date, subject to acceleration of vesting in the event that NI achieveswe achieve certain financial performance goals. The maximum amount of vesting acceleration is an additional 10% of the award per year. For grants made
42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

award per year. For awards granted pursuant to the 2010 Incentive Plan prior to April 2016, the number of RSUs that can have vesting acceleration each year is determined based upon the extent to which we attain a 40% year over year Revenue Growth and 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percentage of revenue. Specifically, if we achieve a 40% year over year Revenue Growth and a 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percentage of revenue, then 10% of the total number of RSUs subject to the award will accelerate. For awards granted pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Plan prior to April 2016, the number of RSUs that can have vesting acceleration each year is determined based upon the extent to which we attain 20% year over year Revenue Growth and 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percentage of revenue. Specifically, if we achieve a 20% year-over-year Revenue Growth and a 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percentage of revenue, then 10% of the total number of RSUs subject to the award accelerates. The earliest an award eligible for acceleration may fully vest is in five years. RSUs granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan and 2015 Incentive Plan prior to April 2016 have a vesting term of ten years. RSUs granted pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Plan from April 2016 to April 2018 vest as to 25% of the units subject to the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. In 2019, RSUs for our Named Executive Officers at that time were granted under the 2015 Incentive Plan and vest as to 1/3rd of the units subject to the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. For Mr. Green, RSUs granted in 2019 were granted under the 2015 Incentive Plan and vest as to 1/4th of the units subject to the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. RSUs granted in 2020 were granted pursuant to the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan and vest as to 1/3rd of the units subject to the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. RSUs granted in 2021 (other than the Rapp April 2021 Award) were granted pursuant to the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and vest as to 1/3rd of the units subject to the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. In April 2021, Ms. Rapp received 27,700 RSUs granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan, which vest as to 1/2 of the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. RSUs granted in 2022 were granted pursuant to the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan and vest as to 1/3rd of the RSUs on each anniversary of the vesting commencement date. RSUs are subject to the continued service of the Named Executive Officer on each such vesting date.
PRSUs granted in 2021 and 2022 were granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan, while PRSUs granted in 2020 were granted under the 2015 Incentive Plan. Outstanding PRSU awards may be earned and eligible for vesting in a single installment following the end of the applicable three-year performance period from the beginning of the performance period starting on January 1.
43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table (part of note 1), sets forth the grant date and vesting commencement date or performance period commencement date for the unvested stock awards listed in the table above.
Named Executive Officer
Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
Grant Date
Vesting
Commencement
Date /
Performance Period
Commencement Date
Eric H. Starkloff
56,351
1/19/22
5/2/2022
29,982
2/17/2021
5/1/2021
8,490
4/29/2020
5/1/2020
25,000
2/1/2020
2/1/2020
7,031
4/26/2016
5/1/2016
6,015
4/21/2015
��
5/1/2015
1,919
4/22/2014
5/1/2014
192
4/23/2013
5/1/2013
84,526
1/19/2022
1/1/2022
67,461
2/17/2021
1/1/2021
Karen M. Rapp
14,091
1/18/2022
5/2/2022
13,850
4/20/2021
2/28/2021
14,028
1/19/2021
5/1/2021
5,219
2/19/2020
5/1/2020
21,136
1/18/2022
1/1/2022
21,043
1/19/2021
1/1/2021
Scott A. Rust
10,333
1/18/2022
5/2/2022
5,845
1/19/2021
5/1/2021
2,982
2/19/2020
5/1/2020
4,217
4/26/2016
5/1/2016
3,610
4/21/2015
5/1/2015
640
4/22/2014
5/1/2014
116
4/23/2013
5/1/2013
15,500
1/18/2022
1/1/2022
8,768
1/19/2021
1/1/2021
Ritu Favre
13,151
1/18/2022
5/2/2022
9,352
1/19/2021
5/1/2021
6,398
4/28/2020
5/1/2020
3,000
10/22/2019
5/1/2019
19,727
1/18/2022
1/1/2022
14,029
1/19/2021
1/1/2021
(2)
Calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs that can have vesting acceleration each year is determined based upon the extent to which NI attains 40% year over year revenue growth and 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percent of revenue. Specifically, if NI achieves 40% year over year revenue growth and 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percent of revenue, then 10% of the total number of RSUsunits subject to the award shall accelerate.RSUs by $36.90, the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2022.
(3)
Reflects PRSUs granted at target performance level. The PRSUs are reported at the target level because we are required by SEC rules to compare our performance through 2022 under the PRSU awards against the threshold, target and maximum performance levels for the grant and report the applicable potential share number. If the performance is between levels, we are required to report the potential payout at the next highest level. For grants made pursuant toexample, if performance through the 2015 Incentive Plan prior to April 2016,previous year exceeded target, even by only a modest amount, and even if it is unlikely that we will achieve the number of RSUsresults that can have vesting acceleration each year is determined based uponwould dictate the extent to which NI attains 20% year over year revenue growth and 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percent of revenue. Specifically, if NI achieves 20% year-over-year revenue growth and 18% non-GAAP operating profit as a percent of revenue, then 10%payment of the total numbermaximum amount, we are required by SEC rules to report the maximum potential payouts. For the first year of RSUs subjectthe 2022-2024 and the first two years of the 2021-2023 performance period, we tracked between the threshold and target levels of performance against the PRSU performance goals on a combined basis and have accordingly reported the PRSUs at the target award levels.
44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCK VESTED
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022 TABLE*
Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
Value
Realized on
Vesting
Eric H. Starkloff
25,000
$1,030,500 (1)
45,487
1,643,900 (2)
89,419
3,299,561 (5)
Karen M. Rapp
21,569
779,504 (2)
13,850
556,632 (3)
13,934
514,165 (5)
Jason E. Green
22,962
829,847 (2)
9,953
367,266 (5)
22,582
833,276 (6)
Scott A. Rust
18,996
686,515 (2)
7,962
293,798 (5)
Ritu Favre
10,876
393,059 (2)
2,860
109,195 (4)
*
Includes PRSUs granted to the award shall accelerate. Mr. Starkloff, Ms. Rapp, Mr. Green and Mr. Rust in January or February 2020, all of which vested on December 31, 2022. We do not grant stock options.
(1)
The earliest an award eligible for acceleration may fully vest is in five years. RSUs granted under the 2010 Incentive Plan and 2015 Incentive Plan prior to April 2016 have a vesting term of ten years. RSUs granted under the 2015 Incentive Plan from April 2016 to April 2018 vest as to 25%value of the RSUs on each anniversarywas calculated by using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately preceding the vesting commencement date. In October 2018, Mr. Starkloff received a 25,000 RSU award that will vest 100% on the anniversarydate of the vesting commencement date. In January 2019 and thereafter RSUs vest as to 1/3rdFebruary 1, 2022, which was $41.22 per share.
(2)
The value of the RSUs on each anniversarywas calculated by using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately preceding the vesting date of May 2, 2022, which was $36.14 per share.
(3)
The value of the RSUs was calculated by using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately preceding the vesting commencement date. These RSUs are subject to the continued servicedate of February 28, 2022, which was $40.19 per share.
(4)
The value of the Named Executive Officer on each suchRSUs was calculated by using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately preceding the vesting date. The vesting commencement dates for these awards are set forth in the table below.date of November 1, 2022, which was $38.18 per share.
(5)
The value of the PRSUs was calculated by using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately preceding the vesting date of December 31, 2022, which was $36.90 per share.
(6)
The value of the RSUs was calculated by using the closing price of our common stock for the day immediately preceding the vesting date of December 31, 2022, which was $36.90 per share.
Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not maintain any pension plans, non-qualified defined contribution plans, or non-qualified deferred compensation plans.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Termination and Change in Control Severance Arrangements with our Named Executive Officers
Our employment arrangements with each of Mr. Starkloff, Ms. Rapp, Mr. Green, Ms. Favre, and Mr. Rust, summarized below, include severance or other payment arrangements that would be triggered by a termination of employment or change in control of the Company on December 31, 2022.
45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Arrangements with Mr. Starkloff:
On October 28, 2019, we entered into the Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Starkloff, pursuant to which Mr. Starkloff was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, effective February 1, 2020 (the “Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement”).
In the event of an involuntary termination of Mr. Starkloff’s employment by the Company or a successor without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement), subject to him executing and not revoking a release of claims in favor of the Company and meeting other requirements in the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. Starkloff would be entitled to receive the following (the “Starkloff Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements”):
(i)
Namedcontinuing severance pay at a rate equal to 100% of his annual base salary, as then in effect, for a period of 18 months from the date of such termination of employment, paid in accordance with our normal payroll practices (but if such a termination occurs within the period beginning three months prior to a Change in Control (as defined in the Starkloff Executive Officer
Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested
Grant Date
Vesting
Commencement
Date
Alexander M. Davern
53,000
2/1/2019
5/1/2019
33,750
4/25/2018
5/1/2018
25,000
4/25/2017
5/1/2017
1/24/2017
12/15/2017
16,295
4/26/2016
5/1/2016
14,397
4/21/2015
5/1/2015
6,948
4/22/2014
5/1/2014
5,415
4/23/2013
5/1/2013
6,127
4/18/2012
5/1/2012
2,692
4/20/2011
5/1/2011
Eric H. Starkloff
16,625
1/22/2019
5/1/2019
25,000
10/23/2018
5/1/2019
16,305
4/25/2018
5/1/2018
12,500
4/25/2017
5/1/2017
16,295
4/26/2016
5/1/2016
14,397
4/21/2015
5/1/2015
6,948
4/22/2014
5/1/2014
2,707
4/23/2013
5/1/2013
1,838
4/18/2012
5/1/2012
808
4/20/2011
5/1/2011
Karen M. Rapp
13,006
1/22/2019
5/1/2019
15,000
4/25/2018
5/1/2018
10,000
7/25/2017
5/1/2017
Scott A. Rust
8,482
1/22/2019
5/1/2019
12,228
4/25/2018
5/1/2018
10,000
4/25/2017
5/1/2017
9,776
4/26/2016
5/1/2016
8,639
4/21/2015
5/1/2015
2,316
4/22/2014
5/1/2014
1,625
4/23/2013
5/1/2013
1,715
4/18/2012
5/1/2012
808
4/20/2011
5/1/2011
John C. Roiko
1,696
1/22/2019
5/1/2019
2,283
4/25/2018
5/1/2018
2,000
4/25/2017
5/1/2017
2,608
4/26/2016
5/1/2016
2,303
4/21/2015
5/1/2015
867
4/23/2013
5/1/2013
1,471
4/18/2012
5/1/2012
647
4/20/2011
5/1/2011
Employment Agreement) and ending 12 months following a Change in Control, then he would be entitled to receive the severance amount in a lump sum on the 60th day following the termination date);
(2)
(ii)
Calculated by multiplyingto the numberextent not already earned and accrued, a lump sum equivalent to 100% of shareshis EIP bonus as in effect at the time of RSUs by $42.34, the closing price ofapplicable termination or resignation, paid at such time annual bonuses are paid to our Common Stock on December 31, 2019.other senior executives;
(3)
(iii)
Reflects PRSU awards granted. The PRSU awards were made underaccelerated vesting of Mr. Starkloff’s outstanding time-based RSUs that would have vested had he remained employed by the 2015 Incentive Plan. As previously noted, Mr. Davern's PRSUs are forfeited as ofCompany or a successor for 12 months following the Termination Date pursuanttermination date, and subject to the Transition Agreement.any required approval by our Board; and
(4)
(iv)
The fair valuesprovided he timely elects healthcare continuation coverage under COBRA, reimbursement of PRSUs are asMr. Starkloff for, or direct payment of, on December 31, 2019 and estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The determinationhis COBRA premiums (at the coverage level in effect immediately prior to his termination) until the earlier of fair value of18 months following the PRSUs is affected by our stock price and a number of assumptions including the expected volatility, expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate. Our expected volatility attermination date or the date Mr. Starkloff becomes covered under similar plans. If we determine, in our sole discretion, that we cannot provide the foregoing benefit related to COBRA premiums without potentially violating or being subject to an excise tax under applicable law, we would instead provide a taxable monthly payment of grant was based onan equivalent amount, which would be made regardless of whether Mr. Starkloff elects COBRA, and continue until the historical volatilitiesearlier of our stock and18 months following termination or the companies included in the Index over the performance period. As previously noted,date Mr. Davern's PRSUs are forfeited as of the Termination Date pursuant to the Transition Agreement.Starkloff becomes covered under similar plans.
If Mr. Starkloff’s employment had been terminated by the Company or a successor without Cause or Mr. Starkloff resigned for Good Reason, in either case on December 31, 2022, the Starkloff Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements would have had an estimated value of $4,352,305 (including $2,831,854, which is the estimated value of accelerated time-based RSUs based upon the closing market price of our common stock on December 31, 2022, which was $36.90 per share (the “Applicable Price”).
For avoidance of doubt, Mr. Starkloff’s equity awards remain subject to the Change in Control vesting or other treatment as provided for pursuant to the terms of our equity plan and his equity award agreements, as applicable, notwithstanding his eligibility to receive vesting acceleration set forth in (iii) above. These entitlements are described below under “—Equity Awards of Named Executive Officers.
If a Change in Control had occurred as of December 31, 2022, in connection with a termination of employment that resulted in acceleration under the terms of our equity incentive plans and equity award agreements of all unvested equity awards outstanding as of such date, instead of the value of the equity awards included in the termination benefits above, the value of equity awards at the Applicable Price included with such termination benefits would be $10,589,082.
Arrangements with Ms. Rapp:
On February 22, 2021, we entered into the Executive Employment Agreement with Ms. Rapp (the “Rapp Executive Employment Agreement”) who resigned as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2023 and transitioned to a strategic advisor role. Pursuant to the Rapp Executive Employment Agreement, in the event of involuntary termination of Ms. Rapp’s employment by the Company or a successor without Cause or
46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCK VESTED
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019resignation for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the Rapp Executive Employment Agreement), subject to her executing and not revoking a release of claims in favor of the Company and meeting other requirements in the Rapp Executive Employment Agreement, Ms. Rapp would have been entitled to receive the following (the “Rapp Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements”):
 
Stock Awards
Named Executive Officer
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
Value
Realized on
Vesting
Alexander M. Davern (1)
38,831
$1,828,940
Alexander M. Davern (2)
50,000
2,127,500
Eric H. Starkloff (1)
21,946
1,033,657
Karen M. Rapp (1)
10,000
471,000
Scott A. Rust (1)
15,403
725,481
John C. Roiko (1)
4,356
205,168
(1)
(i)
Calculated by usingcontinuing severance pay at a rate equal to 100% of her annual base salary for a period of 12 months from the NI common stock closing price for the day immediately preceding the vesting date of May 1, 2019, which was $47.10 per share.termination of employment (but if such a termination occurs within the period beginning three months prior to a Change in Control (as defined in the Rapp Executive Employment Agreement) and ending 12 months following a Change in Control, then she would have been entitled to receive the severance amount in a lump sum on the 60th day following the termination date);
(2)
(ii)
Calculatedto the extent not already earned and accrued, a lump sum equivalent to 100% of her EIP bonus as in effect at the time of the applicable termination or resignation, paid at such time annual bonuses are paid to our other senior executives;
(iii)
accelerated vesting of her outstanding time-based RSUs that would have vested had she remained employed by using the NI common stock closing priceCompany or a successor for 12 months following the daytermination date, and subject to any required approval by the Compensation Committee; and
(iv)
provided she timely elected healthcare continuation coverage under COBRA, we would have reimbursed her for, or direct payment of, her COBRA premiums (at the coverage level in effect immediately precedingprior to her termination) until the vestingearlier of 12 months following the termination date or the date she becomes covered under similar plans. If we determined in our sole discretion, that we could not provide the foregoing benefit related to COBRA premiums without potentially violating, or being subject to an excise tax under, applicable law, we instead would have provided a taxable monthly payment of December 16, 2019,an equivalent amount, which was $42.55 per share.would be made regardless of whether she elected COBRA and would continue until the earlier of 12 months following termination or the date she becomes covered under similar plans.
Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
NI does not have any pension plans, non-qualified defined contribution plansIf Ms. Rapp’s employment had been terminated by the Company or non-qualified deferred compensation plans.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Our employment arrangements with each of Mr. Davern and Mr. Starkloff, summarized below, include severance or other payment arrangements that would be triggered by a termination, merger or other change in control of NI.
Arrangements with Mr. Davern: NI entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Davern in connection with his appointment as CEO (the “Davern CEO Agreement”). Under the Davern CEO Agreement, the initial term of Mr. Davern’s employment as Chief Executive Officer extended from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019.
On October 28, 2019, NI entered into a Transition Agreement with Mr. Davern pursuant to which Mr. Davern transitioned from his service as Chief Executive Officer on January 31, 2020 into a strategic advisory role whereby he is providing certain transition and advisory services to NI through May 5, 2020 (the “Transition Period”). The Transition Agreement superseded and replaced the CEO Agreement as of October 28, 2019. During the Transition Period, if either NI terminates the employment of Mr. Davernsuccessor without Cause (as definedor Ms. Rapp resigned for Good Reason, in the Transition Agreement) or the parties mutually agree to terminate prior to May 5, 2020, Mr. Davern will receive a lump sum equal to $267,063, reflecting any remaining base salary that would have been received under the Transition Agreement and, provided Mr. Davern signs his Separation Agreement, the benefits offered under such Separation Agreement. If such termination occurredeither case, on December 31, 2019 and, assuming Mr. Davern2022, the Rapp Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements would have had signed his Separation Agreement on December 31, 2019, Mr. Davern’s equity awards that are subject only to service-based vesting, and scheduled to vest prior to May 5, 2021, would accelerate vesting as of the termination date for an amount equal to $4,510,269, based upon the closing market price of NI’s common stock at December 31, 2019, which was $42.34 per share (the “Applicable Price”). Mr. Davern's unvested PRSUs would be forfeited pursuant to the Transition Agreement. Mr. Davern’s health continuation coverage costs will be paid through May 31, 2021 under the Separation Agreement for aestimated value of $33,821, assuming a termination occurred as$1,840,544 (including $1,135,782, which is the estimated value of December 31, 2019. accelerated time-based RSUs at the Applicable Price).
If a Change in Control had occurred as of December 31, 20192022 in connection with a termination of employment that resulted in acceleration under the terms of our equity incentive plans and equity award agreements of all unvested equity awards outstanding as of such date, instead of the value of the equity awards included in the termination benefits above, the value of equity awards at the Applicable Price included with such termination benefits would have been $3,297,642.
In connection with Ms. Rapp’s resignation as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, we entered into the Rapp Offer Letter, which superseded and replaced the Rapp Executive Employment Agreement. Ms. Rapp did not receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with her resignation.
Arrangements with Ms. Favre:
On February 22, 2021, we entered into the Executive Employment Agreement with Ms. Favre (the “Favre Executive Employment Agreement”). In the event of involuntary termination of Ms. Favre’s employment by the Company or a successor without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the Favre Executive Employment Agreement ), subject to her executing and not revoking a release of claims in favor of the Company and meeting other requirements in the Favre Executive Employment Agreement, Ms. Favre would be as set forth underentitled to receive the “Potential Valuefollowing (the “Favre Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements”): (i) continuing severance pay at a rate equal to 100% of Equity Awards Uponher annual base salary for a period of 12 months from the date of termination of employment (but if such a termination occurs within the period beginning three months prior to a Change in Control” table below.
Arrangements with Mr. Starkloff: NI entered into an offer letter with Mr. Starkloff, dated October 23, 2018,Control (as defined in connection with his appointmentthe Favre Executive Employment Agreement) and ending 12 months following a Change in Control, then she would be entitled to receive the severance amount in a lump sum on the 60th day following the termination date); (ii) to the extent not already earned and accrued, a lump sum equivalent to 100% of her EIP bonus as President and Chief Operating Officer (the “Offer Letter”). Underin effect at the Offer Letter, Mr. Starkloff’s employment was “at-will” for no specific time period and could have been terminated by Mr. Starkloffof the applicable termination or NIresignation, which amount would be paid at anysuch time with or without cause or advance notice. In the event Mr. Starkloff’s employment was terminated by NIannual bonuses are paid
47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to our other thansenior executives of the Company; (iii) accelerated vesting of her outstanding time-based RSUs that would have vested had she remained employed by the Company or a successor for 12 months following the termination date, and subject to any required approval by the Compensation Committee; and (iv) provided she timely elects healthcare continuation coverage under COBRA, we would reimburse her for, or direct payment of, her COBRA premiums (at the coverage level in effect immediately prior to her termination) until the earlier of 12 months following the termination date or the date she becomes covered under similar plans. If we determine in our sole discretion, that we cannot provide the foregoing benefit related to COBRA premiums without potentially violating, or being subject to an excise tax under, applicable law, we would instead provide a taxable monthly payment of an equivalent amount, which would be made regardless of whether she elects COBRA and continue until the earlier of 12 months following termination or the date she becomes covered under similar plans.
If Ms. Favre’s employment had been terminated by the Company or a successor without Cause or Disability (eachMs. Favre resigned for Good Reason, in either case on December 31, 2022, pursuant to the Favre Executive Employment Agreement, the Favre Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements would have had an estimated value of $1,200,440 (including $563,057, which is the estimated value of accelerated time-based RSUs at the Applicable Price).
If a Change in Control had occurred as definedof December 31, 2022 in connection with a termination of employment that resulted in acceleration under the terms of our equity incentive plans and equity award agreements of all unvested equity awards outstanding as of such date, instead of the value of the equity awards included in the Offer Letter)termination benefits above, the value of equity awards at the Applicable Price included with such termination benefits would be $2,422,743.
Arrangements with Mr. Rust:
On December 15, 2022, we entered into the Rust Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Rust in connection with his new role of Executive Vice President, Global Operations of the Company, effective December 15, 2022. The Rust Executive Employment Agreement replaced and superseded Mr. Rust’s prior Executive Employment Agreement dated September 28, 2021, effective October 1, 2021. In the event of involuntary termination of Mr. Rust’s employment by the Company or death,a successor without Cause or by Mr. Starkloffresignation for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the Offer Letter),Rust Executive Employment Agreement ), subject to himhis executing and not revoking a release of claims in favor of NIthe Company and meeting other requirements in the Offer Letter,Rust Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. StarkloffRust would have beenbe entitled to receive the following (the “Rust Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements”): (i) continuing severance pay at a cash payment (the “Starkloff COO Severance Payment”), which is equal to the sum of (i) a lump-sum paymentrate equal to 100% of his annual base salary for a period of 12 months from the date of termination of employment (but if such a termination occurs within the period beginning three months prior to a Change in Control (as defined in the Rust Executive Employment Agreement) and ending 12 months following a Change in Control, then he would be entitled to receive the severance amount in a lump sum on the 60th day following the termination date); (ii) to the extent not already earned and accrued, a lump sum equivalent to 100% of his EIP bonus as in effect onat the time of the applicable termination or resignation, which amount would be paid at such time annual bonuses are paid to other senior executives of the Company; (iii) accelerated vesting of his outstanding time-based RSUs that would have vested had he remained employed by the Company or a successor for 12 months following the termination date, (ii) a lump-sum payment equaland subject to (A)any required approval by the AIP bonus at target level for the year of termination, multiplied by (B) the average of actual AIP performance percentage over the previous three completed performance years (determined based on the actual payout as a percentage of the target AIP bonus for each such year),Compensation Committee; and (iii) payment of monthly premiums for continued medical, dental and vision insurance(iv) provided he timely elects healthcare continuation coverage under COBRA, (if Mr. Starkloff had timely electedwe would reimburse him for, or direct payment of, his COBRA coverage)premiums (at the coverage level in effect immediately prior to his termination) until the earlier of 12 months following the termination date or the date he becomes covered under similar plans. If we determine in our sole discretion, that we cannot provide the foregoing benefit related to COBRA premiums without potentially violating, or being subject to an excise tax under, applicable law, we would instead provide a taxable monthly payment of an equivalent amount, inwhich would be made regardless of whether he elects COBRA and continue until the event providing such payment would violate any applicable lawearlier of 12 months following termination or result in an excise tax to the company,date he becomes covered under similar plans.
If Mr. Rust’s employment had been terminated by the Company or a successor without Cause or Mr. Rust resigned for Good Reason, in either case until the earliest of (A) the date that was twelve months following the Termination Date, (B) the date when Mr. Starkloff was offered substantially equivalent health insurance coverage in connection with new employment, or (C) the date upon which Mr. Starkloff ceased to be eligible for coverage under COBRA or other applicable law or policy governing such coverage. In addition, Mr. Starkloff would have received accelerated vesting of the number of outstanding RSUs, excluding the Promotion RSUs (as defined in the Offer Letter) which would not have been subject to acceleration under this paragraph, that would have vested if Mr. Starkloff had remained employed by the company for twelve (12) months following the termination date. A Starkloff COO Severance Payment of $814,466 would have been payable to Mr. Starkloff if a termination event had occurred on December 31, 2019. If such termination event2022, the Rust Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements would have had occurred on December 31, 2019, thean estimated value of such$1,140,034 (including $536,046, which is the estimated value of accelerated time-based RSUs would have been $1,099,866, based uponat the Applicable Price. Price).
If a Change in Control had occurred as of December 31, 20192022 in connection with a termination that resulted in acceleration under the terms of our equity incentive plans and equity award agreements of all unvested equity awards outstanding as of such date, instead of the value of the equity awards included in the termination benefits above, the value of equity awards at the Applicable Price included with such termination benefits would be as set forth under the “Potential Value of Equity Awards Upon a Change in Control” table below.$1,919,206.
48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Arrangements with Mr. Green:
On October 28, 2019, NIFebruary 22, 2021, we entered into the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Starkloff, pursuantGreen (the “Green Executive Employment Agreement”) who departed, by mutual agreement of Mr. Green and the Company, as the Company’s Chief Revenue Officer and Executive Vice President, effective December 31, 2022. Pursuant to which Mr. Starkloff was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer, effective February 1, 2020. The Starkloffthe Green Executive Employment Agreement, initially entitled Mr. Starkloff to participate in the AIP and the CPB with an AIP targetevent of 110% of his base salary and an CPB target of 25% of his base salary. On February 3, 2020, the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement was amended to reflect the implementation of the EIP. Pursuant to the amendment, in lieuinvoluntary termination of Mr. Starkloff’s participation inGreen’s employment by the AIP and CPB, Mr. Starkloff will have an annual EIP target of 135% of his base salary. In the event Mr. Starkloff’s employment is terminated either by NICompany or a successor without Cause or Mr. Starkloff resignsresignation for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in the Green Executive Employment Agreement),Agreement ), subject to himhis executing and not revoking a release of claims in favor of NI and meeting other requirements in the StarkloffGreen Executive Employment Agreement, Mr. Starkloff will beGreen would have been entitled to receive the following (the “Starkloff“Green Employment Agreement Severance Payment”Entitlements”): (i) continuing severance pay at a rate equal to one-hundred percent (100%)100% of his Base Salary,base salary, as then in effect, (less applicable withholding), for a period of eighteen (18)12 months from the date of termination (but if such a termination paidoccurs in accordance with NI’s normal payroll practices;a period beginning 3 months prior to a Change in Control (as defined in his employment agreement) and ending 12 months following a Change in Control, then he would be entitled to receive the severance amount in a lump sum in 60 days); (ii) to the extent not already earned and accrued, a lump sum equivalent to one hundred percent (100%)100% of his EIP bonus as in effect at the time of the applicable termination or resignation, less applicable withholding, which amount shall be paid at such time annual bonuses are paid to other senior executives of NI (for avoidance of doubt in no case would Mr. Starkloff be entitled to more than one EIP bonus payment under the terms of this provision);resignation; (iii) accelerated vesting of Mr. Starkloff’shis outstanding service-based RSUs that would have vested had he remained employed by NI for twelve (12)12 months following the termination date, and subject to any required approval by the Board;Compensation Committee; and (iv) provided he timely elects healthcare continuation coverage under COBRA, NI reimbursement of Mr. Starkloffwe will reimburse him for, or direct payment of, his COBRA premiums (at the coverage level in effect immediately prior to his termination) until the earlier of eighteen (18)12 months following the termination date or the date Mr. Starkloffhe becomes covered under similar plans. If NI determines,we determined in itsour sole discretion, that itwe cannot provide the foregoing benefit related to COBRA premiums without potentially violating, or being subject to an excise tax under, applicable law, NI willwe would have instead provideprovided a taxable monthly payment of an equivalent amount, which willwould be made regardless of whether Mr. Starkloffhe elects COBRA and continue until the earlier of eighteen (18)12 months following termination or the date Mr. Starkloffthe executive becomes covered under similar plans. If
In connection with Mr. Green’s departure from the StarkloffCompany as our Chief Revenue Officer and Executive EmploymentVice President, effective December 31, 2022, we entered into (i) the Transition Agreement had been in effectand Release with Mr. Green on November 14, 2022, which became effective on November 22, 2022 (the “Transition Agreement”), and (ii) the Separation Agreement and Release with Mr. Green, attached as an exhibit to the Transition Agreement, on December 23, 2022, which became effective on December 31, 2019,2022 (the “Separation Agreement,” and together with the Starkloff EmploymentTransition Agreement, Severance Payment would have been $4,184,576 (including the value of accelerated RSUs at“Green Transition and Separation Agreement”). The Green Transition and Separation Agreement superseded and replaced the Applicable Price of $2,158,366). Notwithstanding any contrary provision, if a termination described in the Starkloff Executive Employment Agreement occurs within the period beginning three months prior to a Change in Control (as such term is defined in the StarkloffGreen Executive Employment Agreement as amended) and ending twelve (12) months following a Change in Control, thenof November 22, 2022.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Starkloff will beGreen received (i) the Green Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements to which he was entitled pursuant to receive the same severance described in the preceding paragraph except the severance amount set forth
48
���

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in (i) above will be paid in a lump-sum on the sixtieth (60th) day following the termination date. For avoidanceSection 6(a) (Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason) of doubt, Mr. Starkloff’s equity awards will remainhis existing Green Executive Employment Agreement (effective February 22, 2021) subject to Mr. Green agreeing to a release of claims in favor of the Change in Control vesting or other treatment as provided for pursuantCompany and reaffirming his commitment to comply with his existing non-compete and no solicitation covenants and confidentiality obligations and (ii) a Company-owned laptop. Pursuant to the termsTransition Agreement, Mr. Green received a lump sum payment of NI’s equity plan$10,000 for executive transition services (paid in December 2022) subject to Mr. Green agreeing to a release of claims in favor of the Company and reaffirming his equity award agreements, as applicable, notwithstandingcommitment to comply with his eligibilityexisting non-compete and no solicitation covenants and confidentiality obligations. See the section entitled “Payments and Benefits Provided to receive vesting acceleration set forth in (iii) above. If a Change in Control had occurred as of December 31, 2019Mr. Green In Connection with his Departure” below for more information about his severance payments and benefits received in connection with a termination that resulted inhis departure.
Equity Awards of Named Executive Officers
Our Named Executive Officers may benefit along with non-executive employees from acceleration provisions under the terms of our equity incentive plans2010 Incentive Plan, 2015 Incentive Plan, 2020 Incentive Plan and equity award agreements of2022 Incentive Plan that are applicable to all unvested equity awards outstanding as of such date, instead of the value of the equity awards included in the termination benefits above, the value of equity awards included with such termination benefits would be as set forth under the “Potential Value of Equity Awards Upon a Change in Control” table below.
Other arrangements: None of NI’s other executives have employment agreements, severance payment arrangements or other payment arrangements that would be triggered by a termination, merger or other change of control of NI. However, the terms of Mr. Rust’s employment provides for acceleration of certain restricted stock units in the event of his termination under certain circumstances andparticipating employees. Further, each of our Named Executive Officers also have PRSUs under our 2015 Incentive Plan, 2020 Incentive Plan, and 2022 Incentive Plan with special vesting terms upon a change of control and may benefit, along with non-executive employees, from accelerated vesting underof the terms of our 2015 Incentive Plan and 2010 Incentive Plan that are applicable to all participating employees,Company, as further described below.
Mr. Rust is a party to an Acceleration Agreement with NI. The Acceleration Agreement provides for the immediate vesting of all of Mr. Rust’s then outstanding restricted stock units in the event Mr. Rust’s employment is terminated without Cause or he resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the Acceleration Agreement), subject to him executing and not revoking a release of claims in favor of NI and meeting other requirements in the Acceleration Agreement. If a termination event had occurred on December 31, 2019, the value of such accelerated restricted stock units would have been $2,712,766, based upon the Applicable Price.
Additionally, NI’s Named Executive Officers may benefit along with non-executive employees of NI from acceleration provisions under NI’s equity incentive plans. The 2010 Incentive Plan provides for acceleration of all unvested restricted stock units in the event of a change of control of NI or the award recipient’s death or disability (each, an “acceleration event”).Company. A change of control under the 2010 Incentive Plan means any of the following events:
any person becomes the beneficial owner of fifty percent (50%)50% or more of the total voting power represented by NI’sour outstanding voting securities;
existing members of NI’sour Board of Directors cease to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors;Board;
49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a public announcement is made of a tender or exchange offer for fifty percent (50%)50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of NI and it is not opposed by NI’s Board of Directors;our Board;
theour stockholders of NI approve a merger or consolidation of NI with any other corporation or partnership, unless NIour stockholders prior to such transaction will hold a majority of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity; or
theour stockholders of NI approve a plan of complete liquidation of NI or an agreement for the sale or disposition by NI of all or substantially all of NI’sour assets.
In the case of unvested restricted stock units under the 2010 Incentive Plan, 100% of the restricted stock units that have not vested as of the date of death or disability will immediately vest.vest (provided that such death or disability occurs prior to the 15th anniversary of the vesting commencement date).
Pursuant to the 2015 Incentive Plan, 2020 Incentive Plan and 2022 Incentive Plan, in the event of a change in control of NI,the Company, awards will be treated as determined by the administrator, including that each award be assumed or substituted by the successor corporation; provided that, in the event the successor corporation does not assume or substitute awards, the restriction period of any award of restricted stock or restricted stock units shallwill immediately be accelerated, and the restrictions shall expire.will expire, and, with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met. With the exception of the two forms of award agreement under the 2015 Incentive Plan, the PRSU award agreements under the 2015 Incentive Plan, 2020 Incentive Plan and 2022 Incentive Plan provide that the number of PRSUs eligible to vest at 100% of target levels will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments following the change of control over the remainder of the original performance period, except that they will immediately vest if the PRSUs are not assumed or substituted in connection with the change in control. Following any such assumption or substitution of awards in connection with a change in control, if an employee is terminated without Cause (as defined in the 2015 Incentive Plan)applicable plan) within twenty-four (24)24 months following the change in control, then the vestingrestriction period of such employee’s awards will accelerate and theany award of restricted stock or restricted stock units will immediately become fully vested.be accelerated, and the restrictions will expire, and, with respect to the respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other terms and conditions met. In the event of a change in control involves a restructuring (as such term is defined in the plans) or occurs in connection with a series of related transactions involving a restructuring, and if the Company is not the surviving entity, and as a part of the restructuring stock, other securities, cash, or property are exchanged for shares of Company stock, then the award recipient shall be entitled to purchase or receive, as appropriate for the form of award, the number of shares, other securities, cash, or property to which that number of shares of Company stock would have been entitled in connection with such restructuring. Additionally, award agreements under the 2015 Incentive Plan, 2020 Incentive Plan and 2022 Incentive Plan provide for acceleration of all unvested time-based RSUs in the event of the award recipient’s death or disability (provided that such death or disability occurs prior the 15th anniversary of the vesting commencement date), except that both time-based RSUs and PRSUs vest under one of the 2015 Incentive Plan forms of award agreement.
A change in control under the 2015 Incentive Plan, 2020 Incentive Plan and 2022 Incentive Plan means any of the following events:
any person becomes the beneficial owner of fifty percent (50%)50% or more of the total voting power represented by NI’sour outstanding voting securities;
the sale or disposition by NIus of all or substantially all of itsour assets;
existing members of NI’sour Board of Directors cease to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors;Board; or
49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the consummation of a merger or consolidation of NIus with any other corporation, unless NIour stockholders prior to such transaction will hold at least 50% of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity.
Notwithstanding
50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Estimated Values of Termination and Change in Control Severance Payments to Named Executive Officers
The following table, footnotes and narrative set forth our payment obligations pursuant to the provisionscompensation arrangements of our NEOs, under the 2015 Incentive Plan,circumstances described below, assuming their employment was terminated on December 31, 2022. Because Mr. Green’s employment terminated on December 31, 2022, his arrangements are not discussed in this section. Mr. Green’s severance package is described below under “Payments and Benefits Provided to Mr. Green in Connection with His Departure.” Ms. Rapp did not receive any severance payments or benefits in connection with her resignation.
Named Executive Officer
Voluntary
Termination
($)(1)
Change in Control
($)(2)
Involuntary Termination
Outside of a Change in
Control ($)(3)
Involuntary Termination
in Connection with a
Change in Control
($)(4)
Death or
Disability
($)(5)
Eric H. Starkloff
10,589,082
4,352,305
12,109,533
10,589,082
Karen M. Rapp
3,297,642
1,840,544
4,002,404
3,297,642
Ritu Favre
2,422,743
1,200,440
3,060,126
2,523,194
Scott A. Rust
1,919,206
1,140,034
2,523,194
1,919,206
(1)
Voluntary Termination. The Company does not pay severance benefits upon voluntary termination.
(2)
Change in Control. The Company has not entered into any arrangements with any of its executive officers to provide “single trigger” severance payments upon a change in control. The Company’s equity incentive plans generally provide for the acceleration of vesting of awards granted under the plans upon a change in control only if the successor entity does not agree to assume or substitute for the awards. These provisions generally apply to all holders of awards under the equity incentive plans.
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate value of accelerated vesting in respect toof unvested time-based RSUs and unvested PRSUs ifheld by the NEOs (other than Mr. Green), calculated based on the Applicable Price assuming that (i) a change in control occurs before the last day of the performance period, and such PRSUs are accelerated, rather than vesting based on our TSR relative to the Index during the performance period, the number of PRSUs eligible to vest will equal 100% of the target number of PRSUs. The number of PRSUs so determined will be scheduled to vest in equal monthly installments following the change in control over the remainder of the original performance period.
Following any assumption or substitution of any equity awards, if the employment of an employee is terminated without “cause” (as defined in the 2015 Incentive Plan) within 24 months following the change in control of NI, then the vesting of such employee’s award will immediately accelerate and the restricted stock, RSUs and PRSU awards will immediately become fully vested. No PRSUs were awarded prior to 2019.
If a Change in Controltransaction had occurred as of December 31, 2019 that resulted2022, and (ii) the successor entity did not assume or substitute for the NEOs’ outstanding equity awards and their respective unvested and outstanding awards fully accelerated upon such change in control, and, with respect to awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria were deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels.
Named Executive Officer
RSUs
PRSUs
Eric H. Starkloff
$4,980,762
$5,608,320
Karen M. Rapp
1,741,237
1,556,405
Ritu Favre
1,177,147
1,245,596
Scott A. Rust
1,023,717
895,489
(3)
Involuntary Termination Outside of a Change in Control. We have entered into certain termination severance arrangements with our NEOs as described above under “—Termination and Change in Control Severance Arrangements with our Named Executive Officers.” The following table shows a breakdown of payments that would have been due to our NEOs (other than Mr. Green) if an involuntary termination outside of a change of control had occurred as of December 31, 2022.
Named Executive
Officer
Base Cash
Severance
Bonus Cash
Severance
COBRA Premiums
Accelerated RSUs
Total
Eric H. Starkloff
1,102,500
385,191
32,760
2,831,854
​4,352,305
Karen M. Rapp
500,000
194,100
10,662
1,135,782
1,840,544
Ritu Favre
450,000
174,690
12,693
563,057
1,200,440
Scott A. Rust
425,000
164,985
14,003
536,046
1,140,034
The amounts in the acceleration undertable above in the termscolumn entitled “Accelerated RSUs” represent the aggregate value of out equity incentive plans and equity award agreementsaccelerated vesting in respect of all unvested awards outstanding time-based RSUs held by the NEOs (other than Mr. Green).
(4)
Involuntary Termination in Connection with a Change in Control.
The following table shows a breakdown of payments that would have been due to our NEOs (other than Mr. Green) if an involuntary termination in connection with a change of control had occurred as of December 31,
51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2022, assuming (i) the successor entity had not assumed or substituted for outstanding equity awards in connection with such date,change in control transaction and (ii) an involuntary termination in connection with a change of control had occurred as of December 31, 2022.
Named Executive
Officer
Base Cash
Severance
Bonus Cash
Severance
COBRA
Premiums
Accelerated
RSUs
Accelerated
PRSUs
Total
Eric H. Starkloff
1,102,500
385,191
32,760
4,980,762
5,608,320
12,109,533
Karen M. Rapp
500,000
194,100
10,662
1,741,237
1,556,405
4,002,404
Ritu Favre
450,000
174,690
12,693
1,177,147
1,245,596
3,060,126
Scott A. Rust
425,000
164,985
14,003
1,023,717
895,489
2,523,194
The following table shows a breakdown of the aggregate value of such accelerated awardsvesting in respect of unvested RSUs and unvested PRSUs held by our NEOs (other than Mr. Green) that were executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2022, calculated based on the Applicable Price, assuming (i) the successor entity had assumed or substituted for outstanding equity awards in connection with such change in control transaction and (ii) an involuntary termination in connection with a change of control had occurred as of December 31, 2022.
Named Executive Officer
RSUs
PRSUs
Eric H. Starkloff
$1,909,354
$—
Karen M. Rapp
1,135,782
Ritu Favre
563,057
Scott A. Rust
536,046
(5)
Death or Disability. The Company has not entered into any arrangements with any of its executive officers to provide severance payments upon a death or disability. The 2010 Incentive Plan provides for acceleration of all unvested restricted stock units in the event of the award recipient’s death or disability. The 2022 Incentive Plan provides that vesting and other restrictions may be accelerated in the event of the award recipient’s death or disability at the plan administrator’s sole discretion. The NEO’s time-vesting RSUs provide for accelerated vesting if a termination due to death or disability occurs prior to the 15th anniversary of the vesting commencement date.
The amounts in this column represent the aggregate value of accelerated vesting in respect of unvested equity awards held by the NEOs (other than Mr. Green), calculated based on the Applicable Price assuming that a death or disability had occurred as of December 31, 2022 and the plan administrator elected to accelerate vesting of the NEOs’ awards.
Payments and Benefits Provided to Mr. Green In Connection with his Departure
Mr. Green, our Namedformer Chief Revenue Officer and Executive OfficersVice President, Portfolio Business Unit, departed from the Company, effective December 31, 2022, by mutual agreement of Mr. Green and the Company. In connection with his departure from the Company, we entered into the Green Transition and Separation Agreement, which superseded and replaced the Green Executive Employment Agreement.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, Mr. Green received the following:
The Green Employment Agreement Severance Entitlements to which he was entitled pursuant to Section 6(a) (Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason) of his existing Green Executive Employment Agreement consisting of the following:
payments of $595,000, less applicable withholding, representing 12 months of his annual base salary (paid in the form of salary continuation from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023);
a lump sum payment in the amount of $595,000, representing 100% of his annual cash incentive bonus payment, which was paid in March 2023 at the same time the EIP bonus was paid to other senior executives of the Company; and
reimbursement, or payment directly on his behalf, of COBRA premiums through December 31, 2023, or the date that he becomes eligible for coverage under a subsequent employer’s plan; and
A Company-owned laptop.
52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Mr. Green received the payment of $10,000 for executive transition services (paid as a lump sum in December 2022) as well as continued employment from November 15, 2022 to December 31, 2022.
In addition, pursuant to Separation Agreement, the portion of Mr. Green’s outstanding time-based RSU awards that would have beenvested had Mr. Green remained employed through December 31, 2023 (representing 22,582 units, which would have had a value of $833,276 at the Applicable Price) were accelerated and vested upon his departure on December 31, 2022. The remaining portions of his time-based RSU awards with vesting dates after December 31, 2023 were forfeited upon his departure on December 31, 2022. Additionally, the PRSUs that were scheduled to vest after December 31, 2022 (such as set forththe PRSUs granted in the table below:2021 and 2022) were forfeited.
Potential Value of Equity Awards Upon a Change of Control
53
Named Executive Officer
RSUs
PRSUs
Alexander M. Davern
$6,927,840
$2,244,020
Eric H. Starkloff
4,802,330
703,903
Karen M. Rapp
1,609,174
550,674
Scott A. Rust
2,353,638
359,128
John C. Roiko
587,468
71,809

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO for fiscal year 2019, Alex Davern.
For 2019, our last completed fiscal year, we have estimated the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO), was $49,581; and the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, was $8,487,974.
Based on this information, for fiscal year 2019, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of employees was 171 to 1. We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees as well as to(other than our President and CEO) and the annual total compensation of our President and CEO, who was serving in that position on December 31, 2022.
To determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows:
We selected December 6, 2017,31, 2020, the date of the most recent and validated global employee data file, as the date upon which we identified the median employee. We used the same median employee as lastused in our disclosure for fiscal year 2020 and 2021 because we believeduring fiscal year 2022 there has beenwas no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements during 2019 that we reasonably believe would significantly impact theour pay ratio disclosure.
We identified the “median employee” by taking all employees, excluding our President and CEO and the other excluded groups described below, and ranking them based on annualized U.S. dollar equivalent direct compensation, including the value of stock awards, and converting the base salary and bonus payouts in local currency utilizing the latest exchange rate table provided by our finance team.
In performing our analysis, we excluded those individuals that perform work for us but are paid by a third-party. The total number of U.S. and non-U.S. employees used for our de minimis calculation was 7,035. We then excluded employees in those countries that representedhad less than 0.5% of our total global population.75 employees. The total number of employees subject to this exclusion equaled 4.6%4.5% of our total global population, as permitted by the applicable SEC de minimis rule. The jurisdictions from which those employees are being excluded, and the approximate number of employees excluded from each jurisdiction, are as follows: Singapore, 51; Italy, 50; Mexico, 39; Ireland, 25; Belgium, 22; Brazil, 21; Philippines, 20; Russian Federation, 18; Canada, 10; Sweden, 9; Netherlands, 8; Switzerland, 7; Austria, 5; Lebanon, 34, Canada, 31, Sweden, 29, Netherlands, 27, Ireland, 24, Australia, 22, Switzerland, 22, Philippines, 20, Spain, 18, Finland, 16, Poland, 14, Belgium, 12, Israel, 11, Thailand, 11,5; Colombia, 4; Czech Republic, 10,4; Hong Kong, 10, Austria, 9,4; Thailand, 4; Denmark, 3; Poland, 3; Spain, 2; Vietnam, 2; Finland, 1; and Indonesia, 9, Colombia, 8, Turkey, 8, South Africa, 7, Denmark, 5, Viet Nam, 5, Egypt, 3, Slovenia, 3, Chile, 2, New Zealand, 2,1.
We have estimated the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our Company (other than our President and Norway, 2. TheCEO) was $51,375 (using a consistently applied compensation measure of base salary, plus bonus, target commission, and the value of stock awards, as applicable).
We then calculated all the elements of such median employee’s compensation for fiscal year 2022 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total numbercompensation of U.S.$63,362, which includes the median employee’s total compensation as previously calculated and non-U.S.including additional elements such as term life insurance premiums paid by the Company and overtime.
In determining our calculation, the annual total compensation of our President and CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table presented elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, was $8,398,504.
Based on this information, for fiscal year 2022, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees was 133 to 1. We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
5054

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between the compensation actually paid to our named executive officers and the financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company’s aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
2022 Pay Versus Performance Table
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO (Eric Starkloff)1
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO (Eric
Starkloff)2
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Former PEO
(Alexander Davern)3
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Former
PEO
(Alexander
Davern)4
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs5
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO NEOs6
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net
Income
(millions)
Non-GAAP
Revenue Growth
(%)10
Total
Shareholder
Return7
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return8
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
2022
$8,398,504
$5,219,573
$2,765,286
$1,846,979
$87
$80
$139.6
11.0%
2021
$8,190,385
$5,028,215
$2,919,793
$2,434,470
$102
$115
$89.3
​13.4%
2020
$11,465,634
$11,818,530
$461,768
$(4,713,424)
$1,843,737
$1,839,488
$107
$120
$143.7
-6.0%
1
The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Starkloff (our President and CEO) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Refer to “Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Summary Compensation Table.”
2
The dollar amounts reported in column (c) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Starkloff, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Starkloff during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Starkloff’s total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for each year to determine the compensation actually paid:
Year
Reported
Summary Compensation
Table Total for PEO
(Eric Starkloff)
Reported
Value of Equity
Awards(a)
Equity
Award Adjustments(b)
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO (Eric Starkloff)
2022
$8,398,504
($7,266,432)
$4,087,501
$5,219,573
2021
$8,190,385
($6,659,514)
$3,497,344
$5,028,215
2020
$11,465,634
($10,414,680)
$10,767,576
$11,818,530
(a)
The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(b)
The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in same applicable year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock awards in the applicable year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the applicable year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair value did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows:
Year
Year End Fair
Value of Equity
Awards
Year over
Year Change
in Fair Value
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Equity
Awards
Fair
Value as
of
Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted
and
Vested in
the Year
Change in
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested
in the Year
Fair Value
at the End
of the
Prior Year
of Equity
Awards
that Failed
to Meet
Vesting
Conditions
in the Year
Value of
Dividends or
other Earnings
Paid on Stock
Awards not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Fair Value or
Total
Compensation
Total
Equity
Award
Adjustments
2022
$6,816,189
$(1,488,915)
$—
$(889,312)
$(350,460)
$—
$4,087,501
2021
$5,883,499
$(1,884,822)
$—
$(196,363)
$(304,970)
$—
$3,497,344
2020
$10,639,879
$327,527
$—
$(199,830)
$
$—
$10,767,576
3
Mr. Davern ceased to be our CEO, effective January 31, 2020, and continued to serve on our Board. The dollar amount reported in column (d) is the amount of total compensation reported for Mr. Davern for 2020 in the “Total” column of the 2020 Summary Compensation Table. Refer to “Executive Compensation – Executive Compensation Tables – Summary Compensation Table” in our proxy statement for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As Mr. Davern was not a Named Executive Officer for 2021 and 2022, we did not provide compensation information for such years.
4
The dollar amount reported in column (e) represents the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Davern in 2020, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amount does not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Davern during 2020. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Davern’s total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table compensation for 2020 to determine the compensation actually paid in 2020:
Year
Reported
Summary
Compensation Table
Total for Former PEO
(Alexander Davern)
Reported
Value of Equity
Awards(a)
Equity
Award Adjustments(b)
Compensation Actually Paid to
Former PEO (Alexander Davern)
2020
$461,768
($131,252)
$(5,043,940)
$(4,713,424)
(a)
The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020.
(b)
The equity award adjustments for 2020 include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in 2020 that are outstanding and unvested as of December 31, 2020; (ii) the amount of change as of December 31, 2020 (from the end of December 31, 2019) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of December 31, 2020; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in 2020, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in 2020, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the December 31, 2019) in fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during 2020, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of December 31, 2019; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock awards in 2020 prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other
56

TABLE OF CONTENTS

employees irrespectivecomponent of total compensation for 2020. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair value did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows:
Year
Year End Fair
Value of
Equity Awards
Year over
Year
Change in
Fair Value
of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Equity
Awards
Fair
Value as
of
Vesting
Date of
Equity
Awards
Granted
and
Vested in
the Year
Change in
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior
Years that
Vested in
the Year
Fair Value at
the End of
the Prior
Year of
Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet
Vesting
Conditions
in the Year
Value of
Dividends or
other
Earnings Paid
on Stock
Awards not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Fair Value or
Total
Compensation
Total
Equity
Award
Adjustments
2020
$156,251
$—
$—
$(499,909)
$(4,700,282)
$—
$(5,043,940)
5
The dollar amounts reported in column (f) represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff who has served as our President and CEO since February 2020 and Mr. Davern who served as our CEO through January 2020) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern, as applicable) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022 and 2021, Karen Rapp, Jason Green, Scott Rust and Ritu Favre and (ii) for 2020, Karen Rapp, Jason Green, Scott Rust and Carla Pineyro Sublett.
6
The dollar amounts reported in column (g) represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Footnote 2:
Year
Average
Reported
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs
Average
Reported
Value of Equity Awards
Average Equity
Award Adjustments(a)
Average Compensation Actually
Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
2022
$2,765,286
$(1,772,455)
$854,148
$1,846,979
2021
$2,919,793
$(2,053,900)
$1,568,578
$2,434,470
2020
$1,843,737
$(1,182,923)
$1,178,674
$1,839,488
(a)
The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows:
Year
Average
Year End
Fair Value of
Equity
Awards
Year over
Year
Average
Change in
Fair Value of
Outstanding
and
Unvested
Equity
Awards
Average Fair
Value as of
Vesting Date
of Equity
Awards
Granted and
Vested in
the Year
Year over
Year
Average
Change in
Fair Value
of Equity
Awards
Granted in
Prior Years
that Vested
in the Year
Average Fair
Value at the
End of the
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards that
Failed to
Meet Vesting
Conditions in
the Year
Average Value
of Dividends or
other Earnings
Paid on Stock
Awards not
Otherwise
Reflected in
Fair Value or
Total
Compensation
Total
Average
Equity
Award
Adjustments
2022
$1,619,185
$ (272,630)
$—
$(280,159)
$(212,248)
$—
$854,148
2021
$1,893,716
$(171,934)
$—
$(54,649)
$(98,555)
$—
$1,568,578
2020
$1,158,516
$70,246
$—
(50,088)
$
$—
$1,178,674
7
Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period.
8
The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: Russell 2000 Index.
57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

9
The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
10
Non-GAAP organic revenue growth (“Revenue Growth”) is defined as GAAP revenue (excluding (i) any acquisitions by the Company other than N H Research, LLC or (ii) any dispositions by the Company). While the Company uses numerous financial and non-financial performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance for the Company’s compensation programs, the Company has determined that Revenue Growth is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important financial performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance.
Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures

As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. The performance measures that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:
Revenue Growth
Non-GAAP operating margin levels based on organic results (“Operating Margin”)
Recurring billed value of all termed software subscription license agreements and perpetual maintenance agreements normalized to a one-year period (“Software Annual Recurring Revenue”).
Analysis of the exemption was 8,050. The number of U.S. and non-U.S. employees used for the de minimis calculation was 374. We also excluded those employees classified as “contingent workers” as well as employees with termination dates during December 2017 to January 2018, as they would not be activeInformation Presented in the futurePay versus Performance Table

As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and shouldAnalysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable “pay-for-performance” philosophy. While the Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance, all of those Company measures are not be eligible for selection as our “median” employee.
We identifiedpresented in the “median employee” taking all employees, excludingPay versus Performance Table. Moreover, the CEOCompany generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the other excluded groups described above, and ranking them based on annualized U.S. dollar equivalent base salary, converting the base salary in local currency utilizing the latest exchange rate table provided by our finance team.
After identifying the “median employee,” we identified and calculated the elements of such employee’sCompany’s performance measures with compensation for fiscal year 2019that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with the requirementsItem 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x)402(v) of Regulation S-K, resultingthe Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in annualthe Pay versus Performance Table.
58

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative TSR

As demonstrated by the following graph, the amount of compensation actually paid to our principal executive officer (or, in 2020, paid to both Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) and the average amount of compensation actually paid to our NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) is aligned with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three years presented in the table. The alignment of compensation actually paid with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the period presented is because a significant portion of the compensation actually paid to Ms. Starkloff and to the other NEOs is comprised of equity awards. As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in 2022, the Company targeted that approximately 78% of the value of the total compensation awarded to our President and CEO and 60% of $49,581.the value of the total compensation awarded to our other NEOs was to be comprised of equity awards, including RSUs and PRSUs.
With respectgraphic
59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

As demonstrated by the following graph, the amount of compensation actually paid to our principal executive officer (or, in 2020, paid to both Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) and the average amount of compensation actually paid to our NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) is generally aligned with the Company’s net income over the three years presented in the table. While the Company does not use net income as a performance measure in the overall executive compensation program, the measure of net income is correlated with the measure Revenue Growth. As discussed earlier, EIP payout to NEOs is determined based on the attainment of key corporate financial and operational objectives, including Revenue Growth. As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company targets that approximately 22% of the value of total compensation awarded to our principal executive officer consists of amounts determined under the Company short-term incentive compensation program and approximately 40% of the average value of total compensation awarded to our other NEOs consists of amounts determined under the Company short-term incentive compensation program.
graphic
60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Actually Paid and Revenue Growth

As demonstrated by the following graph, the amount of compensation actually paid to our principal executive officer (or, in 2020, paid to both Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) and the average amount of compensation actually paid to our NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Starkloff and Mr. Davern) is generally aligned with the Company’s Revenue Growth over the three years presented in the table. As described above, Revenue Growth is defined as non-GAAP organic revenue growth (excluding any acquisitions or dispositions by the Company). While the Company uses numerous financial and non-financial performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance for the Company’s compensation programs, the Company has determined that Revenue Growth is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the annualCompany’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance. The Company utilizes Revenue Growth when determining the EIP payout to our NEOs. As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in 2022, the Company targets that approximately 22% of the value of total compensation forawarded to our principal executive officer consists of amounts determined under the Company short-term incentive compensation program and approximately 40% of the average value of total compensation awarded to our other NEOs consists of amounts determined under the Company short-term incentive compensation program. Additionally, in 2022, the Company targeted that approximately 78% of the value of the total compensation awarded to our President and CEO we usedand 60% of the amount reportedvalue of the total compensation awarded to our other NEOs was to be comprised of equity awards, including RSUs and PRSUs.
graphic
61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cumulative TSR of the Company and Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group

As demonstrated by the following graph, the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three-year period presented in the “Total” columntable was -13%, while the cumulative TSR of our 2019 Summarythe peer group presented for this purpose, the Russell 2000, was -21% over the three years presented in the table. The Company’s cumulative TSR remained relatively steady compared to the Russell 2000 during the three years presented in the table, including in fiscal 2022 despite a challenging geopolitical and macroeconomic environment, including global supply chain disruptions, inflationary pressure and ongoing impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, representing the Company’s resilient performance as compared to the companies comprising the Russell 2000 peer group. For more information regarding the Company’s performance and the companies that the Compensation Table.Committee considers when determining executive compensation, please see the section entitled “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
graphic
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A)16(a) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires NI’sour officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of NI’sour equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 with the SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish NIus with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, NI believeswe believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2022, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to itsour officers, directors and 10% stockholders were satisfied except that there were two late Forms 4 filed for Mr. Kodosky with respect to four transactions, each.satisfied.
62

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The number of shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding RSUrestricted stock unit awards (RSUs and PRSUs) granted to employees and non-employee directors, as well as the number of shares remaining available for future issuance, under NI’sour equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019,2022, are summarized in the table below. NIWe had no outstanding options, warrants or other rights under equity compensation plans that have not been approved by stockholders as of such date.
Plan category
Number of
shares to
be issued
upon
vesting of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (2)
Number of
shares
remaining for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
Plan category
Number of
shares to
be issued
upon
vesting of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (1)
Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (2)
Number of
shares
remaining for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (3)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
3,289,637(1)
​6,006,541(3)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
4,020,452
10,249,246
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
Total
3,289,637
6,006,541
Total
4,020,452
10,249,246
(1)

Includes 3,289,6374,020,452 shares to be issued upon the vesting of outstanding RSUs.restricted stock units.
(2)

All awards were RSUsrestricted stock units which do not have an exercise price. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of outstanding RSUs was $41.01.
(3)

Includes 1,920,7716,176,156 shares available for future issuance under the 20152022 Incentive Plan and 4,085,7704,073,090 shares available for future issuance under the ESPP.
5163

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE*COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The members of the Audit Committee are CharlesGayla J. Roesslein,Delly, James E. Cashman, III, Dr. Gerhard P. Fettweis and Michael E. McGrath. All members of the Audit Committee meet the independence requirements of the Nasdaq listing standards.
Management is responsible for NI’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. NI’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of NI’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and for issuing opinions on the conformity of those audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of NI’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
The Audit Committee schedules its meetings and conference calls with a view to ensuring it devotes appropriate attention to all of its tasks. The Audit Committee met five5 times during fiscal 20192022 to carry out its responsibilities. The Audit Committee regularly meets privately with NI’s independent registered public accounting firm, internal audit personnel, and management, each of whom has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee evaluated the performance of the items enumerated in the Audit Committee Charter, which includes oversight of NI’s internal audit function.
As part of its oversight of NI’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with both management and the independent registered public accounting firm NI’s quarterly and audited fiscal year financial statements, including a review of NI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Audit Committee also reviewed and approved the independent registered public accounting firm’s work plan, audit fees, and all non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm any matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended.
The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures from Ernst & Young LLP required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed the independence of Ernst & Young LLP with that firm. The Audit Committee has implemented a procedure to monitor the independence of NI’s independent registered public accounting firm.
Based upon the Audit Committee’s discussions with management and Ernst & Young LLP and the report of Ernst & Young LLP to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in NI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, which washas been filed with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
CharlesGayla J. Roesslein,Delly, Chair

James E. Cashman, III

Dr. Gerhard P. Fettweis

Michael E. McGrath
*
The foregoing Report of the Audit Committee is not to be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or we specifically incorporate it by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
5264

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF THE NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
2020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
OurIn accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our stockholders are being askedhave the opportunity to cast an annual advisory vote to approve the National Instruments Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2020 Incentive Plan”compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules (commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay”) so.
As described under the heading “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate our Named Executive Officers, who are critical to our success. We believe that it maythe various elements of our executive compensation program work together to promote our goal of ensuring that total compensation should be usedrelated to achieve NI's compensatory goals. Our current equity plan,both NI’s performance and individual performance.
Stockholders are urged to read the 2015 Incentive Plan, is scheduled to terminate upon“Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, which discusses how our executive compensation policies implement our compensation philosophy, and the date“Executive Compensation — Summary Compensation Table” section of this Proxy Statement, which contains tabular information and narrative discussion about the Annual Meeting (the “Annual Meeting Date”). The 2020 Incentive Plan would replace the 2015 Incentive Plan, although the 2015 Incentive Plan will continue to govern outstanding awards previously granted thereunder.
On October 23, 2019, the Boardcompensation of Directors of NI approved the 2020 Incentive Plan, subject to approval from the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Approval of the 2020 Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock that are present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal. NI'sour Named Executive Officers and directors have an interestadditional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about fiscal year 2022 compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee and our Board believe that these policies are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals.
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our executive compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This Say-on-Pay proposal as theygives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we are expectedasking our stockholders to receive Awards (defined below) underapprove, on an advisory basis, the 2020 Incentive Plan.
In connection with the approvalcompensation of the 2020 Incentive Plan, we are requesting stockholder approval of a share reserve under the 2020 Incentive Plan of 4,500,000 shares of NI common stock, plus (i) the number of shares which have been reserved, but not issued under the 2015 Incentive Plan, the 2010 Incentive Plan and the 2005 Incentive PlanNamed Executive Officers, as of the Annual Meeting Date, and (ii) any shares returned to the 2015 Incentive Plan, the 2010 Incentive Plan or the 2005 Incentive Plan, as a result of the expiration or termination of Awards (as defineddisclosed in the 2020 Incentive Plan), or the forfeiture or repurchase of the underlying shares, after the Annual Meeting Date.
By approving the 2020 Incentive Plan, the stockholders will be approving, among other things, a provision that prohibits any Non-Employee Director (defined below) from being granted, in any fiscal year, Awards covering more than 20,000 shares, exclusive of Awards received as an employee or consultant.
We strongly believe that the approval of the 2020 Incentive Plan is essential to NI's continued success. Our service providers are our most valuable asset. Grants of restricted stock units and restricted stockthis Proxy Statement pursuant to the provisionscompensation disclosure rules of the 2020 Incentive Plan are crucial to our ability to attractSEC, including the Compensation Discussion and retain highly skilled individualsAnalysis, the Summary Compensation Table and to provide additional incentives to achieve NI's goals. We ask the stockholders to approve the 2020 Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors has not determined what action it will take if the proposal is not approved by the stockholders.
Summary of the 2020 Incentive Planother related tables and disclosure.
The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of the 2020 Incentive PlanSay-on-Pay vote is advisory, and its operation. The following summary is qualified by, and should be read together with, the complete copy of the 2020 Incentive Plan set forth in Exhibit A.
Grants of Awards. The 2020 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of the following types of Awards: (i) restricted stock and (ii) restricted stock units, collectively referred to as “Awards.” Awards may be granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan to employees, directors and consultants oftherefore not binding on NI, and of any parent or subsidiary entity. Subject to the terms of the 2020 Incentive Plan, including the Administrator’s authority to delegate its authority, the Administrator has the sole discretion to determine which service providers will receive Awards, to determine the terms and conditions of those Awards, and to approve forms of agreement for use under the 2020 Incentive Plan.
As of March 6, 2020, approximately 4,959 persons, including approximately 4,947 employees, 5 executive officers and 7 non-employee directors were eligible to receive awards under the 2020 Incentive Plan.
Number of Shares of Common Stock Available Under the 2020 Incentive Plan. Upon stockholder approval, the 2020 Incentive Plan share reserve will include 4,500,000 shares of NI's common stock plus (i) the number of shares which have been reserved but not issued under the 2015 Incentive Plan, the 2010 Incentive Plan and the 2005 Incentive Plan as of the Annual Meeting Date, and (ii) any shares returned to the 2015 Incentive Plan, the 2010 Incentive Plan or the 2005 Incentive Plan, as a result of the expiration or termination of Awards, or the forfeiture or repurchase of the underlying shares, after the Annual Meeting Date.
If any Award granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan expires, is surrendered pursuant to an exchange program or otherwise terminates, or if any restricted shares are otherwise forfeited or repurchased by the company, the shares subject to such Award will become available for future Award grants under the 2020 Incentive Plan. Additionally, shares used to satisfy the tax withholding obligations of an Award will become available for future grant under the 2020 Incentive Plan.
53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Adjustment of Reserve and Awards. The number of shares authorized and available for issuance under the 2020 Incentive Plan (and represented by outstanding Awards) shall be adjusted in the event of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, reorganization or similar action.
Administration of the 2020 Incentive Plan. The 2020 Incentive Plan will be administered by the Board, the Compensation Committee, or another committeeour Board. However, our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of the Board (the “Administrator”). The Administrator may, in its discretionour stockholders and to the extent permitted by applicable laws, delegate to a committee, including, but not limited to, one comprised of one or more executive officers of NI,there is any significant vote against the authority to grant one or more Awards, without further approval of the Administrator. To qualify grants to certain NI officers and employeesNamed Executive Officer compensation as exempt from Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), however, the members of such committee must qualify as “non-employee directors” under Rule 16b-3 (“Non-Employee Directors”).
Restricted Stock. Awards of restricted stock resultdisclosed in the issuance of shares of NI common stock to the recipient, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Administrator. Each Award of restricted stockthis Proxy Statement, we will be evidenced by a written agreement between NIconsider our stockholders’ concerns and the participant specifying the number of shares subjectCompensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to the Awardaddress those concerns. The Say-on-Pay vote is conducted annually, and the other terms and conditions of the Award as determined by the Administrator. Generally, shares of restricted stocknext such vote will be held by NI in an escrow account until the restrictions on the shares of restricted stock have lapsed. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, holders of restricted stock subject to restrictions may exercise voting rights and will be entitled to dividends paid on shares during the restriction period.
Restricted Stock Units. The Administrator may grant restricted stock units, which represent a right to receive cash, shares, or a combination of both at a future date. Restricted stock units will result in a payment to a participant only if the performance goals or other vesting criteria are achieved or the Awards otherwise vest in accordance with their terms. Earned restricted stock units may be paid out in cash, shares of common stock or any combination thereofoccur at the sole discretion2024 annual meeting of the Administrator.
Performance Goals. In the Administrator’s discretion, Awards granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals, which may include achievement of company-wide, business unit, or individual goals and which may differ from participant to participant and from Award to Award.
Transferability of Awards. Generally, and unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, no Award granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan may be transferred other than by the laws of descent and distribution and all rights with respect to an Award will generally be available only to the participant receiving such Award.
Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2020 Incentive Plan), all outstanding and unvested equity awards will be treated as determined by the Administrator, including that each award be assumed or substituted by the successor corporation; provided, that, in the event the successor corporation does not assume or substitute awards, the restriction period of any award of restricted stock or restricted stock units shall immediately be accelerated and the restrictions shall expire. Following any such assumption or substitution of awards, if an employee is terminated without Cause (as defined in the 2020 Incentive Plan) within twenty-four (24) months following the change in control, then the vesting of such employee’s awards will accelerate and the restricted stock units will immediately become fully vested.
Restructuring. The Award is not affected by a Restructuring (as defined in the 2020 Incentive Plan) that does not occur in connection with a Change in Control, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator in accordance with the terms of the 2020 Incentive Plan.
Amendment and Termination of the 2020 Incentive Plan. The Administrator will have the authority to amend, alter, suspend or terminate the 2020 Incentive Plan, except that stockholder approval will be required to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable laws. Any amendment, alteration, suspension or termination will not, without the consent of the participant, impair the rights or obligations under any Award granted under the 2020 Incentive Plan. The 2020 Incentive Plan will terminate upon NI’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in 2025 but no later than December 31, 2025, unless terminated earlier by the Administrator.
Number of Awards Granted
The number of Awards that any employee, consultant or director receives is in the discretion of the Administrator and cannot be determined in advance (other than awards for non-employee directors described in the section titled “Board Compensation—Restricted Stock Unit Awards” above). Future Awards that would be received under the 2020 Incentive Plan by an employee, consultant or director are discretionary and are therefore not determinable at this time.
54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We have not approved any Awards that are conditioned on stockholder approval of the 2020 Incentive Plan. If stockholders approve the 2020 Incentive Plan at the Annual Meeting, it is expected that each individual continuing as a non-employee director will receive a grant described in the section titled “Board Compensation—Restricted Stock Unit Awards” above.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the grant of RSUs and PRSUs under the 2015 Incentive Plan during fiscal 2019 (no other type of award was granted under the 2015 Incentive Plan during fiscal 2019) to each of our named executive officers during fiscal 2019 (with roles held during 2019), all current executive officers as a group, all current Non-Employee Directors as a group, and all employees who are not executive officers as a group:
Name of Individual or Group
RSUs
Granted (#)
Grant Date
Fair Value of
RSUs
PRSUs
Granted (#)(1)
Grant Date
Fair Value of
PRSUs ($)
Alexander M. Davern
Former Chief Executive Officer
53,000
$2,343,660
106,000
$4,687,320
Eric H. Starkloff
President and Chief Executive Officer
16,625
762,589
33,250
1,525,178
Karen M. Rapp
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
13,006
596,585
26,012
1,193,170
Scott A. Rust
Senior Vice President, Global Product Research and
Development
8,482
389,069
16,964
778,139
John C. Roiko
Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
1,696
77,796
3,392
155,591
All current executive officers as a group (5 people)
77,297
3,554,181
76,226
3,496,487
All current non-employee directors as a group (7 people)
29,592
1,400,293
All employees who are not executive officers as a group
1,106,689
50,863,360
109,392
4,842,911
(1)
Amounts indicated are based on maximum achievement of the applicable performance goals.
Federal Tax Aspects
The following summary is intended only as a general guide to the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of participation in the 2020 Incentive Plan. The summary is based on existing U.S. laws and regulations, and there can be no assurance that those laws and regulations will not change in the future. The summary does not purport to be complete and does not discuss the tax consequences upon a participant’s death, or the provisions of the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign country in which the participant may reside. As a result, tax consequences for any particular individual may be different.
Restricted Stock Awards. There are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an Award of restricted stock for which the recipient does not make an 83(b) election pursuant to the Code. A participant acquiring restricted stock generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date. If the participant is an employee, such ordinary income generally is subject to withholding of income and employment taxes. However, the participant may elect, pursuant to Code Section 83(b), to be taxed on the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. Upon subsequent sale of the shares, the participant will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the sale price and the fair market value on the date the ordinary income tax event occurs, and such amount will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on the holding period for such shares.
Restricted Stock Units. There are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an Award of restricted stock units. A participant who is awarded restricted stock units will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares issued or cash paid to such participant on the settlement date (i.e. generally, shortly following the vesting event). Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of any shares received would be short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on the holding period for such shares.
Section 409A. Code Section 409A provides requirements for non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements. If an Award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 409A, the recipient of that Award may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the Award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when
55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an Award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409A’s provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% federal income tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation. Restricted stock is not subject to Code Section 409A. The RSU Awards will generally be designed with the intent to be exempt from Code Section 409A.
Medicare Surtax. A participant’s annual “net investment income”, as defined in Section 1411 of the Code, may be subject to a 3.8% federal surtax (generally referred to as the “Medicare Surtax”). Net investment income may include capital gain and/or loss arising from the disposition of shares issued under an Award. Whether a participant’s net investment income will be subject to the Medicare Surtax will depend on the participant’s level of annual income and other factors.
Tax Effect for NI. NI generally will be entitled to an income tax deduction in connection with an Award under the 2020 Incentive Plan at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, the vesting of restricted stock). The amount of such tax deduction generally equals the amount of ordinary income realized by a participant. Special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to our chief executive officer and other “covered employees” as determined under Section 162(m) and applicable guidance. Under Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to any of these specified executives will be deductible only to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000.stockholders.
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of Directors
Approval of the National Instruments Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive PlanNI’s executive compensation program requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote who are present, in person or by proxy, on the proposal.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the National Instruments Corporation 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.Corporation's Executive Compensation Program, as described in this Proxy Statement.
5665

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF
FREQUENCY OF STOCKHOLDER VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
As described in Proposal Two above, our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, this Proposal Three affords stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include a Say-on-Pay proposal in our proxy materials for future annual stockholder meetings or any special stockholder meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting. Under this Proposal Three, stockholders may vote to have the Say-on-Pay vote every year, every two years, or every three years.
Our stockholders voted on a similar proposal in 2017 with most stockholders voting to hold the Say-on-Pay vote every year. Our Board and Compensation Committee continue to believe that Say-on-Pay advisory votes should be conducted each year so that our stockholders may express their views on our executive compensation program and the Compensation Committee can consider such views in its compensation planning for the fiscal year following the Say-on-Pay advisory vote.
Stockholders may cast their advisory vote to conduct advisory votes on executive compensation every “1 Year,” “2 Years,” or “3 Years,” or “Abstain.”
It is expected that the next Say-on-Pay frequency vote will occur at the 2029 annual meeting of stockholders.
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The selection regarding the frequency of the stockholder vote on executive compensation receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes shall be considered the frequency of the stockholder vote on executive compensation that is preferred by our stockholders. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on NI, the Board, or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions expressed by stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making a decision regarding the frequency of conducting a Say-on-Pay vote.
The Board recommends that on Proposal Three you vote for future advisory votes on executive compensation to occur every “1 Year.”
66

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The charter of our Audit Committee provides that the Audit Committee shall appoint, compensate, retain and oversee NI’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) as NI’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.2023. The Board of Directors is asking the stockholders to ratify this appointment. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and voting at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the selectionappointment of E&Y, which has served as NI’s independent registered public accounting firm since June 2005.
In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, our Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of NI and NI’s stockholders.
A representative of E&Y is expected to be available at the Annual Meeting to make a statement if such representative desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the integrated audits of NI’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, for the reviews of the financial statements included in NI’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for those fiscal years, for the audit of NI’s internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for those fiscal years, and for statutory audits in various countries were approximately $1,675,000$2,971,000 and $1,883,000,$1,954,000, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
Audit-related fees for 2019each of 2022 and 2021 were $5,000. There were no fees billed for audit-related services in 2018.$0.
The services rendered related to professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the world-wide audit or review of NI's financial statements.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed for professional tax services rendered for 20192022 and 20182021 were approximately $490,000$757,000 and $440,000,$458,000, respectively. Included in the foregoing tax fees are such services as tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees
There were no fees billed for other services in 20192022 or 2018.2021.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all services provided by NI’s independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. The independent registered public accounting firm is required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by such firm in accordance with such pre-approval. The Audit Committee may also delegate pre-approval authority to one of its members. Such member(s) must report any decisions to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled meeting. During 2019,2022 and 2021, the Audit Committee approved in advance all audit, audit-related, and tax services to be provided by E&Y. E&Y has not performed any “prohibited activities” as such term is defined in Section 201 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of Directors
Ratification of the appointment of E&Y as National Instruments Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote who are present in personat the meeting (electronically) or by proxy, on the proposal.
Upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the Appointment of E&Y as National Instruments Corporation's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.
57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL FOUR: APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Act enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules (commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay”).
As described under the heading “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate our Named Executive Officers, who are critical to our success. We believe that the various elements of our executive compensation program work together to promote our goal of ensuring that total compensation should be related to both NI’s performance and individual performance.
Stockholders are urged to read the “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement, which discusses how our executive compensation policies implement our compensation philosophy, and the “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table” section of this Proxy Statement, which contains tabular information and narrative discussion about the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about fiscal year 2019 compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee and the NI Board of Directors believe that these policies are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals.
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our executive compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This Say-on-Pay proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.
The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on NI, the Compensation Committee or our Board of Directors. However, our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the Named Executive Officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. The Say-on-Pay vote is conducted annually, and the next such vote will occur at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of Directors
Approval of NI’s executive compensation program requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote who are present, in person or by proxy, on the proposal.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the National Instruments Corporation's Executive Compensation Program, as described in this Proxy Statement.
5868

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CODE OF ETHICS
In February 2012, NI’sOur Board of Directors adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors and employees, including NI’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics incorporated several corporate policies which had been in effect since 1994. The Code of Ethics is available on NI’s website at www.ni.com/nati/corporategovernance/code_of_ethics.htm. NI intends to disclose future amendmentsany changes to provisions of the Code of Ethics, or waivers of such provisions grantedfrom this code by posting to executive officers, on NI’sour website within four business days following the date of such amendmentif disclosure is required by SEC or waiver.Nasdaq rules.
OTHER MATTERS
NI knows of no other matters to be submitted at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the shares they represent as the Board of Directors may recommend.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/s/ graphic
R. Eddie Dixon, Jr.

Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President & Secretary
Austin, Texas

March 24, 202027, 2023
5969

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit AForward Looking Statements
NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
2020 Equity Incentive Plan
(This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as approved byamended, and Section 21E of the Board of Directors,Exchange Act that are subject to stockholder approval)
risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained herein regarding our future financial performance, operations, strategy and goals relating to Engineering Hope and our corporate impact strategy or other matters (including, without limitation, statements to the effect that we “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “intend to,” “project,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “seek to,” “strive to,” “endeavor to,” “are committed to,” “remain committed to,” “focus on,” “are encouraged by,” “remain cautious,” “remain optimistic” or “estimate”; statements of “goals,” “initiatives,” “commitments,” “strategy”, “focus” or “visions”; or other variations thereof or comparable terminology or the negative thereof) should be considered forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections of future events. We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of important factors which could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties include without limitation: the global shortage of key components; effect of the global economic and geopolitical conditions; our international operations and foreign economies; adverse public health matters, including epidemics and pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic; our ability to effectively manage our partners and distribution channels; interruptions in our technology systems or cyber-attacks on our systems; the dependency of our product revenue on certain industries and the risk of contractions in such industries; concentration of credit risk and uncertain conditions in the global financial markets; our ability to compete in markets that are highly competitive; our ability to release successful new products or achieve expected returns; the risk that our manufacturing capacity and a substantial majority of our warehousing and distribution capacity are located outside of the U.S.; our dependence on key suppliers and distributors; longer delivery lead times from our suppliers; risk of product liability claims; dependence on our proprietary rights and risks of intellectual property litigation; the continued service of key management, technical personnel and operational employees; our ability to comply with environmental laws and associated costs; our ability to maintain our website; the risks of bugs, vulnerabilities, errors or design flaws in our products; our restructuring activities; our exposure to large orders; our shift to more system orders; our ability to effectively manage our operating expenses and meet budget; fluctuations in our quarterly results due to factors outside of our control; our outstanding debt; the interest rate risk associated with our variable rate indebtedness; seasonal variation in our revenues; our ability to comply with laws and regulations; changes in tax rates and exposure to additional tax liabilities; our ability to make certain acquisitions or dispositions, integrate the companies we acquire or separate the companies we sold and/or enter into strategic relationships; risks related to currency fluctuations; provisions in charter documents and Delaware law that delay or prevent our acquisition; and risks related to our strategic review process. We direct readers to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the other documents we file with the SEC for other risks associated with our future performance. You should not place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
2020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANANNEX I
1. PurposesNON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Below is a reconciliation of the Plan. The purposes of this Plan are:certain non-GAAP financial measures discussed in our 2022 Proxy Statement.
to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility,Non-GAAP Organic Revenue
Reconciliation of Revenue to Organic Revenue
FY22
Revenue, as reported
1,656,975
Impact of acquisition related fair value adjustments
956
Non-GAAP revenue
1,657,931
Acquisitions/divestitures (other than the acquisition of N H Research, LLC)
(24,439)
Organic revenue
1,633,492
to provide incentives to individuals who perform services to the Company, andNon-GAAP Operating Margin
to promote the success of the Company’s business.
The Plan permits the grant of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.
2. Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions will apply:
(a) “Administrator” means the Board or any of its Committees as will be administering the Plan, in accordance with Section 4 of the Plan.
(b) “Applicable Laws” means the requirements relating to the administration of equity-based awards under U.S. state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, the Code, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Awards are, or will be, granted under the Plan.
(c) “Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units.
(d) “Award Agreement” means the written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to each Award granted under the Plan. The Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.
(e) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
(f) “Cause” means (i) the commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement or theft by the Participant in connection with such Participant’s responsibilities as a Service Provider; (ii) conviction of, or a plea of “guilty” or “nolo contendere” to, a felony under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or a comparable offense under Applicable Laws for non-U.S. Service Providers; (iii) any unauthorized use or disclosure by Participant of proprietary information or trade secrets of the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary); (iv) a willful act by Participant which constitutes misconduct and is materially injurious to the Company (or any Parent or Subsidiary); or (v) continued violations by Participant of Participant’s obligations to the Company after there has been delivered to the Service Provider a written demand for performance from the Company.
(g) “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i) Any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then outstanding voting securities; or
(ii) The consummation of the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; or
(iii) A change in the composition of the Board as a result of which fewer than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors; or
(iv) The consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.
Reconciliation of Operating Margin to Organic Operating Margin
FY22
Operating margin, as reported
11.6%
Stock-based compensation
4.7%
Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles and fair value adjustments
2.8%
Acquisition transaction and integration costs, restructuring charges and other
0.5%
Net amortization of internally developed software costs
0.3%
Non-GAAP operating margin
19.9%
Acquisitions/divestitures
0.5%
Organic operating margin
20.4%
A-1I-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(h) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Reference to a specific section of the Code or Treasury Regulation thereunder will include such section or regulation, any valid regulation or other official applicable guidance promulgated under such section, and any comparable provision of any future legislation or regulation amending, supplementing or superseding such section or regulation.graphic
(i) “Committee” means a committee of Directors or of other individuals satisfying Applicable Laws appointed by the Board in accordance with Section 4 hereof.
(j) “Common Stock” means the common stock of the Company.
(k) “Company” means National Instruments Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or any successor thereto.
(l) “Consultant” means any person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company to render services to such entity.
(m) “Director” means a member of the Board.
(n) “Disability” shall have the meaning given it in the employment agreement of the Participant; provided, however, that if that Participant has no employment agreement, “Disability” shall mean, as determined by the Administrator in the sole discretion exercised in good faith of the Board, a physical or mental impairment of sufficient severity that either the Participant is unable to continue performing the duties he or she performed before such impairment or the Participant’s condition entitles him or her to disability benefits under any insurance or employee benefit plan of the Company or its Subsidiaries and that impairment or condition is cited by the Company as the reason for termination if the Participant ceases to be a Service Provider.
(o) “Employee” means any person, including Officers and Directors, employed by the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company will be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.
(p) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(q) “Exchange Program” means a program under which outstanding Awards are surrendered or cancelled in exchange for Awards of the same type, a different type of award, and/or cash. The Administrator will determine the terms and conditions of any Exchange Program in its sole discretion.
(r) “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of Common Stock as the Administrator may determine in good faith.
(s) “Fiscal Year” means the fiscal year of the Company.
(t) “Incumbent Directors” means directors who either (A) are Directors as of the effective date of the Plan, or (B) are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at the time of such election or nomination (but will not include an individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors to the Company).
(u) “Non-Surviving Event” means an event of Restructuring as described in Section 2(dd)(ii).
(v) “Officer” means a person who is an officer of the Company within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(w) “Outside Director” means a Director who is not an Employee.
(x) “Parent” means a “parent corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(e) of the Code.
(y) “Participant” means the holder of an outstanding Award.
(z) “Period of Restriction” means the period during which the transfer of Shares of Restricted Stock are subject to restrictions and therefore, the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Such restrictions may be based on the passage of time, the achievement of target levels of performance, or the occurrence of other events as determined by the Administrator.
(aa) “Plan” means this 2020 Equity Incentive Plan.
(bb) “Restricted Stock” means Shares issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock award under Section 6 of the Plan.
A-2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(cc) “Restricted Stock Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share, granted pursuant to Section 7. Each Restricted Stock Unit represents an unfunded and unsecured obligation of the Company.
(dd) “Restructuring” means the occurrence of any one or more of the following:
(i) The merger or consolidation of the Company with any person, whether effected as a single transaction or a series of related transactions, with the Company remaining the continuing or surviving entity of that merger or consolidation and the Shares remaining outstanding and not changed into or exchanged for stock or other securities of any other person or of the Company, cash, or other property; or
(ii) The merger or consolidation of the Company with any person, whether effected as a single transaction or a series of related transactions, with (i) the Company not being the continuing or surviving entity of that merger or consolidation or (ii) the Company remaining the continuing or surviving entity of that merger or consolidation but all or a part of the outstanding Shares are changed into or exchanged for stock or other securities of any other person or the Company, cash, or other property.
(ee) “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act or any successor to Rule 16b-3, as in effect when discretion is being exercised with respect to the Plan.
(ff) “Section 16(b)” means Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.
(gg) “Section 409A” means Code Section 409A, as it has been and may be amended from time to time, and any proposed or final Treasury Regulations and Internal Revenue Service guidance that has been promulgated or may be promulgated thereunder from time to time.
(hh) “Service Provider” means an Employee, Director or Consultant. The Administrator shall determine in good faith and in the exercise of its discretion whether an individual has become or has ceased to be a Service Provider and the effective date of such individual’s status as, or cessation of status as, a Service Provider. For purposes of an individual’s rights, if any, under the Plan as of the time of the Administrator’s determination, all such determinations by the Administrator shall be final, binding and conclusive.
(ii) “Share” means a share of the Common Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 11 of the Plan.
(jj) “Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 424(f) of the Code.
(kk) “Voting Securities” means any securities that are entitled to vote generally in the election of Directors, in the admission of general partners or in the selection of any other similar governing body.
3. Stock Subject to the Plan.
(a) Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 11 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be awarded and sold under the Plan is 4,500,000 plus (i) such number of Shares which have been reserved but not issued under the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), the Company’s 2010 Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) and the Company’s 2005 Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) as of the date stockholders approve the Plan, and (ii) any Shares subject to awards under the Company’s 2015 Plan, 2010 Plan or 2005 Plan that, after the date stockholders approve the Plan, expire or otherwise terminate without having been vested in full or Shares issued under such plans that are forfeited to or repurchased by the Company due to failure to vest. Shares shall not be deemed to have been issued pursuant to the Plan with respect to any portion of an Award that is settled in cash. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.
(b) Lapsed Awards. If an Award expires, is surrendered pursuant to an Exchange Program, is forfeited to or repurchased by the Company or otherwise terminates, the forfeited, repurchased or unissued Shares which were subject thereto will become available for future grant or sale under the Plan (unless the Plan has terminated). However, Shares that have actually been issued under the Plan under any Award will not be returned to the Plan and will not become available for future distribution under the Plan; provided, however, that if unvested Shares of Restricted Stock are repurchased by the Company or are forfeited to the Company, such Shares will become available for future grant under the Plan. Shares used to pay the tax withholding obligations related to an Award or the purchase price of an Award will become available for future grant or sale under the Plan. To the extent an Award under the Plan is paid out in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan.
A-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(c) Share Reserve. The Company, during the term of this Plan, will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as will be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan.
4. Administration of the Plan.
(a) Procedure.
(i) Multiple Administrative Bodies. Different Committees with respect to different groups of Service Providers may administer the Plan.
(ii) Rule 16b-3. To the extent desirable to qualify transactions hereunder as exempt under Rule 16b-3, the transactions contemplated hereunder will be structured to satisfy the requirements for exemption under Rule 16b-3.
(iii) Other Administration. Other than as provided above, the Plan will be administered by (A) the Board or (B) a Committee, which committee will be constituted to satisfy Applicable Laws. The Administrator may, in its discretion and to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, delegate to a Committee, including but not limited to, a Committee comprised of one or more Officers, the authority to grant one or more Awards, without further approval of the Administrator, on such terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its discretion, deems appropriate. To the extent of any delegation by the Administrator, references to the Administrator in the Plan and any Award Agreement shall be deemed also to include reference to the applicable delegate(s).
(b) Powers of the Administrator. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, and in the case of a Committee, subject to the specific duties delegated by the Board to such Committee, the Administrator will have the authority, in its discretion:
(i) to determine the Fair Market Value;
(ii) to select the Service Providers to whom Awards may be granted hereunder;
(iii) to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder. Such terms may include, but are not limited to, performance goals applicable to an Award, which may differ from Participant to Participant and from Award to Award;
(iv) to approve forms of agreement for use under the Plan;
(v) to institute an Exchange Program;
(vi) to construe and interpret the terms of the Plan and Awards granted pursuant to the Plan;
(vii) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including rules and regulations relating to sub-plans established for the purpose of satisfying applicable foreign laws or for qualifying for favorable tax treatment under applicable foreign laws;
(viii) to modify or amend each Award (subject to Section 16(c) of the Plan);
(ix) to authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effect the grant of an Award previously granted by the Administrator;
(x) to allow Participants to satisfy withholding tax obligations in such manner as prescribed in Section 12 of the Plan;
(xi) to allow a Participant to defer the receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant under an Award pursuant to such procedures as the Administrator may determine; and
(xii) to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for administering the Plan.
(c) Effect of Administrator’s Decision. The Administrator’s decisions, determinations and interpretations will be final and binding on all Participants and any other holders of Awards.
(d) No Liability. Under no circumstances shall the Company, its Parent or Subsidiary companies, the Administrator, or the Board incur liability for any indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages (including lost profits) of any form incurred by any person, whether or not foreseeable and regardless of the form of the act in which such a claim may be brought, with respect to the Plan or the Company’s, its Parent or Subsidiary companies’, the Administrator’s or the Board’s roles in connection with the Plan.
A-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5. Eligibility. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units may be granted to Service Providers.
6. Restricted Stock.
(a) Grant of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Administrator, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock to Service Providers in such amounts as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine.
(b) Restricted Stock Agreement. Each Award of Restricted Stock will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that will specify the Period of Restriction, the number of Shares granted, and such other terms and conditions as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, will determine. Unless the Administrator determines otherwise, Shares of Restricted Stock will be held by the Company as escrow agent until the restrictions on such Shares have lapsed.
(c) Transferability. Except as provided in this Section 6, Shares of Restricted Stock may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the end of the applicable Period of Restriction.
(d) Other Restrictions. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may impose such other restrictions on Shares of Restricted Stock as it may deem advisable or appropriate.
(e) Removal of Restrictions. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 6, Shares of Restricted Stock covered by each Restricted Stock grant made under the Plan will be released from escrow as soon as practicable after the last day of the Period of Restriction or at such other time as the Administrator may determine. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any restrictions for such Award and may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.
(f) Voting Rights. During the Period of Restriction, Service Providers holding Shares of Restricted Stock granted hereunder may exercise any voting rights with respect to those Shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise.
(g) Dividends and Other Distributions. During the Period of Restriction, Service Providers holding Shares of Restricted Stock will be entitled to receive any cash dividends paid with respect to such Shares, unless the Administrator determines otherwise. During the Period of Restriction, if dividends or distributions are paid in Shares, Service Providers holding Shares of Restricted Stock will be entitled to such dividends or distributions. The Shares received pursuant to any such dividend or distribution will be subject to the same restrictions on transferability and forfeitability as the Shares of Restricted Stock with respect to which they were issued.
(h) Return of Restricted Stock to Company. On the date set forth in the Award Agreement, the Restricted Stock for which restrictions have not lapsed will revert to the Company and again will become available for grant under the Plan.
7. Restricted Stock Units.
(a) Grant. Restricted Stock Units may be granted at any time and from time to time as determined by the Administrator. After the Administrator determines that it will grant Restricted Stock Units under the Plan, it will advise the Participant in writing or electronically of the terms, conditions, and restrictions related to the grant, including the number of Restricted Stock Units and the form of payout, which, subject to Section 7(d), may be left to the discretion of the Administrator.
(b) Vesting Criteria and Other Terms. The Administrator will set vesting criteria in its discretion, which, depending on the extent to which the criteria are met, will determine the number of Restricted Stock Units that will be paid out to the Participant. The Administrator may set vesting criteria based upon the achievement of Company-wide, business unit, or individual goals (including, but not limited to, continued employment), or any other basis determined by the Administrator in its discretion.
(c) Earning Restricted Stock Units. Upon meeting the applicable vesting criteria, the Participant will be entitled to receive a payout as determined by the Administrator. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time after the grant of Restricted Stock Units, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any vesting criteria that must be met to receive a payout and may accelerate the time at which any restrictions will lapse or be removed.
(d) Form and Timing of Payment. Payment of earned Restricted Stock Units will be made as soon as practicable after the date(s) set forth in the Award Agreement. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Restricted Stock Units in cash, Shares, or a combination thereof.
A-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(e) Cancellation. On the date set forth in the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, all unearned Restricted Stock Units will be forfeited to the Company.
8. Leaves of Absence/Transfer Between Locations. Unless the Administrator provides otherwise and except as required by Applicable Laws, vesting of Awards granted hereunder will be suspended during any unpaid leave of absence. A Participant will not cease to be an Employee in the case of (i) any leave of absence approved by the Company or (ii) transfers between locations of the Company or between the Company, its Parent, or any Subsidiary.
9. Outside Director Limitations. No Outside Director may be granted, in any Fiscal Year, Awards covering more than 20,000 Shares. Any Awards provided to an individual for his or her services as an Employee, or for his or her services as a Consultant other than an Outside Director, will be excluded for purposes of this Section 9.
10. Transferability of Awards. Unless determined otherwise by the Administrator, an Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant. If the Administrator makes an Award transferable, such Award will contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator deems appropriate.
11. Adjustments; Dissolution or Liquidation; Merger or Change in Control.
(a) Adjustment of Awards and Authorized Shares. The terms of an Award and the number of Shares authorized pursuant to Section 3 for issuance under the Plan and the numerical Share limit set forth in Section 9 shall be subject to adjustment from time to time, in accordance with the following provisions:
(i) If at any time, or from time to time, the Company shall subdivide as a whole (by reclassification, by a stock split, by the issuance of a distribution on Shares payable in Shares, or otherwise) the number of Shares then outstanding into a greater number of Shares, then (i) the maximum number of Shares available for the Plan as provided in Section 3 and the numerical Share limit set forth in Section 9 shall be increased proportionately, and the kind of shares or other securities available for the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted, (ii) the number of Shares (or other kind of shares or securities) that may be acquired under any Award shall be increased proportionately, and (iii) the price, if any, for each Share (or other kind of shares or securities) subject to then outstanding Awards shall be reduced proportionately, without changing the aggregate purchase price or value as to which outstanding Awards remain exercisable or subject to restrictions.
(ii) If at any time, or from time to time, the Company shall consolidate as a whole (by reclassification, reverse stock split, or otherwise) the number of Shares then outstanding into a lesser number of Shares, then (i) the maximum number of Shares available for the Plan as provided in Section 3 and the numerical Share limit set forth in Section 9 shall be decreased proportionately, and the kind of shares or other securities available for the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted, (ii) the number of Shares (or other kind of shares or securities) that may be acquired under any Award shall be decreased proportionately, and (iii) the price, if any, for each Share (or other kind of shares or securities) subject to then outstanding Awards shall be increased proportionately, without changing the aggregate purchase price, if any, or value as to which outstanding Awards remain exercisable or subject to restrictions.
(iii) Whenever the number of Shares subject to outstanding Awards and the price, if any, for each Share subject to outstanding Awards are required to be adjusted as provided in this Section 11(a), the Administrator shall promptly prepare a notice setting forth, in reasonable detail, the event requiring adjustment, the amount of the adjustment, the method by which such adjustment was calculated, and the change in price and the number of Shares, other securities, cash, or property purchasable subject to each Award after giving effect to the adjustments. The Administrator shall promptly give each Participant such a notice.
(iv) Adjustments under Sections 11(a)(i) and 11(a)(ii) shall be made by the Administrator, and its determination as to what adjustments shall be made and the extent thereof shall be final, binding, and conclusive. No fractional interest shall be issued under the Plan on account of any such adjustments.
(v) Except as set forth in Sections 11(a)(i) and 11(a)(ii), in the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of Shares, other securities, or other property), recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Shares or other securities of the Company, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the Shares occurs, the
A-6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Administrator, in order to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, may (in its sole discretion) adjust the number and class of Shares that may be delivered under the Plan and/or the number, class, and price of Shares covered by each outstanding Award, and the numerical Share limit set forth in Section 9.
(b) Dissolution or Liquidation. In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Administrator will notify each Participant as soon as practicable prior to the effective date of such proposed transaction.
(c) Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, each outstanding Award will be treated as the Administrator determines, including, without limitation, that each Award be assumed or an equivalent right substituted by the successor corporation or a Parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation. The Administrator will not be required to treat all Awards similarly in the transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the successor corporation does not assume or substitute for the Award, the restriction period of any Award of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall immediately be accelerated and the restrictions shall expire, and, with respect to Awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels and all other terms and conditions met.
Following such assumption or substitution in connection with a Change in Control, if a Participant’s status as Service Provider is terminated without Cause within twenty four (24) months following the Change in Control, then the restriction period of any Award of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall immediately be accelerated and the restrictions shall expire, and, with respect to Awards with performance-based vesting, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be deemed achieved at one hundred percent (100%) of target levels and all other terms and conditions met.
If a Change in Control involves a Restructuring or occurs in connection with a series of related transactions involving a Restructuring and if such Restructuring is in the form of a Non-Surviving Event and as a part of such Restructuring, stock, other securities, cash, or property shall be issuable or deliverable in exchange for Shares, then the Participant shall be entitled to purchase or receive (in lieu of the Shares that the Participant would otherwise be entitled to purchase or receive), as appropriate for the form of Award, the number of shares, other securities, cash, or property to which that number of Shares would have been entitled in connection with such Restructuring.
Notwithstanding anything in this Section 11(c) to the contrary, if a payment under an Award Agreement is subject to Section 409A of the Code and if the change in control definition contained in the Award Agreement or other agreement related to the Award does not comply with the definition of “change in control” for purposes of a distribution under Code Section 409A, then any payment of an amount that is otherwise accelerated under this Section will be delayed until the earliest time that such payment would be permissible under Code Section 409A without triggering any penalties applicable under Code Section 409A.
(d) Restructuring Without a Change in Control. In the event a Restructuring shall occur at any time while there is any outstanding Award hereunder and that Restructuring does not occur in connection with a Change in Control or a series of related transactions involving a Change in Control, then:
(i) the restriction period of any Award of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall not immediately be accelerated, and the restrictions shall not expire, merely because of the occurrence of the Restructuring; and
(ii) at the option of the Administrator, the Administrator may (but shall not be required to) cause the Company to take any one or more of the following actions:
(1) accelerate in whole or in part the expiration of some or all of the restrictions on any Restricted Stock Award;
(2) if the Restructuring is in the form of a Non-Surviving Event, cause the surviving entity to assume in whole or in part any one or more of the outstanding Awards upon such terms and provisions as the Administrator deems desirable; or
(3) redeem in whole or in part any one or more of the outstanding Awards (whether or not then exercisable) in consideration of a cash payment, as such payment may be reduced for tax withholding obligations in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value, determined as of the date immediately preceding the consummation of the Restructuring, of the aggregate number of Shares subject to the Award and as to which the Award is being redeemed.
A-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Company shall promptly notify each Participant of any election or action taken by the Company under this Section 11(d). In the event of any election or action taken by the Company pursuant to this Section 11(d) that requires the amendment or cancellation of any Award Agreement as may be specified in any notice to the Participant thereof, that Participant shall promptly deliver that Award Agreement to the Company in order for that amendment or cancellation to be implemented by the Company and the Administrator. The failure of the Participant to deliver any such Award Agreement to the Company as provided in the preceding sentence shall not in any manner affect the validity or enforceability of any action taken by the Company and the Administrator under this Section 11(d), including without limitation any redemption of an Award as of the consummation of a Restructuring. Any cash payment to be made by the Company pursuant to this Section 11(d) in connection with the redemption of any outstanding Awards shall be paid to the Participant thereof currently with the delivery to the Company of the Award Agreement evidencing that Award; provided, however, that any such redemption shall be effective upon the consummation of the Restructuring notwithstanding that the payment of the redemption price may occur subsequent to the consummation. If all or any portion of an outstanding Award is to be accelerated upon or after the consummation of a Restructuring that does not occur in connection with a Change in Control and is in the form of a Non-Surviving Event, and as a part of that Restructuring shares of stock, other securities, cash, or property shall be issuable or deliverable in exchange for Shares, then the Participant shall thereafter be entitled to purchase or receive (in lieu of the number of Shares that the Participant would otherwise be entitled to purchase or receive) the number of shares of stock, other securities, cash, or property to which such number of Shares would have been entitled in connection with the Restructuring and such Award shall be subject to adjustments that shall be as nearly equivalent as may be practical to the adjustments provided for in this Section 11.
(e) Notice of Restructuring. The Company shall attempt to keep all Participants informed with respect to any Restructuring or of any potential Restructuring to the same extent that the Company’s stockholders are informed by the Company of any such event or potential event.
12. Tax
(a) Withholding Requirements. Prior to the delivery of any Shares or cash pursuant to an Award (or exercise thereof), the Company will have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local, foreign or other taxes (including the Participant’s FICA obligation) required to be withheld with respect to such Award (or exercise thereof).
(b) Withholding Arrangements. The Administrator, in its sole discretion and pursuant to such procedures as it may specify from time to time, may permit a Participant to satisfy such tax withholding obligation, in whole or in part by (without limitation) (a) paying cash, (b) electing to have the Company withhold otherwise deliverable cash or Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld, (c) delivering to the Company already-owned Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount required to be withheld, provided the delivery of such Shares will not result in any adverse accounting consequences as the Administrator determines in its sole discretion, or (d) selling a sufficient number of Shares otherwise deliverable to the Participant through such means as the Administrator may determine in its sole discretion (whether through a broker or otherwise) equal to the amount required to be withheld. The amount of the withholding requirement will be deemed to include any amount which the Administrator agrees may be withheld at the time the election is made, not to exceed the amount determined by using the maximum federal, state or local marginal income tax rates applicable to the Participant with respect to the Award on the date that the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined. The Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld or delivered will be determined as of the date that the taxes are required to be withheld.
(c) Compliance With Section 409A. Awards will be designed and operated in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Section 409A such that the grant, payment, settlement or deferral will not be subject to the additional tax or interest applicable under Section 409A, except as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Administrator. The Plan and each Award Agreement under the Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 409A and will be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent, except as otherwise determined in the sole discretion of the Administrator. To the extent that an Award or payment, or the settlement or deferral thereof, is subject to Section 409A the Award will be granted, paid, settled or deferred in a manner that will meet the requirements of Section 409A, such that the grant, payment, settlement or deferral will not be subject to the additional tax or interest applicable under Section 409A.
A-8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

13. No Effect on Employment or Service. Neither the Plan nor any Award will confer upon a Participant any right with respect to continuing the Participant’s relationship as a Service Provider with the Company, nor will they interfere in any way with the Participant’s right or the Company’s right to terminate such relationship at any time, with or without cause, to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws.
14. Date of Grant. The date of grant of an Award will be, for all purposes, the date on which the Administrator makes the determination granting such Award, or such other later date as is determined by the Administrator. Notice of the determination will be provided to each Participant within a reasonable time after the date of such grant.
15. Term of Plan. Subject to Section 19 of the Plan, the Plan will become effective upon approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company at the 2020 annual stockholder meeting. It will continue in effect until the Company’s annual stockholder meeting in 2025, but in no event beyond December 31, 2025, unless terminated earlier under Section 16 of the Plan.
16. Amendment and Termination of the Plan.
(a) Amendment and Termination. The Administrator may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the Plan.
(b) Stockholder Approval. The Company will obtain stockholder approval of any Plan amendment to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with Applicable Laws.
(c) Effect of Amendment or Termination. No amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of the Plan will impair the rights of any Participant, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the Participant and the Administrator, which agreement must be in writing and signed by the Participant and the Company. Termination of the Plan will not affect the Administrator’s ability to exercise the powers granted to it hereunder with respect to Awards granted under the Plan prior to the date of such termination.
17. Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares.
(a) Legal Compliance. Shares will not be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Award unless the exercise of such Award and the issuance and delivery of such Shares will comply with Applicable Laws and will be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance.
(b) Investment Representations. As a condition to the exercise of an Award, the Company may require the person exercising such Award to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required.
18. Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, will relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority will not have been obtained.
19. Stockholder Approval. The Plan will be subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company after the date the Plan is adopted by the Board. Such stockholder approval will be obtained in the manner and to the degree required under Applicable Laws.
20. Forfeiture Events. The Administrator may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award will be subject to the reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary under this Plan, an Award will be subject to the Company’s clawback policy as may be established and/or amended from time to time (the “Clawback Policy”). The Administrator may require a Participant to forfeit, return or reimburse the Company all or a portion of the Award and any amounts paid thereunder pursuant to the terms of the Clawback Policy or as necessary or appropriate to comply with Applicable Laws.
A-9